PCLaw vs. Time Matters

PCLaw is well suited for small to medium sized law firms with minimal accounting and bookkeeping needs. The software provides basic case management functions, and I've encountered issues with viewing or organizing new documents. The software crashes and freezes often, especially when multiple users are trying to access it at the same time. The user interface is a bit outdated but still very easy to navigate. You have to pay more for the cloud-based version of the software and it does not allow software integrations or workflow automations. I would recommend using this software only for billing/accounting purposes and subsidizing case management with more modernized products

When we first started with Time Matters, there were very few other options and it fit the bill. But it didn't really progress with the times and there is now a need for synching with IPhones that was not envisioned back then. Additionally, the number of users is limited to what you purchased and it is not simple to just pay to add a user if a company grows. They MANDATE that you have a service contract which is costly and may not be necessary, and if you want to upgrade to a newer version, they insist that you pay for the contract RETROACTIVELY (!!!) without having use of it.

Incentivized

• Link to practice management software to synchronize clients.
• Provide structured and organized system for accounting.
• Excellent tool for capturing time entries and keeping employees accountable.

Incentivized

• It stores data that the law firm uses.
• It really doesn't do anything really well, so it is hard to answer this question.

Incentivized

• Generating bills sometimes comes with errors that are not easy to identify
• Troubleshooting errors in billing is sometimes tricky
• No other issues!

Incentivized

• The program would benefit from better customer support.
• The program would be stronger by providing for more detailed roles, which you could assign to different users.
• The program would benefit by being easier to integrate with non-Lexis products. Sometimes this crosstalk causes issues.

Incentivized

The software may not be pretty, but it works. It could use a facelift but the functionality is still there. Personally, I would like to see an investment to make it prettier, but again, function over fashion. It is not a client-facing application, so internal use does not need to be razzle-dazzle.

Incentivized

I've always had positive phone calls with PCLaw support. I usually have my questions answered within a few minutes of my phone call, and rarely have to go into very much detail

Incentivized

There is no unpaid support. They insist on a service contract for support, either with the manufacturer, or with a re-seller.

Incentivized

PC Law is quicker and cheaper. With CosmoLex, I found that I waited a little longer for reports and documents to generate and for transactions to be saved. In all other areas, I found CosmoLex to be better as it is more intuitive to use and the user interface is clean and easy to use. CosmoLex does not provide a receipt when receiving funds for some reason, which is something that I like about PC Law. When entering data, you can enter the data for multiple entries at a time whereas with CosmoLex, you enter the data for one transaction/billing/expense/etc, and then you have to save it before going on to do another entry. This doesn't take too long, but there is often a delay of a few seconds which is very frustrating when you are used to the speed of PC Law.

So Juris and TM are both LexisNexis products. I dislike Juris greatly and the only thing we use it for is billing because we already had it and it was compatible with TM for billing purposes. Juris doesn't allow you any kind of document storage or management. You can make a "note" but what good does that really do me? In my opinion, Juris is good for billing only (not client management) and there are other options like QuickBooks that really outshine it.

Incentivized

• We are able to send out bills efficiently, which helps our cash flow and keeps receivables down (depending on the client).
• We are able to pull detailed accounting reports, which helps us populate our end of the quarter/year spreadsheet for partner's net income.
• Our attorneys are very comfortable with the pre-bill/billing process, so it saves them time, allowing them to bill more.

Incentivized

• We had to spend over $100,000 to customize Time Matters to work correctly with our medical malpractice and mass tort teams because the out of the box solution didn't work for both teams. Consultant costs are then required to maintain the customizations with each version upgrade.
• I feel that we did not get any ROI on the licensing renewal costs because support is bundled with it and the Lexis Nexus support team wouldn't support of system because we used SQL replication.
• Migration Costs to leave Time Matters for a cloud solution were high because of the complexities of the Time Matters software.

Incentivized