ProcessMaker is a process automation platform that helps organizations optimize and scale their business operations. By combining workflow automation, AI-driven decision-making, and advanced analytics, ProcessMaker empowers businesses to streamline complex processes, improve efficiency, and enhance customer experiences.
N/A
Tallyfy
Score 8.0 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Tallyfy is designed to eliminate flowcharts and aims to focus on enabling anyone to do and track any process in the easiest possible way. This solution enables users to track the status of many processes going on at the same time - within a real-time dashboard. Examples of repeatable processes include client onboarding, customer success, guided sales and compliance checks. The vendor’s value proposition is that their solution collects valuable data about the effectiveness and…
$15
per user, per month
Pricing
ProcessMaker
Tallyfy
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Basic
$15.00
per user, per month
Professional
$30.00
per user, per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ProcessMaker
Tallyfy
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
$500 Per organization
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ProcessMaker
Tallyfy
Features
ProcessMaker
Tallyfy
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
ProcessMaker
9.3
Ratings
14% above category average
Tallyfy
10.0
Ratings
20% above category average
Dashboards
10.00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Standard reports
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
ProcessMaker
9.2
Ratings
25% above category average
Tallyfy
10.0
Ratings
18% above category average
Process designer
10.00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Process simulation
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Business rules engine
8.00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
SOA support
9.00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Process player
9.00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Form builder
9.70 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Model execution
9.00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Collaboration
Comparison of Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
I loved it. You will not get an easier interface. You can develop workflow processes in a simple way, one which allows anyone to understand what you are trying to accomplish; however, you will get into some issues if your employees are scared of coding (when you get to the advanced features). For some, this will never be an issue as the knowledge you need is very basic. But for the school I was working with, it would have stopped them cold
Good for customizing an onboarding process to help ensure a smooth process, and setting up a contract for electronic signature in an easier way than customizing an editable PDF and uploading it to any number of eSign platforms. I've integrated Tallyfy, using Zapier, to Webmerge and Signnow, to get the result I was looking for, but there are plenty of ways Tallyfy can be implemented.
Easily to collect data to serve any number of purposes.
We use it to collect data about our clients and to collect the data necessary to customize the contract and the customer experience.
Tallyfy Webhooks then allow us to push that data out to other platforms, etc, so I've been able to create a solution that completes the document and sends it out for electronic signature with the click of a button... once the data has been collected.
Create drop-downs, radio selections, checkboxes, short and long text paragraphs, etc. Even uploading documents and saving them directly to your favorite cloud storage, such as Drive or Dropbox.
Manage the process from one team member to the next, depending on responsibility.
Complications when you get to the more advanced pieces. When trialing, I found that the more advanced a process got, the more complicated it got for me in coding. When you begin using the more advanced features, you will find that you need to have a basic knowledge of coding - otherwise you won't go any further. This was my sole issue. Unfortunately, it was one that would have brought the school to a grinding halt if they were to ever get more complicated than they were.
I'd like more control over the view. For example, some way to condense the view so that more data can be seen at once. Currently, in my opinion, it is just a little too large or blown up, but this may be a petty request.
I gave this overall rating for ProcessMaker due to its overall flexibility, design and ease of use for most. Examples of this from us include it being an excellent and trustworthy tool for automating processes, the abilities and capabilities for real-time process tracking and the web-based accessibility and implementation which allows for easy access and management of the tool.
Based on our experience, the agent for ProcessMaker Task Mining is more robust than for either of the competing products. However Celonis is has a significantly more mature user interface, and UiPath has a significantly more configurable interface.
I gave this rating for the adaptability and growth for Processmaker for its many capabilities for support and flexibility. These include ease of integration with many other systems, its open source version for its extended customization and capabilities of the tool and its low-code / no-code capabilities to be able to easily design and automate processes with minimal or no-code.
I'm using Communication edition to introduce BPMN in my organization. I can build the first process in a short time, make my boss more confident with my job.
But, with ProcessMaker, we need more time to design code to handle the process, and without PHP/Javascript Programmer, it seems hard to work with more and more processes online.
However, IE Browser is not well supported, somewhat let the user confuse.