Paymo is a collaborative work management platform that helps track team progress, collaborate in context, and make smarter decisions. It acts as a single source of truth, where project planning, resource scheduling, file proofing, time tracking, and billing feed into each other to co-exist under the same roof.
$0
Up to 10 users
Planview AgilePlace
Score 9.9 out of 10
N/A
AgilePlace is a project management solution built around flexibility, data-driven analytics, and workflow automation. The software was acquired by Planview in December 2017 to expand that company's capabilities.
$19
per user, per month
Pricing
Paymo
Planview AgilePlace
Editions & Modules
Free
$0
Up to 10 users
Small Office
$11.95
per user/per month
Business
$18.95
per user/per month
Teams
$19
per user, per month
Scaled Teams
$29
per user, per month
Custom
Contact Sales for Quote
per user, per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Paymo
Planview AgilePlace
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Free version available for freelancers.
All editions include unlimited boards.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Paymo
Planview AgilePlace
Features
Paymo
Planview AgilePlace
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Paymo
5.9
Ratings
26% below category average
Planview AgilePlace
7.4
Ratings
3% below category average
Task Management
3.50 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Resource Management
5.30 Ratings
9.90 Ratings
Gantt Charts
4.40 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Scheduling
7.00 Ratings
9.90 Ratings
Team Collaboration
4.10 Ratings
00 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology
7.80 Ratings
4.00 Ratings
Document Management
5.00 Ratings
6.50 Ratings
Email integration
5.00 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
Mobile Access
5.30 Ratings
2.10 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking
9.00 Ratings
6.40 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management
8.80 Ratings
00 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology
00 Ratings
9.30 Ratings
Change request and Case Management
00 Ratings
7.20 Ratings
Visual planning tools
00 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
Paymo
9.2
Ratings
20% above category average
Planview AgilePlace
-
Ratings
Quotes/estimates
8.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Invoicing
9.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project & financial reporting
8.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Agile Development
Comparison of Agile Development features of Product A and Product B
Well suited: tracking time, making notes to share with clients, live reporting. Less so: tracking and bookkeeping - they don't market it as a bookkeeping app, though they do allow for invoicing through it. Still, my needs are such that I use a separate app for tracking receipts against a project and then invoicing clients.
AgilePlace is a great way for teams, or individuals, to bring visibility to the work in process and in their backlog. The color coding and icon use helps to quickly analyze the type of work or status of the work. The product team is doing a good job at listening to their user's feedback and implementing improvements. Where it falls short is when reporting needs to occur.
Okta Integration: We love using SSO for all our SaaS apps, and as new team members join, they can be automatically joined to the appropriate LeanKit boards.
Filtering and viewing: Can filter and refine by several fields as well as custom fields. Assigned Users, Tagged, Card Type, Date, etc
Their analytics and reporting can be helpful for PMs, especially if they have several teams they oversee.
The main area for improvement is exportability of data. It's tough to get full data out of Paymo. You can export most things in CSV format, but if you were to start with Paymo and want to switch to another project management and accounting platform, there would be substantial manual effort involved.
There also aren't as many integrations for Paymo as some of the more mainstream project management suites. This isn't necessarily Paymo's fault. It's just a function of them still being one of the "little guys." Something to be aware of before you select this platform though.
It is a complete, a bit overambitious app but with many features that are needed. I didn't need most of the features but managed to make the most of the two I was using. Also, I think it is a well-rounded app and I am considering moving some team collab there.
LeanKit isn't the best designed Kanban system I've seen, but overall it's pretty usable. The boards I've used are pretty complex, so it can be difficult to find things. I found that searching and filtering for specific cards was somewhat of a challenge. Dragging a card from one lane to another is kind of a fun way to get things done though.
Good! Fast, excellent, speedy responses. They always wanted to know why and how they could improve on something (good on receiving feedback, too). Not that they were much needed, but my limited experience with them is good; they were really keen to understand what the problem was really about and how they could help with it.
Every time I have reached out to the AgilePlace support team I have received a timely response in addition to professional & personal feedback. Their consultants are knowledgeable and the management team is happy to jump in and help when needed.
Similar in almost all project management aspects... Paymo seems to have a slight edge in invoicing and reporting. They are also adding new features regularly so that (in our opinion) makes the investment worth it. Customer support has also been terrific. Easy onboarding process and we found this solution the easiest to get started doing actual work with.
Originally, we had evaluated two other tools next to Planview LeanKit: Kanbantool and Kanbanflow. The latter was a close contestant for productive use, as it was also very customizable and a joy to work with and look at. It also had lower user fees and a mobile integration. In the end, we picked Planview LeanKit because of several reasons: Aesthetics: The look was much more clean and professional. Reporting: It was obvious from the start that we could use Planview LeanKit as a tool for improvement. API: We needed to integrate the Kanban into our central systems and Planview LeanKit API was (and still is) a way to do it. Card Headers: This sounds like a simple thing, but the headers above the titles fit our work perfectly and looked perfect, which helped the decision.