TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    PractiTest

    Score8 out of 10
    N/APractiTest is presented as a cloud-based test management tool that provides its customers with an end-to-end system to meet testing and QA needs. It is described by the vendor as flexible but methodological, enabling organizations to ensure visibility and communication at all levels. The solution aims to help users and project development teams streamline and manage their testing processes, while providing management with a clear and simple view of their project status at all times.

    $39

    user

    Tuskr

    Score10 out of 10
    N/ATuskr is a cloud-based test management software. Users can manage test cases, conduct test runs and integrate with bug and time tracking tools. Tuskr is available via a free plan, and with a 30-day free trial of paid tier features.

    $45

    per month 5 users (minimum)

    Pricing
    PractiTestTuskr
    Editions & Modules
    Professional
    $39.00
    user
    Enterprise
    $49.00
    user
    Team
    $9
    per month per user
    Business
    $15
    per month per user
    Enterprise
    $29
    per month per user
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    PractiTestTuskr
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional Details—16% discount for annual pricing.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    PractiTestTuskr
    Considered Both Products
    PractiTest
    No answer on this topic
    Celoxis
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Would buy again
    25 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    23 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    25 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    21 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    21 Answers
    Features
    PractiTestTuskr
    Test Management
    Comparison of Test Management features of PractiTest and Tuskr
    Feature
    PractiTest
    8.5
    4 Ratings
    5% above category average
    Tuskr
    9.9
    23 Ratings
    21% above category average
    Centralized test management9.24 Ratings9.922 Ratings
    Map tests to user stories8.44 Ratings00 Ratings
    Test execution reporting8.44 Ratings9.923 Ratings
    Defect management8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    User Ratings
    PractiTestTuskr
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.7
    (4 ratings)
    10.0
    (24 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.9
    (3 ratings)
    Support Rating
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    PractiTestTuskr
    Likelihood to Recommend
    PractiTest
    PractiTest works GREAT as a test case repository. It is very easy to gather metrics, filter, and sort based on custom fields. We were able to work with the API to pull our automation results in as well. The support team is always very quick with their responses and monitors the "in-app chat." They are very open to answering questions, providing best practice materials, and looking for additional feedback. If you already have a central location for all of your test cases and testing needs, then I guess you probably wouldn't need to add another. However, PractiTest has high capability and potential, so if it's set up properly you can easily save time managing your tests.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Celoxis
    Its interface, features and dashboard which help a lot to streamline the workflow. And its really very ease to use. My team and I just use this software and adapt in a week. I surely recommend to any organisation, in regards of pricing, features and interface. And their customer support.
    Read full review
    Pros
    PractiTest
    • Effective Test case template.
    • Can integrate with different Atlassian products.
    • Report generation.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Celoxis
    • Its easy to import test cases in Tuskr by using the csv import feature
    • Test runs are easy to create and can include test cases from multiple suits.
    • Reports of test runs make it easier to track all the cases that were covered at a particular instance before giving a release signoff.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    PractiTest
    • Linking the defect with Jira throws an error quite some times which can be improved in the future.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Celoxis
    • When you click into a specific test, the status automatically clears. it would be nice for this to be preserved when clicking in instead of clearing
    • It would be nice to be able to add comments specific to certain steps in each test, instead of just one big comment box
    • Since we use Tuskr for QA, we structure it as a table with instructions and expected results. because these are side by side, sometimes it is hard to go in a step-by-step order when there are multiple QA steps to take to complete the test.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    PractiTest
    No answers on this topic
    Celoxis
    Tuskr suits our organization needs
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    PractiTest
    No answers on this topic
    Celoxis
    The test case management and automating repetitive tasks, Tuskr saves significant time for my QA teams. The whole process was very easy for my team to adapt and get comfortable with other software. We were continuously able to improve our business and this had a significant positive impact on customer satisfaction and retention.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    PractiTest
    The chat button is available to anyone who logs into PractiTest. In my experience, the support has always been very quick, very friendly, and very thorough. They make sure that your question is answered in a way that you understand it. They also provide documentation of best practices so you are never left hanging on what to do next.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Celoxis
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    PractiTest
    I've used many different Test Case Repository tools, and while each of them has its perks, I like the capabilities of PractiTest best. When creating a test in qTest for example, you can only input information into the fields provided, and you have everything set up in a folder tree structure. With PractiTest, we are able to create custom fields and filter our tests based on those fields to provide more accurate information in a readily available format while quickly searching for the filter instead of through a folder tree. TestRail did not appear to meet our needs as a company. It just didn't have the potential that we found with PractiTest. Zephyr for example worked seamlessly with Jira, which is really nice since that is what we use for the most part. However since we cater to many different clients, we needed an external Test Case repository so we could use something that wasn't tied to 1 Jira instance.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Celoxis
    I have not worked with related testing suite before but Tuskr has been the favorite platform for running test suites. It has generated positive leads from the company data by offering the necessary testing support. It is easy to integrate with other applications to suit business demands. The system generate results from various testing suites that can shared with our clients.
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    PractiTest
    • Test Reporting
    • Defect Management
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Celoxis
    • Everyone in the team can go and read how to perform a specific test and note down the result of it which can be viewed by anyone
    • We can filter based on results understanding what test cases are failing from previous runs
    • Helps save a lot of time, effort and minimises future issues
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    PractiTest Screenshots

    Product screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshot

    Tuskr Screenshots

    Screenshot of Progress MonitoringScreenshot of Create Flexible test casesScreenshot of Distribute Workload