TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Pipefy

    Score7.5 out of 10
    N/APipefy headquartered in San Francisco offers their process management and workflow software providing processes for customer success, service desk, sales operations, and other processes.

    $22

    per month

    ProcessMaker

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AProcessMaker is a process automation platform that helps organizations optimize and scale their business operations. By combining workflow automation, AI-driven decision-making, and advanced analytics, ProcessMaker empowers businesses to streamline complex processes, improve efficiency, and enhance customer experiences.N/A
    Pricing
    PipefyProcessMaker
    Editions & Modules
    Business
    $22
    per user, per month*
    Enterprise
    $36
    per user, per month*
    Unlimited
    Custom
    Starter
    Free
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    PipefyProcessMaker
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details*Discounts available for annual billing.—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    PipefyProcessMaker
    Considered Both Products
    Pipefy
    No answer on this topic
    ProcessMaker Inc.
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    78%
    Would buy again
    7 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    83%
    Delivers good value for the price
    5 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    89%
    Happy with the feature set
    8 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    6 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    7 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    PipefyProcessMaker
    Reporting & Analytics
    Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Pipefy and ProcessMaker
    Feature
    Pipefy
    -
    Ratings
    ProcessMaker
    9.3
    6 Ratings
    14% above category average
    Dashboards00 Ratings10.06 Ratings
    Standard reports00 Ratings9.06 Ratings
    Custom reports00 Ratings9.06 Ratings
    Process Engine
    Comparison of Process Engine features of Pipefy and ProcessMaker
    Feature
    Pipefy
    -
    Ratings
    ProcessMaker
    9.2
    6 Ratings
    25% above category average
    Process designer00 Ratings10.06 Ratings
    Process simulation00 Ratings10.05 Ratings
    Business rules engine00 Ratings8.06 Ratings
    SOA support00 Ratings9.06 Ratings
    Process player00 Ratings9.05 Ratings
    Form builder00 Ratings9.75 Ratings
    Model execution00 Ratings9.05 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    PipefyProcessMaker
    Small Businesses
    airSlate WorkFlow
    Score7.5 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    CMW Platform
    Score8.8 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
    Score9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    ServiceNow Now Platform
    Score9.2 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
    Score9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    PipefyProcessMaker
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.2
    (10 ratings)
    9.0
    (6 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.5
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    PipefyProcessMaker
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Pipefy
    Pipefy is very well suited if you have a team doing any sort of process... for real! It simplified everything from our sales and marketing objectives/processes, to our onboarding and accounting side of things. Since you can share different pipes with others, it's easy to see where others are at in the process and move the card along while keeping others informed. It makes sure you don't miss any information or steps along the way, which is great if your process is detail-oriented. It is a little less appropriate for marketing efforts, but we still try to use it to keep track of things in a central space. Definitely best suited for sales, technical things, and accounting.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ProcessMaker Inc.
    The task mining component is well suited for processes where there are a lot of steps performed in a variety of systems, particularly by a single individual on a team. It also requires a robust activity ID to be able to track an activity. It is not well suited when trying to track a process where the content is in an email.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Pipefy
    • Flexibility on process management.
    • Internal automations and connections to different data bases and boards.
    • Easily connection with external programs through API's.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ProcessMaker Inc.
    • User interface. It is clean and easy to understand. You won't get overwhelmed the second you log in.
    • The workflow maker. With a drag and drop interface, you can easily visualize and implement what you want on the screen. Out of all the programs we tested, this one had the easiest process maker and designer.
    • Ease of understanding. My biggest recommendation would be that this program is easy to access for anyone. There are complications (see negatives) but this program can be implemented quickly and efficiently, and nearly anyone can learn to use it. You will not feel like you are in the dark with it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Pipefy
    • I would like to be able to add a due date without a time attached.
    • I would like to see completed tasks be deleted after a set amount of time.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ProcessMaker Inc.
    • Complications when you get to the more advanced pieces. When trialing, I found that the more advanced a process got, the more complicated it got for me in coding. When you begin using the more advanced features, you will find that you need to have a basic knowledge of coding - otherwise you won't go any further. This was my sole issue. Unfortunately, it was one that would have brought the school to a grinding halt if they were to ever get more complicated than they were.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Pipefy
    No answers on this topic
    ProcessMaker Inc.
    I gave this overall rating for ProcessMaker due to its overall flexibility, design and ease of use for most. Examples of this from us include it being an excellent and trustworthy tool for automating processes, the abilities and capabilities for real-time process tracking and the web-based accessibility and implementation which allows for easy access and management of the tool.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Pipefy
    Pipefy support is pretty good. There were a few instances where the agent didn't really understand what I was trying to get help with, but that was only once. Every other time it has been pretty fast and efficient. They are also very kind and understanding. I don't think they need much help in that dept
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ProcessMaker Inc.
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Pipefy
    We started using software we already had (such as Slack and Sheets) but this software is not actually ideal to manage processes, which led to errors, miscommunication, and execution problems. Trello is good for managing demand but offers no process customization or approval and Jira is too focused on development for our needs, and also hard to customize.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ProcessMaker Inc.
    Before making the decision to get ProcessMaker, we assessed different and best options in the market, which are also quite competitive. KiSSFLOW, Blueworks Live, and Bizagi, being the most relevant and ADONIS, to mention the ones we consider the most relevant and capable of meeting our needs. In the end, we went for ProcessMaker because of mainly three things as described before: 1. Real-time process status tracking. 2. Metrics and dashboards. 3. Ease of use for constructing diagrams.
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Pipefy
    No answers on this topic
    ProcessMaker Inc.
    The capability is robust and quite industry agnostic. It would benefit significantly with some out of the box models - e.g. procure to pay on SAP and similar. They could also develop industry specific examples which could kickstart the implementation for organizations.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Pipefy
    • Our processes are more organized and we are not missing any steps.
    • We are able to touch base with customers easier since we have all potential/missed clients in one pipe, with automated alerts (i.e. it has been 60 days since contact with this customer).
    • We are able to keep track of customer billing changes easier.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ProcessMaker Inc.
    • I'm using Communication edition to introduce BPMN in my organization. I can build the first process in a short time, make my boss more confident with my job.
    • But, with ProcessMaker, we need more time to design code to handle the process, and without PHP/Javascript Programmer, it seems hard to work with more and more processes online.
    • However, IE Browser is not well supported, somewhat let the user confuse.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots