Independently Invited by TrustRadius
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GitHub | Score9.1 out of 10 | N/A | GitHub is a platform that hosts public and private code and provides software development and collaboration tools. Features include version control, issue tracking, code review, team management, syntax highlighting, etc. Personal plans ($0-50), Organizational plans ($0-200), and Enterprise plans are available. | $4 per month per user |
Plastic SCM | Score8.2 out of 10 | Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees) | Plastic SCM is a full stack version control system that aims to make software configuration easy. It focuses on enabling dev teams get work done by facilitating branching, diffing and merging. The vendor says that for those purposes it provides cross-platform apps and GUIs with: Branch explorer Diffing and merging tools (both syntactic and semantic) On-premises and cloud repo management Code review mergebots (last mile… | $6.95 per user |
| GitHub | Plastic SCM | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | * Educational institutions receive a substantial discount on Plastic SCM licensing fees * Corporate/volume pricing is available * For more information, please contact sales at sales@codicesoftware.com | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| GitHub | Plastic SCM | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
96% Would buy again 44 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
98% Delivers good value for the price 43 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
98% Happy with the feature set 45 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
95% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 35 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 39 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| GitHub | Plastic SCM | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Version Control Software Features |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| GitHub | Plastic SCM | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Git Score10 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | Git Score10 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Enterprises | Perforce P4 Score7.8 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| GitHub | Plastic SCM | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.0 | 8.4 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 10.0 | - |
| Usability | 10.0 | - |
| Support Rating | 8.8 | - |
| GitHub | Plastic SCM | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Plastic SCM Screenshots |