PandaDoc vs. SAP CPQ
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PandaDoc | Score9 out of 10 | N/A | PandaDoc headquartered in San Francisco offers their eponymous electronic signature platform for sales teams, containing sales proposal automation and CPQ (configure, price, quote) features, and integration with CRMs. | $35 per month per seat |
SAP CPQ | Score6 out of 10 | N/A | SAP CPQ (replacing the former CallidusCloud CPQ solution) has been built to be independent of any CRM. The vendor says that this makes their solution more flexible. The vendor also says their solution provides businesses the flexibility to customize and enhance the solution without the constraints of CRM code. Pricing and product catalog changes can also be made by the users without having to rely on a CRM administrator. | N/A |
| PandaDoc | SAP CPQ | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | PandaDoc offers a free eSign plan and 3 paid packages for eSigning and document automation. All plans include unlimited documents and eSignatures. Evaluations start with a free 14-day trial. Up to a 46% discount for annual pricing. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| PandaDoc | SAP CPQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
96% Would buy again 216 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
98% Delivers good value for the price 199 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
96% Happy with the feature set 215 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
98% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 172 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
97% Implementation went as expected 177 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| PandaDoc | SAP CPQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Foxit eSign Score9.8 out of 10 | QuoteWerks Score9.4 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | MSB Docs Score9.4 out of 10 | QuoteWerks Score9.4 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Conga Sign Score7.8 out of 10 | Salesforce Revenue Cloud Score8.8 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| PandaDoc | SAP CPQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.0 | - |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.1 | - |
| Usability | 8.3 | - |
| Availability | 9.1 | - |
| Performance | 9.6 | - |
| Support Rating | 6.1 | - |
| Implementation Rating | 6.3 | - |
| Configurability | 2.8 | - |
| Ease of integration | 9.0 | - |
| Product Scalability | 8.6 | - |
| Vendor post-sale | 9.7 | - |
| Vendor pre-sale | 6.7 | - |
| PandaDoc | SAP CPQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
| No answers on this topic |
| Pros |
| No answers on this topic |
| Cons |
| No answers on this topic |
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Reliability and Availability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Performance |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Implementation Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
| No answers on this topic |
| Scalability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
| No answers on this topic |
| ScreenShots | PandaDoc Screenshots | SAP CPQ Screenshots |











