Procurify vs. Zip Intake-to-Procure

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Procurify
Score 9.0 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Procurify is a cloud-based purchase order approval workflow software. It is used by organizations of all sizes to track purchase orders from creation to final delivery.N/A
Zip Intake-to-Procure
Score 7.9 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Zip provides a place for employees to initiate a purchase or vendor request. Each request is routed for approval across procurement, finance, IT, data security, legal, and other teams, and Zip integrates into ERP and P2P solutions to create a PR or draft PO. The vendor states Zip works with Canva, Checkr, Hopin, Zapier, CM Group, and other companies both public and private.N/A
Pricing
ProcurifyZip Intake-to-Procure
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ProcurifyZip Intake-to-Procure
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeRequiredNo setup fee
Additional DetailsProcurify is priced on a per-user, per-month model, billed annually. The software supports types of users to fit different roles and functions within an organization. There are also volume discounts.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ProcurifyZip Intake-to-Procure
Best Alternatives
ProcurifyZip Intake-to-Procure
Small Businesses
MIP Fund Accounting
MIP Fund Accounting
Score 8.7 out of 10
MIP Fund Accounting
MIP Fund Accounting
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Precoro
Precoro
Score 2.8 out of 10
Precoro
Precoro
Score 2.8 out of 10
Enterprises
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
Score 8.6 out of 10
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ProcurifyZip Intake-to-Procure
Likelihood to Recommend
9.9
(0 ratings)
7.7
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
ProcurifyZip Intake-to-Procure
Likelihood to Recommend
Procurify is well suited for Purchasing approvals, and Expense Reimbursement Approvals. The app made it effortless to request for expense reimbursements.
Read full review
Zip is a newer product in the P2P space, and as such there are still some areas for improvement. They don't have all the "bells and whistles" products and configurations that some of the other players in this space have, but the products they do offer are best in class. Zip is an ideal tool for tactical procurement.
Read full review
Pros
  • Workflow, ease of getting items to the person that is needed to approve.
  • Delegation, ease of setting up a temporary approver while a user is out on vacation.
  • Emailing PO's to vendors, don't have to save then email. Can email directly from Procurify.
Read full review
  • No coding - Ability for the administrator to make changes without development resources helps us be agile as a procurement org.
  • Visibility to the user in a great user interface
  • Accountability (helps us track SLAs on response time), Audit trails keeping track of everything
  • The implementation team was incredible, as is ongoing support. They want you to succeed in your goals vs. just implement their tool
Read full review
Cons
  • Ability to have concurrent budgets open for different years.
  • Inventory capability.
  • Switch items on a requisition to a catalog item before cutting the PO.
Read full review
  • Missing the ability to proxy as another user. Currently, if one approver did not set up their delegation, an admin or the approver of that step must reassign each of the approvals to another person.
  • Bulk upload options for admins to update queues and subqueues.
  • Missing ability to schedule reports or the option to share a saved view with another user. It would be easier if certain filtered views can be shared with others to avoid each user having to create their own views.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Incredibly responsive and helpful.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We did our evaluation more than five years ago so I don't remember the names. Procurify was the only one (at the time) that met all of our needs. Procurify service and support is fantastic. No doubt we made the right choice.
Read full review
Truth be told, we haven’t seen any other similar products. The alternative was manually tracking in Google Sheets, ticketing systems, and in NetSuite. Coupa was probably the closest in terms of what we were looking for but they were not willing to fit it to our needs like Zip was able to.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Financial tracking to spend less.
  • Ability to track and report budgets for multiple locations.
Read full review
  • Zip Intake-to-Procure has helped clean up forecasting for us - we've improved accuracy by over 30% since now we're forcing folks to make sure spend is captured accurately and checking submitted PO amounts against the bottoms up forecast
  • We've also been able to leverage the SLA insights provided by Zip Intake-to-Procure to increase operational efficiencies. We're identified orgs that are slowing down the overall approval process and putting more pressure with shorter SLA times.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Zip Intake-to-Procure Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Zip supports ultra-configurable, parallel workflows with our no-code configuration.Screenshot of Zip also integrates with all major ticketing, CLM, GRC, and ERP/P2P solutions. Here's an example integration card for JIRA.Screenshot of Zip has an optional vendor-facing portal for the vendor to provide diligence materials, including documents, surveys, and even bank settlement information.Screenshot of Zip's vendor-facing portal includes an optional bank settlement form with an attestation.