TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Lucidworks Platform vs. MarkLogic Server

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Lucidworks Platform

    Score10 out of 10
    N/ALucidworks provides total AI solutions that power search and discovery for customers and employees. Lucidworks integrates the latest generative AI models with a decade of proven search expertise to create a truly personalized digital experience for users.N/A

    MarkLogic Server

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AMarkLogic Server is a multi-model database that has both NoSQL and trusted enterprise data management capabilities. The vendor states it is the most secure multi-model database, and it’s deployable in any environment. They state it is an ideal database to power a data hub.

    $0.01

    per MCU/per hour + 0.10 per GB/per month

    Pricing
    Lucidworks PlatformMarkLogic Server
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Low Priority Fixed
    $0.01
    per MCU/per hour + 0.10 per GB/per month
    Standard Reserved
    $0.07
    per MCU/per hour + 0.10 per GB/per month
    Standard On-Demand
    $0.13
    per MCU/per hour + 0.10 per GB/per month
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Lucidworks PlatformMarkLogic Server
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    Lucidworks PlatformMarkLogic Server
    NoSQL Databases
    Comparison of NoSQL Databases features of Lucidworks Platform and MarkLogic Server
    Feature
    Lucidworks Platform
    -
    Ratings
    MarkLogic Server
    7.9
    2 Ratings
    11% below category average
    Performance00 Ratings8.52 Ratings
    Availability00 Ratings8.02 Ratings
    Concurrency00 Ratings7.52 Ratings
    Security00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
    Scalability00 Ratings8.52 Ratings
    Data model flexibility00 Ratings7.02 Ratings
    Deployment model flexibility00 Ratings6.52 Ratings
    User Ratings
    Lucidworks PlatformMarkLogic Server
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    9.0
    (7 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (7 ratings)
    Usability
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Lucidworks PlatformMarkLogic Server
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Lucidworks
    Very well suited for out of the box enterprise search applications.
    Read full review
    Progress Software
    If you are storing META data then MarkLogic is super useful as it retrieves everything so fast, while storing the whole data shows performance issues some times. If you have legacy systems then migrating from it would really require sweat and blood, on the other hand if you are in systems like Node.js you can simply integrate two systems easily. If you don't know how in the end your your data schema will look like then it's better to make a prototype using MarkLogic.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Lucidworks
    • Signals feature to boost search results helps search relevancy
    • Business Rules feature for tuning search results
    • Query pipeline design gives great flexibility in application development
    Read full review
    Progress Software
    • Search was really advanced. Hard to set up and had limitations about semantical meanings between xml nodes, but provided very good search abilities.
    • The organization of documents across collections and metadata was particularly useful.
    • The REST abilities were very advanced and worked with XQuery well.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Lucidworks
    • Documentation can be improved
    Read full review
    Progress Software
    • MarkLogic still has a long way to go in fostering the developer community. Many developers are gravitating to the simple integrations and do not delve into the deeper capabilities. They have made tremendous strides in recent months and I am sure this will improve over time.
    • Many of the best features are left on the floor by enterprises who end up implementing MarkLogic as a data store. MarkLogic needs to help customers find ways to better leverage their investment and be more creative in how they use the product.
    • Licensing costs become a major hurdle for adoption. The pricing model has improved for basic implementations, but the costs seem very prohibitive for some verticals and for some of the most advanced features.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Lucidworks
    No answers on this topic
    Progress Software
    MarkLogic is expensive but solid. While we use open source for almost everything else, the backend database is too critically important. At this point, re-tooling for a different back end would take too much time to be a viable option.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Lucidworks
    It is incredibly intuitive and so easy to use that business people can now complete functions that used to be limited to software developers only.
    Read full review
    Progress Software
    Very little about it can be done better or with greater ease. Even things that seem difficult aren't really that bad. There's multiple ways to accomplish any admin task. MarkLogic requires a fraction of administrative effort that you see with enterprise RDBMS like Oracle. MarkLogic is continually improving the tools to simplify cluster configuration and maintenance.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Lucidworks
    It has continued to improve over the years.
    Read full review
    Progress Software
    There's always room for improvement. Some problems get solved faster than others, of course. MarkLogic's direct support is very responsive and professional. If they can't help immediately, they always have good feedback and are eager to receive information and details to work to replicate the problem. They are quick to escalate major support issues and production show-stopping problems. In addition to MarkLogic's direct support, there are several employees who are very active among the community and many questions and common issues get quick attention from helpful responses to email and StackOverflow questions.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Lucidworks
    IDOL seems to be a blackbox solution. Fusion is much more flexible with more features and options for developers to choose from.
    Read full review
    Progress Software
    We had Fast in place when Microsoft had bought it up and was going to change / deprecate it. One of the biggest advantages of MarkLogic for search actually had to do with the rest of the content pipeline - it allowed us to have it all in one technology. On the NoSQL side, we looked at MongoDB a couple years back. At that time, MarkLogic came in stronger on indexing, transaction reliability, and DR options. For us, that was worth using a commercial product.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Lucidworks
    • Allowed us to move software developers from enterprise search to other customer focused applications due to built in signals processing and related popularity boosting out of the box.
    • Enabled business experts to work directly with Fusion to influence search results and not be so dependent on developers.
    Read full review
    Progress Software
    • MarkLogic reduced the amount of time that the DevOps team needed to dedicate to database updates, as the engineering team was mostly able to easily design and maintain database upgrades without requiring specialists such as database architects on the DevOps side. This capability flowed from the product's speed and the versatility of its XQuery language and libraries.
    • MarkLogic required significant education and buy-in time for the engineering team.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots