AgilePlace is a project management solution built around flexibility, data-driven analytics, and workflow automation. The software was acquired by Planview in December 2017 to expand that company's capabilities.
$19
per user, per month
Runrun.it
Score 2.0 out of 10
N/A
RunRun.it is a project management solution built around task management to drive productivity.
$0
Pricing
Planview AgilePlace
Runrun.it
Editions & Modules
Teams
$19
per user, per month
Scaled Teams
$29
per user, per month
Custom
Contact Sales for Quote
per user, per month
Free
$0
Business
$8
per month per user
Enterprise
$25
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Planview AgilePlace
Runrun.it
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
All editions include unlimited boards.
14 days free to evaluate the software with up to 100 employees in your account. After this period ends, our plans are pre-paid, which means that the client makes the payment before using the software.
More Pricing Information
Features
Planview AgilePlace
Runrun.it
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Planview AgilePlace
7.4
Ratings
3% below category average
Runrun.it
-
Ratings
Task Management
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Resource Management
9.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Gantt Charts
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Scheduling
9.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology
9.30 Ratings
00 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology
4.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Document Management
6.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email integration
7.30 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile Access
2.10 Ratings
00 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking
6.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Change request and Case Management
7.20 Ratings
00 Ratings
Visual planning tools
7.30 Ratings
00 Ratings
Agile Development
Comparison of Agile Development features of Product A and Product B
AgilePlace is a great way for teams, or individuals, to bring visibility to the work in process and in their backlog. The color coding and icon use helps to quickly analyze the type of work or status of the work. The product team is doing a good job at listening to their user's feedback and implementing improvements. Where it falls short is when reporting needs to occur.
Apropriado para gestão de tempo, organização de demandas e planejamentos, tanto de forma micro quanto de alta gestão. Inapropriado para trabalhos colaborativos na área de geração de ticket. Falta um canal de comunicação mais fluído e com mais ferramentas de suporte. Provavelmente uma interface com o hangout ou chats do e-mail cadastrado facilitassem essa comunicação. Suitable for time management, organization of demands, and planning, both on a micro level and high management. Inappropriate for collaborative work in the area of ticket generation. There is a lack of a more fluid communication channel and more support tools. Probably an interface with Hangouts or email chats would facilitate this communication.
Okta Integration: We love using SSO for all our SaaS apps, and as new team members join, they can be automatically joined to the appropriate LeanKit boards.
Filtering and viewing: Can filter and refine by several fields as well as custom fields. Assigned Users, Tagged, Card Type, Date, etc
Their analytics and reporting can be helpful for PMs, especially if they have several teams they oversee.
LeanKit isn't the best designed Kanban system I've seen, but overall it's pretty usable. The boards I've used are pretty complex, so it can be difficult to find things. I found that searching and filtering for specific cards was somewhat of a challenge. Dragging a card from one lane to another is kind of a fun way to get things done though.
Every time I have reached out to the AgilePlace support team I have received a timely response in addition to professional & personal feedback. Their consultants are knowledgeable and the management team is happy to jump in and help when needed.
Originally, we had evaluated two other tools next to Planview LeanKit: Kanbantool and Kanbanflow. The latter was a close contestant for productive use, as it was also very customizable and a joy to work with and look at. It also had lower user fees and a mobile integration. In the end, we picked Planview LeanKit because of several reasons: Aesthetics: The look was much more clean and professional. Reporting: It was obvious from the start that we could use Planview LeanKit as a tool for improvement. API: We needed to integrate the Kanban into our central systems and Planview LeanKit API was (and still is) a way to do it. Card Headers: This sounds like a simple thing, but the headers above the titles fit our work perfectly and looked perfect, which helped the decision.