Quest QoreStor vs. ZoomInfo Operations

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Quest QoreStor
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
QoreStor facilitates the adoption of most storage types, uniquely including cloud object storage like native object storage. QoreStor’s advanced compression and deduplication algorithms aim to slash storage requirements and costs anywhere QoreStor is deployed, even in the cloud. QoreStor includes ransomware protection capabilities to protect backup data. QoreStor replaces the Quest DR Series the former Dell / Quest backup and recovery solution, featuring data deduplication.N/A
ZoomInfo Operations
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
ZoomInfo OperationsOS/RingLead is a comprehensive data quality management platform for sales and marketing operations teams to clean, enrich, and route their go-to-market data.N/A
Pricing
Quest QoreStorZoomInfo Operations
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Quest QoreStorZoomInfo Operations
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeRequired
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Quest QoreStorZoomInfo Operations
Features
Quest QoreStorZoomInfo Operations
Data Quality
Comparison of Data Quality features of Product A and Product B
Quest QoreStor
-
Ratings
ZoomInfo Operations
8.2
Ratings
6% below category average
Data source connectivity00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Data profiling00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Data element standardization00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Match and merge00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Address verification00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Quest QoreStorZoomInfo Operations
Small Businesses
Carbonite Endpoint
Carbonite Endpoint
Score 8.8 out of 10
HubSpot Data Hub
HubSpot Data Hub
Score 7.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.7 out of 10
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.7 out of 10
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Quest QoreStorZoomInfo Operations
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Quest QoreStorZoomInfo Operations
Likelihood to Recommend
The product can be run on-premises or in the cloud. It is a fantastic option to reduce the size and storage requirements of backup jobs. If your backup system can already produce a reliable reduction in storage up to 75% then I would say the QoreStor appliance would be irrelevant in your case. It does not perform backups itself. It is simply an extra step to reduce size, encrypt and offload backups to the cloud. this reduces the load on a backup system to handle other tasks while the QoreStor takes over.
Read full review
The contact enrichment feature adds missing contact info, like emails or phone numbers. It also allows us to confirm that the address information on our CRM matches what Zoom says. I wish more emails were available within the service, but what you can glean from Zoom makes marketing to the correct personas much easier.
Read full review
Pros
  • Deduplication
  • Compression
  • Cloud Connection
  • Replication
Read full review
  • EverString allows us to build account lists based off in-depth firmographic or technographic data. It's far more accurate than trying to build these lists any other way.
  • EverString is fast. Where it might've previously taken us weeks to build lists of this quality, we now can build them in a matter of minutes (and have them ready to be published in a couple of hours).
Read full review
Cons
  • Disaster recovery from a populated cloud bucket needs improvement
  • It would be nice to have some limited integration into the KACE SMA product
  • The appliance is low resource use and virtual, but better access to system settings would be nice.
Read full review
  • Contacts underneath Companies can be outdated by 4+ years (left employer years prior).
  • Customer support is not as engaged as a smaller software company might be. Delays in solving issues.
  • Limits in sharing lists, queries, and tags between users under the same account.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
Would love to keep everstring as part of our tech stack in the future. if we ever have to move from everstring it will be due to budget not the solution itself.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Usability is among the highest I have ever worked within an application of this magnitude. It was a significant recession for us and our sales team along with some of our onboarding folks have been able to use the tool as well. Other are able to benefit as well that are outside of the sales team but I do get as much of their feedback as I do from the sales team.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
No problems
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
Had very good experience when using it
Read full review
Support Rating
The support team is the main reason I am sticking to Quest/KACE products. They are stellar to work with and always responsive when I need help. The team listens to the user's recommendations for added features and tends to add the ones that really have merit. Support is everything when it comes to working with such a company
Read full review
Quick response and quick resolution.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
It was helpful
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Have a plan on how you're going to evaluate. We had a two-month trial period, but a six-month average lead cycle time, making it impossible to evaluate on a purely new-business ROI basis within the trial. We applied the model to our prior data, which demonstrated how much time and effort was devoted to accounts that weren't going to close
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
When I evaluated the Dell system it was an entirely new server on-site, with licensed levels of inlocking the storage it had on board. For a smaller organization, the Dell system was not cost-effective with a large upfront payment, and additional hardware to manage on-site. The QoreStor system was a virtual machine that could pop into my current system and just use allocated storage already in place. In addition, the upfront cost was dramatically less than the Dell option and no additional hardware
Read full review
I haven't tried stacking it against any competition as I feel no need to. ZoomInfo blows me away like it first did in 2018, and I don't want something different. I hear Clay is good, but I just haven't felt the need to try it out or replace ZoomInfo at all.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
Hasn’t experienced any issues to doubt reliability
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Dramatically decreased cloud storage costs
  • Backup Jobs take less time on the Backup system
  • An additional level of backup and encryption
Read full review
  • The rate we close prospects run through Zoom products is up 10% on average
  • The time to close a prospect has been reduced by one calendar week (about 5%)
  • The time spent reviewing prospects has shrunk from 1-2 hours a week to 5-10 minutes which is HUGE.
Read full review
ScreenShots