Planview AdaptiveWork vs. Structure by Tempo
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Planview AdaptiveWork | Score7.4 out of 10 | N/A | Planview AdaptiveWork is a web-based collaborative work management software. Planview AdaptiveWork enables users to connect employees and partners and create documents, reports and specialized workflow automation. Planview AdaptiveWork is designed to work across multiple teams to enable cross-company task, project, and resource management. | N/A |
Structure by Tempo | N/A | N/A | Structure for Jira, based on technology acquired by Tempo with ALM Works, is a ppm tool that enables users to visualize multiple Jira projects, programs, and portfolios in one place, so as to align execution with strategy. Structure’s hierarchies and spreadsheet-like views help users control their entire portfolio. It can be used for essential tasks across Jira teams and projects, such as project planning, reporting, sprint planning, and release management. | $10 per month per user |
| Planview AdaptiveWork | Structure by Tempo | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Planview AdaptiveWork | Structure by Tempo | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
93% Would buy again 25 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
95% Delivers good value for the price 21 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
89% Happy with the feature set 24 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
81% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 13 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
83% Implementation went as expected 15 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Planview AdaptiveWork | Structure by Tempo | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Autotask PSA Score8.9 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | Kantata PS Cloud Score8.4 out of 10 | Microsoft Project Server Score7.6 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Workday Professional Services Automation Score9 out of 10 | Planview PPM Pro Score8.9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Planview AdaptiveWork | Structure by Tempo | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.4 | - |
| Likelihood to Renew | 7.5 | - |
| Usability | 7.3 | - |
| Availability | 8.2 | - |
| Performance | 9.1 | - |
| Support Rating | 9.1 | - |
| In-Person Training | 8.2 | - |
| Online Training | 5.4 | - |
| Implementation Rating | 8.2 | - |
| Configurability | 8.0 | - |
| Ease of integration | 8.2 | - |
| Vendor post-sale | 9.1 | - |
| Vendor pre-sale | 9.1 | - |
| Planview AdaptiveWork | Structure by Tempo | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
| No answers on this topic |
| Pros |
| No answers on this topic |
| Cons |
| No answers on this topic |
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Reliability and Availability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Performance |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| In-Person Training |
| No answers on this topic |
| Online Training |
| No answers on this topic |
| Implementation Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
| No answers on this topic |
| ScreenShots | Planview AdaptiveWork Screenshots |








