ProcurementExpress.com vs. Zip Intake-to-Procure
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ProcurementExpress.com | Score10 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | ProcurementExpress.com is designed for small to medium-sized companies to gain full control of purchasing. Team members raise requests against specific pre-defined budgets. Managers approve, decline, or comment on requests - straight from their inbox. Once approved, team members can purchase the requested item and attach all relevant documents for easy reporting and auditing. An iOS and Android app is included free of charge. 24/5 online chat support . A "full view" dashboard… | $30 per user, per month |
Zip Intake-to-Procure | Score7.9 out of 10 | Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees) | Zip provides a place for employees to initiate a purchase or vendor request. Each request is routed for approval across procurement, finance, IT, data security, legal, and other teams, and Zip integrates into ERP and P2P solutions to create a PR or draft PO. The vendor states Zip works with Canva, Checkr, Hopin, Zapier, CM Group, and other companies both public and private. | N/A |
| ProcurementExpress.com | Zip Intake-to-Procure | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| ProcurementExpress.com | Zip Intake-to-Procure | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 12 Answers | 100% Would buy again 22 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 12 Answers | 100% Delivers good value for the price 22 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 12 Answers | 100% Happy with the feature set 22 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 8 Answers | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 18 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 8 Answers | 100% Implementation went as expected 17 Answers | |
| ProcurementExpress.com | Zip Intake-to-Procure | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | Precoro Score2.8 out of 10 | Precoro Score2.8 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Coupa Score7.9 out of 10 | Coupa Score7.9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| ProcurementExpress.com | Zip Intake-to-Procure | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 5.5 | 7.7 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.1 | - |
| Support Rating | 8.8 | 9.1 |
| ProcurementExpress.com | Zip Intake-to-Procure | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | ProcurementExpress.com Screenshots | Zip Intake-to-Procure Screenshots |
















