Process Street in San Francisco offers their application which allows teams to create simple recurring checklists, collaborate around them and track as they’re completed.
$0
per month per user
ProcessMaker
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
ProcessMaker is a process automation platform that helps organizations optimize and scale their business operations. By combining workflow automation, AI-driven decision-making, and advanced analytics, ProcessMaker empowers businesses to streamline complex processes, improve efficiency, and enhance customer experiences.
N/A
Pricing
Process Street
ProcessMaker
Editions & Modules
Free
$0
per month per user
Pro
$25
per month per user
Enterprise
Custom
per month per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Process Street
ProcessMaker
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Process Street
ProcessMaker
Features
Process Street
ProcessMaker
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Process Street
10.0
Ratings
20% above category average
ProcessMaker
9.3
Ratings
14% above category average
Dashboards
10.00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Standard reports
10.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Custom reports
10.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
Process Street
9.7
Ratings
15% above category average
ProcessMaker
9.2
Ratings
25% above category average
Process designer
9.20 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Form builder
10.00 Ratings
9.70 Ratings
Model execution
10.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Process simulation
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Business rules engine
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
SOA support
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Process player
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Collaboration
Comparison of Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Process Street
9.0
Ratings
7% above category average
ProcessMaker
-
Ratings
Social collaboration tools
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content Management Capabilties
Comparison of Content Management Capabilties features of Product A and Product B
if you have standard processes that are often executed, it's worth to use. If you are a small company it is generally not worth to implement because you will need somebody who permanently works with it and maintains the processes.
I loved it. You will not get an easier interface. You can develop workflow processes in a simple way, one which allows anyone to understand what you are trying to accomplish; however, you will get into some issues if your employees are scared of coding (when you get to the advanced features). For some, this will never be an issue as the knowledge you need is very basic. But for the school I was working with, it would have stopped them cold
If you had the ability to drag tasks around in a nonlinear way, it could be a cool creative feature. An example is to have a subtask next to another that says N/A if the task wasn't executed because it wasn't applicable.
Inbox tab can be overwhelming but that may just be the style in which I built my checklists.
Complications when you get to the more advanced pieces. When trialing, I found that the more advanced a process got, the more complicated it got for me in coding. When you begin using the more advanced features, you will find that you need to have a basic knowledge of coding - otherwise you won't go any further. This was my sole issue. Unfortunately, it was one that would have brought the school to a grinding halt if they were to ever get more complicated than they were.
I gave this overall rating for ProcessMaker due to its overall flexibility, design and ease of use for most. Examples of this from us include it being an excellent and trustworthy tool for automating processes, the abilities and capabilities for real-time process tracking and the web-based accessibility and implementation which allows for easy access and management of the tool.
Since my last login into the platform, the latest update made the app much easier to use and learn. It's incredibly clean, and everything is exactly where it should be location-wise. You can tell they listen to their user base for features.
I've tried other checklist tools like Google Keep, but it was too simple. I've tried Flowster, which is very similar to Process Street, but I like Process Street better. The interface is a lot more balanced and pleasant to look at. I found Flowster to be a less appealing interface even though the features were similar. I also briefly tried systemHUB but it is very expensive for what it offers compared to Process Street.
Based on our experience, the agent for ProcessMaker Task Mining is more robust than for either of the competing products. However Celonis is has a significantly more mature user interface, and UiPath has a significantly more configurable interface.
I gave this rating for the adaptability and growth for Processmaker for its many capabilities for support and flexibility. These include ease of integration with many other systems, its open source version for its extended customization and capabilities of the tool and its low-code / no-code capabilities to be able to easily design and automate processes with minimal or no-code.
Because of Process Street I am no longer losing money when having to redo things
It helps me eliminate those nasty "egg on the face" situations with clients because now nothing slips through the cracks. The team is able to be on top of it!
I'm using Communication edition to introduce BPMN in my organization. I can build the first process in a short time, make my boss more confident with my job.
But, with ProcessMaker, we need more time to design code to handle the process, and without PHP/Javascript Programmer, it seems hard to work with more and more processes online.
However, IE Browser is not well supported, somewhat let the user confuse.
