ProcessMaker vs. UiPath Integration Service

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
ProcessMaker
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
ProcessMaker is a process automation platform that helps organizations optimize and scale their business operations. By combining workflow automation, AI-driven decision-making, and advanced analytics, ProcessMaker empowers businesses to streamline complex processes, improve efficiency, and enhance customer experiences.N/A
UiPath Integration Service
Score 5.0 out of 10
N/A
UiPath Integration Service (including technology from Cloud Elements, following UiPath's acquisition of the company in 2021) is a cloud API integration service that uses cooperative apps to connect an organization’s customers, partners and employees to the cloud services they use. The vendor says that by using their pre-built elements, their one-to-many approach connects applications with services, each through a single API. The organization’s app can instantly share data with other applications…N/A
Pricing
ProcessMakerUiPath Integration Service
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ProcessMakerUiPath Integration Service
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ProcessMakerUiPath Integration Service
Features
ProcessMakerUiPath Integration Service
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
ProcessMaker
9.3
6 Ratings
14% above category average
UiPath Integration Service
-
Ratings
Dashboards10.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports9.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports9.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
ProcessMaker
9.2
6 Ratings
25% above category average
UiPath Integration Service
-
Ratings
Process designer10.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Process simulation10.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Business rules engine8.06 Ratings00 Ratings
SOA support9.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Process player9.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Form builder9.75 Ratings00 Ratings
Model execution9.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ProcessMakerUiPath Integration Service
Small Businesses
CMW Platform
CMW Platform
Score 9.0 out of 10
Make
Make
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.9 out of 10
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Redwood RunMyJobs
Redwood RunMyJobs
Score 9.6 out of 10
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ProcessMakerUiPath Integration Service
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(6 ratings)
8.6
(8 ratings)
User Testimonials
ProcessMakerUiPath Integration Service
Likelihood to Recommend
ProcessMaker Inc.
The task mining component is well suited for processes where there are a lot of steps performed in a variety of systems, particularly by a single individual on a team. It also requires a robust activity ID to be able to track an activity. It is not well suited when trying to track a process where the content is in an email.
Read full review
UiPath
Cloud Elements shines when you want to offer multiple options to the user on a type of system, such as supporting integration to CRM and wanting to offer Dynamics, Salesforce, and HubSpot on equal footing. If you only have a single integration with a single system, using Cloud Elements adds an unnecessary layer of abstraction.
Read full review
Pros
ProcessMaker Inc.
  • User interface. It is clean and easy to understand. You won't get overwhelmed the second you log in.
  • The workflow maker. With a drag and drop interface, you can easily visualize and implement what you want on the screen. Out of all the programs we tested, this one had the easiest process maker and designer.
  • Ease of understanding. My biggest recommendation would be that this program is easy to access for anyone. There are complications (see negatives) but this program can be implemented quickly and efficiently, and nearly anyone can learn to use it. You will not feel like you are in the dark with it.
Read full review
UiPath
  • The API itself is very robust and easy to use, being a standard REST interface, standard HTTP response codes, well-packaged error messages, etc.
  • Their uptime is great! I think I've seen one (short) 5-minute' blip' the entire time we've been connected for any type of primary function.
  • Their support is top notch, they respond quickly, and the team that works with you is communicative and knowledgable.
Read full review
Cons
ProcessMaker Inc.
  • Complications when you get to the more advanced pieces. When trialing, I found that the more advanced a process got, the more complicated it got for me in coding. When you begin using the more advanced features, you will find that you need to have a basic knowledge of coding - otherwise you won't go any further. This was my sole issue. Unfortunately, it was one that would have brought the school to a grinding halt if they were to ever get more complicated than they were.
Read full review
UiPath
  • The only thing I can think of that they could improve is the quality of the assets they produce in the go-to-market process. This is a huge value add service, but the quality of what was produced was lower than what we would have produced internally. We spent more time going back and forth on the assets than it would have taken us to build them from scratch.
Read full review
Usability
ProcessMaker Inc.
I gave this overall rating for ProcessMaker due to its overall flexibility, design and ease of use for most. Examples of this from us include it being an excellent and trustworthy tool for automating processes, the abilities and capabilities for real-time process tracking and the web-based accessibility and implementation which allows for easy access and management of the tool.
Read full review
UiPath
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
ProcessMaker Inc.
Before making the decision to get ProcessMaker, we assessed different and best options in the market, which are also quite competitive. KiSSFLOW, Blueworks Live, and Bizagi, being the most relevant and ADONIS, to mention the ones we consider the most relevant and capable of meeting our needs. In the end, we went for ProcessMaker because of mainly three things as described before: 1. Real-time process status tracking. 2. Metrics and dashboards. 3. Ease of use for constructing diagrams.
Read full review
UiPath
At the time we found Cloud Elements we found no other option that had a Unified API for cloud storage providers.
Read full review
Scalability
ProcessMaker Inc.
The capability is robust and quite industry agnostic. It would benefit significantly with some out of the box models - e.g. procure to pay on SAP and similar. They could also develop industry specific examples which could kickstart the implementation for organizations.
Read full review
UiPath
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
ProcessMaker Inc.
  • I'm using Communication edition to introduce BPMN in my organization. I can build the first process in a short time, make my boss more confident with my job.
  • But, with ProcessMaker, we need more time to design code to handle the process, and without PHP/Javascript Programmer, it seems hard to work with more and more processes online.
  • However, IE Browser is not well supported, somewhat let the user confuse.
Read full review
UiPath
  • Not my area of expertise, but it made my job as an implementer much easier, especially after finishing the first integration.
Read full review
ScreenShots