Progress Sitefinity is a content management and customer analytics platform. It supports content management, tailored marketing, multi-channel management, and ecommerce sites.
N/A
Umbraco CMS
Score 6.7 out of 10
N/A
Umbraco is an open-source .NET Core CMS with over 700,000 active installs worldwide and with more than 200,000 active community members. It was first released on February 16th, 2005, and is still to this day an open-source project backed by a commercial company. To ensure Umbraco is always running the latest technology, the company has aligned with Microsoft's .NET release schedule to always have the Umbraco CMS…
$0
Pricing
Progress Sitefinity
Umbraco CMS
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Umbraco Free
$0
Umbraco Starter
$53
per month
Umbraco Standard
$320
per month
Umbraco Professional
$860
per month
Umbraco Cloud Enterprise
Custom Pricing
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Progress Sitefinity
Umbraco CMS
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
The Umbraco CMS and all of its core features are the same across all plans.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Progress Sitefinity
Umbraco CMS
Features
Progress Sitefinity
Umbraco CMS
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Progress Sitefinity
8.1
Ratings
1% below category average
Umbraco CMS
9.0
Ratings
11% above category average
Role-based user permissions
8.10 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Progress Sitefinity
8.1
Ratings
3% below category average
Umbraco CMS
8.5
Ratings
11% above category average
API
8.10 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language
8.10 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
Progress Sitefinity
8.0
Ratings
5% above category average
Umbraco CMS
8.0
Ratings
4% above category average
WYSIWYG editor
8.10 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness
8.00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Admin section
8.00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Page templates
8.10 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Library of website themes
8.00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design
8.00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Publishing workflow
8.10 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Form generator
8.00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Progress Sitefinity
8.0
Ratings
10% above category average
Umbraco CMS
7.2
Ratings
2% below category average
Content taxonomy
8.10 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
SEO support
8.10 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Bulk management
8.00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Availability / breadth of extensions
8.00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Community / comment management
8.00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Progress Sitefinity
Umbraco CMS
Small Businesses
Bloomreach - The Agentic Platform for Personalization
It's one of the easiest to use, easiest to customize CMS system available on the Microsoft technology stack. Whenever there's an application need for user management, role-based permissions, workflows and page-content, it is simply not done to start custom development from scratch. For complex 'factory-approaches' its architectural implementation shines brightest and allows for hybrid deployments, full Azure DevOps integration and ensures security and governance are not sacrificed
Umbraco is well suited for websites that are looking to do a wide range of activities that require complex technoligies. An example of this is a company with several different products or services. Umbraco would be overkill for simple sites that are mostly static. It is also difficult to find developers who have Umbraco experience, as it's market share is not all that high
Once templates and custom data has been defined, it is very easy for CMS authors/editors to manage content on the site without knowledge of HTML programming.
Programming templates and custom module and extending the CMS is fairly straightforward for our development team.
Security is in the forefront, with regular updates and enhancements to the product.
Working with support is great, they have extensive knowledge on the product are able to assist if called upon.
Product utilizes .net standards, and also integrates well will standard front end tools such as jquery/bootstrap.
Diagram or illustrate more use cases for server setups, and managing of upgrades.
I'd like to see the ability to synchronize from one server to multiple others at once.
Implementation assistance as part of the purchase rather than farming out to 3rd party, although they did answer every question we asked in order to determine our best architecture setup.
Migration of data between servers. There are tools that you can pay for that help facilitate this, but like any CMS system, there are still some tricks to getting it to work correctly.
Running as a Web Project instead of a Web Site. Umbraco does not run compiled code, but instead compiles it on the fly. I find this to cause some performance issues that would otherwise be resolved with a compiled code base.
Very big fan of this CMS, as it allows scalability, performance, and everything else. The support is great whenever we need it. As a marketer, the digital/marketing side of things is very easy to use and we've seen strong results from an SEO and marketing perspective. I can't speak to the developer/creative side too much, but in talking with these teams, they do recommend the tool as well.
Umbraco CMS effectively addresses enterprise content management needs. It's quite mature .NET based CMS, standing out as a leader among its competitors. Websites built with Umbraco are blazing fast. Extensive customization capabilities, and user-friendly content publishing interface makes it an ideal choice for businesses looking for a mature CMS solution.
Working in the admin panel (adding / reviewing / editing content) is very slow. The public facing site speed is dependent on what the pages are doing and how well the code was written (whether it is optimized for speed).
Support can be pretty good, even though, depending on the level of licensing, it can take longer to hear back from their team. They do have a phone option, which works well. Overall, they are knowledgeable, and helpful when needed. At times, support is able to access the system directly and troubleshoot critical items when needed.
N/A - I was not part of the implementation team. We have had this internally for over 5 years. Based on my experience, ensure that you have documentation on the initial implementation and subsequent upgrades. I would also recommend to have all the documentation on how and why the system was implemented the way it was
Spend the time to wireframe the content structure prior to diving in. This helps speed the process of implementation and it serves as documentation for end users.
We evaluated a range of other platforms before selecting Progress Sitefinity. While many other platforms had a powerful range of features, Progress Sitefinity provided to be a comparable product at a price far more suited to our budget. Above all else, its ease of use gained the highest scores in our testing, and the interface has continued to develop and improve over the past three years.
We previously used WordPress, however this was not easy to use, it was a complicated system and was limited in what we could achieve, there was a big outlay in buying bolts on and ensuring the system was safe. We found we where spammed loads, we tried to make it work however after a year we decided to leave WordPress behind. The company did evaluated Adobe but the dev team decided that Umbraco was the best tool to meet our own needs.