Risk Proof vs. SEON. Fraud Fighters

Risk proof is well suited for quickly finding out potential money laundering [clients] and how much risk would it pose to get into a deal with the client. Risk proof is less suited around some ethical practice assessment of an organization. Such a scenario needs more manual intervention rather than tool assessment.

Incentivized

It is well suited for smaller businesses that would be a lot more in danger if a bigger amount of fraudulent transactions would come in. SEON is removing threats, bad merchants, and fraudsters from the equation.

• Data based visualization
• Open source for data gathering
• Thorough risk assessment

Incentivized

• Identifies chargeback issues
• Display all relevant info on front page
• Automatic block on accounts that may give a high red flag

Incentivized

• More market reach
• More tools for decision making by boardroom
• Lesser price for more client base

Incentivized

• I wish that SEON. Fraud Fighters had a live tracking map of orders.
• Maybe IP check could be more precise with mobile IPs.

Incentivized

very disappointed that they more than doubled their pricing within just 5 weeks, especially after being a loyal customer for 4 years. In my opinion, the new pricing is unreasonable for startups, and they refused to adjust it by even a dollar.

Their support is great, but it would be a lot better if they would have agents always ready to help.

It was the tool used in the organization for risk assessment of any potential leads and deals. Before the tool, we used to analyze any risks using manual effort and approach which used to take a lot more man-hours and less reliable quantitative analysis for similar kinds of deals and scenarios.

Incentivized

SEON: Offers real-time fraud detection with advanced digital footprinting, device fingerprinting, and behavioral analytics. Analyzes data from multiple sources (email, phone, IP address, social media) to build detailed user profiles. Customizable risk scoring and rule-setting allow businesses to tailor fraud prevention to their specific needs. ACOMS Risk Assessment: Typically focuses on risk assessment in financial transactions, often with more rigid and pre-configured parameters. May not provide the same level of granular control or real-time insights for businesses outside traditional finance. Advantage: SEON’s broader and more flexible features make it a better fit for industries beyond traditional finance, such as e-commerce, gaming, and subscription services.

Incentivized

• Helped determining risks for ongoing deals
• Helped in Decision making process in board meetings
• Negative: Added some cost to the project

Incentivized

• It helps positively by finding early chargebacks
• It helps positively by help stopping fraud with high fraud scores implemented
• It helps positively by stopping excessive purchases that can lead to high exposure and possible chargeback

Incentivized