Planview AgilePlace vs. PTC Windchill RV&S

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Planview AgilePlace
Score 9.9 out of 10
N/A
AgilePlace is a project management solution built around flexibility, data-driven analytics, and workflow automation. The software was acquired by Planview in December 2017 to expand that company's capabilities.
$19
per user, per month
PTC Windchill RV&S
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
PTC Windchill RV&S (formerly Integrity Lifecycle Manager of the Integrity suite) is an MBSE (model-based systems engineering) suite. The former Integrity suite contains an Asset Library which supports systems-of-systems approach to design (i.e. linking models into higher-level models that subsume them), a Process Director which is designed to articulate, manage and improve the design process, and a Modeler for visualizing and controlling the product design process. The Integrity suite is…N/A
Pricing
Planview AgilePlacePTC Windchill RV&S
Editions & Modules
Teams
$19
per user, per month
Scaled Teams
$29
per user, per month
Custom
Contact Sales for Quote
per user, per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Planview AgilePlacePTC Windchill RV&S
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsAll editions include unlimited boards.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Planview AgilePlacePTC Windchill RV&S
Features
Planview AgilePlacePTC Windchill RV&S
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Planview AgilePlace
7.4
Ratings
3% below category average
PTC Windchill RV&S
-
Ratings
Task Management10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Resource Management9.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Gantt Charts10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Scheduling9.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology9.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology4.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Document Management6.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Email integration7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Access2.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking6.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Change request and Case Management7.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Visual planning tools7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Agile Development
Comparison of Agile Development features of Product A and Product B
Planview AgilePlace
8.8
Ratings
7% above category average
PTC Windchill RV&S
-
Ratings
DevOps Tool Integrations8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Dependencies and Blockers9.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Planview AgilePlacePTC Windchill RV&S
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.8 out of 10
Enterprises
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Planview AgilePlacePTC Windchill RV&S
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.6
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
8.3
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.8
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
7.7
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Configurability
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
9.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
9.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Planview AgilePlacePTC Windchill RV&S
Likelihood to Recommend
AgilePlace is a great way for teams, or individuals, to bring visibility to the work in process and in their backlog. The color coding and icon use helps to quickly analyze the type of work or status of the work. The product team is doing a good job at listening to their user's feedback and implementing improvements. Where it falls short is when reporting needs to occur.
Read full review
We enjoy doing requirement mappings. The enhancement in transferring them between models is great. It is for innovation all the time a challenge to conduct them. We have two major scenarios for that task set. One is to integrate already well-validated models into greater sets. The other is defining totally new ones. We developed new strategies and refined the existing ones. We rate the synching requirement configurations as comfortable. The processes of synching the items back to the models. The major advantage is to optionally synchronize all-important and intended traceability relationships from Modeler so that both can be given the correct right the right group of uses while others only see the structures. We too prefer the handling of deletion and creation. It is a real advantage how the mapping and relation are implemented. The implemented integration to third-party tools for requirements definition and management is a plus. We like the profiling features and the high compliance to industrial standards as well as the module variability modeling.Windchill RV&S makes us perform better and let us take over control. It enhances our return-of-investment efficiencies to the top. The only drawbacks are the high skill levels needed and the necessary relation in businesses to make the profits. Another topic is the resources that are needed.
Read full review
Pros
  • Okta Integration: We love using SSO for all our SaaS apps, and as new team members join, they can be automatically joined to the appropriate LeanKit boards.
  • Filtering and viewing: Can filter and refine by several fields as well as custom fields. Assigned Users, Tagged, Card Type, Date, etc
  • Their analytics and reporting can be helpful for PMs, especially if they have several teams they oversee.
Read full review
  • It allows the user the ability to link all aspects of the SDLC together so that there is only one source of documentation and information rather than having to search in multiple places.
  • It is very customizable to suit a particular businesses needs.
  • It is helpful for all areas of software development.
Read full review
Cons
  • The formatting of what they call "cards" could be better. They can be clunky if you have a lot of text in just one.
  • Needs better support for media, attachments.
  • Not the most pretty interface in my opinion, though it works.
Read full review
  • Main trunk is not protected and has no pre-conditions before committing a fix or feature to it.
  • Conducting reviews is not possible. there is no avenue for people to comment on a check in
  • When working with multiple snadboxes, the client seems to freeze up and needs to be started.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
we are happy with the tool and the service and continuos improvement of the tool so there is no need yet to change to another one.
Read full review
I do not make decisions on what tool my company uses. I am just the user of the tool and such decisions are not handled by me. If I were to make such decisions, I would definitely renew MKS, considering the amount of data we have stored in MKS and the current number of users who are familiar with the system
Read full review
Usability
LeanKit isn't the best designed Kanban system I've seen, but overall it's pretty usable. The boards I've used are pretty complex, so it can be difficult to find things. I found that searching and filtering for specific cards was somewhat of a challenge. Dragging a card from one lane to another is kind of a fun way to get things done though.
Read full review
PTC Integrity comparatively could be considered a nice Source code management, Version controlling tool and could be compared with tools like StarTeam. If the integration to move/migrate code could be integrated into this tool, it would become an extremely powerful tool.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Not experienced any outage
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
Larger boards take longer to load
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Every time I have reached out to the AgilePlace support team I have received a timely response in addition to professional & personal feedback. Their consultants are knowledgeable and the management team is happy to jump in and help when needed.
Read full review
PTC Integrity administration can be somewhat daunting. They have been able to help with every question that I have submitted. Their support website is very easy to understand and submit questions and their phone support is wonderful
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Very easy.
Read full review
I wasn't involved in implementation.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Originally, we had evaluated two other tools next to Planview LeanKit: Kanbantool and Kanbanflow. The latter was a close contestant for productive use, as it was also very customizable and a joy to work with and look at. It also had lower user fees and a mobile integration. In the end, we picked Planview LeanKit because of several reasons: Aesthetics: The look was much more clean and professional. Reporting: It was obvious from the start that we could use Planview LeanKit as a tool for improvement. API: We needed to integrate the Kanban into our central systems and Planview LeanKit API was (and still is) a way to do it. Card Headers: This sounds like a simple thing, but the headers above the titles fit our work perfectly and looked perfect, which helped the decision.
Read full review
There are some tools which are available for free like GitHub. I've used StarTeam when it was a product of Borland, and while using PTC Integrity, I feel PTC Integrity has most of the features which were available in StarTeam. Although there are some other free tools like Tortoise SVN, it's always better to stick with tools which are licensed and supported in case of any issues/problems.
Read full review
Scalability
Good use cases for small/large teams
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Our team meetings are more direct and quick to get through thanks to the better visibility of the workload
  • Easily being able to move cards between team lanes gives instant visibility to where the responsibility for the next step is needed.
Read full review
  • Better requirements through PTC Integrity - which will equate to better products and less warranty costs (very large savings).
  • Better efficiency ....PTC Integrity can help keep track of a globally managed project structure. This will go far in helping keep repeat and duplicate efforts from happening multiple times.
  • Better products for our customers through a more attentive corporate ear. PTC Integrity can help make customer wants and needs a reality.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Planview AgilePlace Screenshots

Screenshot of Real-Time Analytics: Utilize board health metrics involving bottlenecks, WIP, and throughput to guide the optimization of workflows, improve velocity, and better prioritize efforts for more predictable delivery. Lean and Agile metrics can be used to assess team performance and promote continuous improvement.Screenshot of PI Planning: Offers enterprise Kanban boards to visualize the work of teams regardless of the methodologies they apply or workflows they follow, and insights into progress and create opportunities for better alignment.Screenshot of Dependency Visualization and Management: Surfaces risks to plans resulting from cross-team dependency conflicts, blockers, and capacity constraints, and helps drive proactive measures to enable teams to deliver on time.Screenshot of Team Planning and Coordination: Boards can be used to breakdown work, build and manage plans, and execute against strategy to deliver more value to customers, faster.