Plone is a free and open source content management system built on top of the Zope application server. Plone can be used for any kind of website, including blogs, internet sites, webshops, and internal websites.
N/A
Progress Sitefinity
Score 6.9 out of 10
N/A
Progress Sitefinity is a content management and customer analytics platform. It supports content management, tailored marketing, multi-channel management, and ecommerce sites.
N/A
Pricing
Plone
Progress Sitefinity
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Plone
Progress Sitefinity
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Plone
Progress Sitefinity
Features
Plone
Progress Sitefinity
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Plone
8.0
Ratings
1% below category average
Progress Sitefinity
8.1
Ratings
1% below category average
Role-based user permissions
8.00 Ratings
8.10 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Plone
8.5
Ratings
11% above category average
Progress Sitefinity
8.1
Ratings
3% below category average
API
9.00 Ratings
8.10 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language
8.00 Ratings
8.10 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
Plone
8.0
Ratings
4% above category average
Progress Sitefinity
8.0
Ratings
5% above category average
WYSIWYG editor
8.00 Ratings
8.10 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness
8.00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Admin section
7.00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Page templates
10.00 Ratings
8.10 Ratings
Library of website themes
8.00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design
7.00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Publishing workflow
8.00 Ratings
8.10 Ratings
Form generator
8.00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Plone
7.8
Ratings
6% above category average
Progress Sitefinity
8.0
Ratings
10% above category average
Content taxonomy
7.00 Ratings
8.10 Ratings
SEO support
10.00 Ratings
8.10 Ratings
Bulk management
5.00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Availability / breadth of extensions
8.00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Community / comment management
9.00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Plone
Progress Sitefinity
Small Businesses
ManageWP
Score 10.0 out of 10
Bloomreach - The Agentic Platform for Personalization
The larger your organization, the more appropriate Plone will be. This is not to say that Plone is a worse choice for small websites, only that the minimum investment for a Plone site is certainly higher than for other platforms. If you already use Plone for your site and are looking for a redesign or an overhaul, I would only advise switching to a different platform such as WordPress or Drupal if your organization is downsizing. For any other situation, Plone is the natural choice for your growth.
It's one of the easiest to use, easiest to customize CMS system available on the Microsoft technology stack. Whenever there's an application need for user management, role-based permissions, workflows and page-content, it is simply not done to start custom development from scratch. For complex 'factory-approaches' its architectural implementation shines brightest and allows for hybrid deployments, full Azure DevOps integration and ensures security and governance are not sacrificed
Once templates and custom data has been defined, it is very easy for CMS authors/editors to manage content on the site without knowledge of HTML programming.
Programming templates and custom module and extending the CMS is fairly straightforward for our development team.
Security is in the forefront, with regular updates and enhancements to the product.
Working with support is great, they have extensive knowledge on the product are able to assist if called upon.
Product utilizes .net standards, and also integrates well will standard front end tools such as jquery/bootstrap.
Bullets and formatting sometimes make it difficult to add text to an existing paragraph. The 'code' button is useful in those cases, but only to those who know html.
Sometimes the pages don't save correctly and you use information.
Uploading and displaying images is a bit too much work.
Diagram or illustrate more use cases for server setups, and managing of upgrades.
I'd like to see the ability to synchronize from one server to multiple others at once.
Implementation assistance as part of the purchase rather than farming out to 3rd party, although they did answer every question we asked in order to determine our best architecture setup.
Plone has been used for more than ten years and it already has an interesting roadmap for its future. I do not know any other open source CMS with the same story of continuous evolution and security track. Interesting new features are added at each release and new modules are created continuously
Compared to the amount of Plone sites, users and customizations we have in our organization, the amount of support requests and training needed is really small.
The new user interface in Plone 6 is even better, it is super fast, has lots of different blocks for enhancing the page, has flexible layout system and is easy to extend with more features.
Very big fan of this CMS, as it allows scalability, performance, and everything else. The support is great whenever we need it. As a marketer, the digital/marketing side of things is very easy to use and we've seen strong results from an SEO and marketing perspective. I can't speak to the developer/creative side too much, but in talking with these teams, they do recommend the tool as well.
Our Plone sites are very robust. We have critical systems on Plone and we have been running sites on Plone for over 20 years with very little unexpected downtime.
Plone is very intensive in its operations, and if not configured well it can be slow. However it is designed and built with speed in mind and with proper use of coding, templates and caching can perform extremely well under high loads. It is capable of scaling to very high load availability environments with no specific coding requirements.
Support can be pretty good, even though, depending on the level of licensing, it can take longer to hear back from their team. They do have a phone option, which works well. Overall, they are knowledgeable, and helpful when needed. At times, support is able to access the system directly and troubleshoot critical items when needed.
N/A - I was not part of the implementation team. We have had this internally for over 5 years. Based on my experience, ensure that you have documentation on the initial implementation and subsequent upgrades. I would also recommend to have all the documentation on how and why the system was implemented the way it was
Plone is much harder to learn then Wordpress. Development in Wordpress is learnt in day's, where development in Plone really takes years to get to the full depth. That said, once you're able to develop in Plone, is it a rock solid system, with readable code. In my experience Wordpress websites need to be updated so often, and the code feels bad organised. I have been building Wordpress websites, choosing Wordpress only when the client has almost no money. But I can never deliver the quality I want to deliver when using Wordpress. Plone does offer the possibility to deliver professional websites. As for Joomla, in the past I have done some Joomla development, but the whole CMS-paradigm could not settle in my brain. Being a web developer for over 15 years now, Joomla always felt contra-intuitive. Let alone the task of teaching this to my clients. Plone is now my only choice. It gives me a fast development-cycle, a user-friendly CMS and a rock stable and very secure system.
We evaluated a range of other platforms before selecting Progress Sitefinity. While many other platforms had a powerful range of features, Progress Sitefinity provided to be a comparable product at a price far more suited to our budget. Above all else, its ease of use gained the highest scores in our testing, and the interface has continued to develop and improve over the past three years.
We thought that tapping into the user/content management tooling of Plone would be a good and useful thing, however it turned out to be a major pain to tie into those parts of Plone.
I wish we would have built the extra functionality completely outside Plone and found a way to integrate it. It would have been much easier.