TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    PractiTest

    Score8 out of 10
    N/APractiTest is presented as a cloud-based test management tool that provides its customers with an end-to-end system to meet testing and QA needs. It is described by the vendor as flexible but methodological, enabling organizations to ensure visibility and communication at all levels. The solution aims to help users and project development teams streamline and manage their testing processes, while providing management with a clear and simple view of their project status at all times.

    $39

    user

    Ranorex Studio

    Score7.8 out of 10
    N/AOver 14,000+ users worldwide automate tests with Ranorex Studio, which promises to enable rapid delivery of high-quality desktop, mobile, and web applications. The vendor says that with over 10 years in test automation, Ranorex Studio supports automating functional UI tests for even the most challenging technologies, from legacy applications to the latest web and mobile platforms. Ranorex Studio is an all-in-one tool that empowers everyone on the team. Key benefits and…

    $890

    per additional endpoint

    Pricing
    PractiTestRanorex Studio
    Editions & Modules
    Professional
    $39.00
    user
    Enterprise
    $49.00
    user
    Runtime Floating Licnse
    $890
    per additional endpoint
    Premium Node-Locked License
    $2,990
    per installation
    Premium Floating License
    $4,990
    per concurrent user
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    PractiTestRanorex Studio
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalOptional
    Additional Details—All licenses are perpetual and include 12 months of maintenance and email support. A runtime floating license requires at least one premium license for test creation. Please contact our sales team for information about possible volume discounts and options for enterprise support. Consulting, integration and training services are available from our partners worldwide.
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    PractiTestRanorex Studio
    Test Management
    Comparison of Test Management features of PractiTest and Ranorex Studio
    Feature
    PractiTest
    8.5
    4 Ratings
    5% above category average
    Ranorex Studio
    6.4
    2 Ratings
    23% below category average
    Centralized test management9.24 Ratings8.02 Ratings
    Map tests to user stories8.44 Ratings5.01 Ratings
    Test execution reporting8.44 Ratings4.02 Ratings
    Defect management8.03 Ratings7.01 Ratings
    Manage test hosts and schedules00 Ratings8.02 Ratings
    User Ratings
    PractiTestRanorex Studio
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.7
    (4 ratings)
    1.0
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    PractiTestRanorex Studio
    Likelihood to Recommend
    PractiTest
    PractiTest works GREAT as a test case repository. It is very easy to gather metrics, filter, and sort based on custom fields. We were able to work with the API to pull our automation results in as well. The support team is always very quick with their responses and monitors the "in-app chat." They are very open to answering questions, providing best practice materials, and looking for additional feedback. If you already have a central location for all of your test cases and testing needs, then I guess you probably wouldn't need to add another. However, PractiTest has high capability and potential, so if it's set up properly you can easily save time managing your tests.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ranorex
    Personally I rate it a 10 from my own experience, but from a company perspective, I would drop that to perhaps an 8. This is because while I have fun while finding it extremely easy to use and comprehensive enough, there have been times that relative to the project currently in works, Ranorex has not performed due to its shortcomings. If asked though I would certainly fully recommend Ranorex to a potential user, especially to someone less skilled in this field.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    PractiTest
    • Effective Test case template.
    • Can integrate with different Atlassian products.
    • Report generation.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ranorex
    • Initial setup.
    • User guide.
    • Getting money from customers.
    Read full review
    Cons
    PractiTest
    • Linking the defect with Jira throws an error quite some times which can be improved in the future.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ranorex
    • Language support is limited, c# and Vb.net only if i remember correctly compared to other tools which allow many more. This addition would certainly be appreciated if added on in a company like mine with a variety of differently skilled individuals
    • Paid license. This is not always preferred. A free version without a limited trial but maybe limited features would be appreciated.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    PractiTest
    The chat button is available to anyone who logs into PractiTest. In my experience, the support has always been very quick, very friendly, and very thorough. They make sure that your question is answered in a way that you understand it. They also provide documentation of best practices so you are never left hanging on what to do next.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ranorex
    I suppose my experience is sort of mixed. Help documents are substantially helpful. I personally have not got the quickest responses from Ranorex support but at the same time, they are pretty good with updating their users frequently with info about their product/s and features. The community is really where I find support and I suppose that could look to be an extension of the product itself.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    PractiTest
    I've used many different Test Case Repository tools, and while each of them has its perks, I like the capabilities of PractiTest best. When creating a test in qTest for example, you can only input information into the fields provided, and you have everything set up in a folder tree structure. With PractiTest, we are able to create custom fields and filter our tests based on those fields to provide more accurate information in a readily available format while quickly searching for the filter instead of through a folder tree. TestRail did not appear to meet our needs as a company. It just didn't have the potential that we found with PractiTest. Zephyr for example worked seamlessly with Jira, which is really nice since that is what we use for the most part. However since we cater to many different clients, we needed an external Test Case repository so we could use something that wasn't tied to 1 Jira instance.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ranorex
    We have used Selenium as well. This has picked up more steam than Ranorex if i have to be honest.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    PractiTest
    • Test Reporting
    • Defect Management
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ranorex
    • We were left without a working solution so the whole project had to been stopped.
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    PractiTest Screenshots

    Product screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshot

    Ranorex Studio Screenshots

    Screenshot of Ranorex Studio delivers all-in-one test automation for desktop, web, and mobile applications.Screenshot of Ranorex Studio integrates with leading solutions in your toolchain for test management, version control, issue tracking, and more.