Planview Viz vs. Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Planview Viz
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Tasktop Viz is a value stream analytics software from Tasktop.N/A
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Enterprise Architect is the flagship architecture management platform from global, Australian-headquartered company Sparx Systems.
$229
per license
Pricing
Planview VizSparx Systems Enterprise Architect
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Professional
$229
per license
Corporate
$299
per license
Unified
$499
per license
Ultimate
$699
per license
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Planview VizSparx Systems Enterprise Architect
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Planview VizSparx Systems Enterprise Architect
Best Alternatives
Planview VizSparx Systems Enterprise Architect
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.6 out of 10
IBM Blueworks Live
IBM Blueworks Live
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.6 out of 10
IBM Blueworks Live
IBM Blueworks Live
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.6 out of 10
IBM Blueworks Live
IBM Blueworks Live
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Planview VizSparx Systems Enterprise Architect
Likelihood to Recommend
8.9
(4 ratings)
9.0
(5 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.5
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
Planview VizSparx Systems Enterprise Architect
Likelihood to Recommend
Planview
It is ideal for value stream mapping in:- - Software development ie agile and devops, and CI/CD pipelines - Portfolio management - Process improvement and workflow automation - scaling agile - creating alignment with business objectives and IT goals It is less appropriate for:- - Technical analysis and product design
Read full review
Sparx Systems
Enterprise Architect can be used to capture business requirements, design and management of all successive models, algorithms, process flows/workflows, design of business data objects and other artifacts. The strong point is the ability to link the items in all models with each other, the more time the analysts and designers "invest" into making nice and clearly defined models, the higher the future pay-off by any successive changes to the systems. Enterprise Architect is not a good tool for capturing rather unstructured business requirements, use e.g. Confluence or other solutions instead. EA should comprise the extracted models with very little unstructured information. Management of the changes process should not be done in Enterprise Architect, rather use JIRA/Confluence or similar.
Read full review
Pros
Planview
  • Visualize via charts and graphs
  • Ignore story points
  • Allow a great detail of customization
Read full review
Sparx Systems
  • Open Architecture - A wide and extensive set of options, plug-ins and customization options make Sparx EA more of a tool kit than just a tool. Most tools allow customization but Sparx EA is built from the ground up with this in mind.
  • Wide variety of formats, lexicons, standards and data import export capabilities allow different roles to interact with the information in different ways.
  • Automated report generation allows architects and designers to spend less taking on word processing and more time on performing architecture and design.
Read full review
Cons
Planview
  • Better UX and UI
  • Better reporting capabilities which are self-service and automated
  • Improved administrative capabilities as a Planview Viz user
Read full review
Sparx Systems
  • Needs someone that is very conversant with business modelling terminology
Read full review
Support Rating
Planview
No answers on this topic
Sparx Systems
The support team of Sparx EA, based in Australia, is always willing to help and give direction.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Planview
Much more advanced and customizable than iterations of the above tools I've used. But more focused on Flow metrics than others. And more complex, IMO.
Read full review
Sparx Systems
BiZZdesign represents a different new concept to enterprise architecture, its gravity center is not technical modelling, but rather a view on capturing the whole end-user experience or customer journey. It also allows to grasp areas as internal company capabilities, required for adoption/changes and operation of the solution, uses the same Archimate modelling language. This solution is in my opinion a new generation enabling to not only design the solutions, but also manage the whole application portfolio with respect to capabilities and requirement parameters.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Planview
  • Expect it to increase speed
  • Expect it to increase productivity
  • Expect it to improve predictability
  • Expect it to improve visibility
  • Expect it to improve ROI
Read full review
Sparx Systems
  • This program speed up the development process. It generates the actual code with my model classes after modeling
Read full review
ScreenShots

Planview Viz Screenshots

Screenshot of Portfolio Insights consolidates the highlights from a product line, portfolio, group, or department.Screenshot of The Flow Metrics dashboard visualizes and measures product value streams. Out-of-the-box metrics and analytics reveal problem areas, illuminate dependencies, and guide investment to improve speed, velocity, and quality.Screenshot of The Flow Modeler is a visual layout of the end-to-end workflow of an entire value stream, from customer request to customer delivery. Flow Modeler builds the value stream map directly from the data in the user's tools and shows in real-time where bottlenecks are emerging.Screenshot of An easy-to-read Neglected Work Work in Progress (WIP) graph alerts you when value streams have taken on more work than they can deliver.Screenshot of Business-aligned visibility into value delivery aligns teams to measurable outcomes. Flow Metrics alone do not help an organization accelerate value delivery - they must be evaluated against business results. Business and technology teams can work toward a single set of goals and align around a joint set of outcomes.