TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    N-able N-central

    Score8.9 out of 10
    N/AMSPs and IT professionals use N-able™ N-central® to monitor and manage devices and complex networks remotely. N-central provides visibility and efficiency as the user's needs scale. N-central can help users: 1. Proactively monitor everything on a customer network—not just servers and workstations—and troubleshoot. 2. Stay on top of threats with features like MFA, antivirus, integrated endpoint detection and response, data backup, disk encryption, email protection,…N/A

    Panda Systems Management

    Score9.8 out of 10
    N/APanda Security now offers system monitoring, client-less device management, patch management, and other capabilities via Panda Systems Management.N/A
    Pricing
    N-able N-centralPanda Systems Management
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    N-able N-centralPanda Systems Management
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    N-able N-centralPanda Systems Management
    Considered Both Products
    N-able
    No answer on this topic
    WatchGuard Technologies
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    73%
    Would buy again
    11 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    79%
    Delivers good value for the price
    11 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    80%
    Happy with the feature set
    12 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    60%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    6 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    77%
    Implementation went as expected
    10 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    N-able N-centralPanda Systems Management
    Monitoring Tasks
    Comparison of Monitoring Tasks features of N-able N-central and Panda Systems Management
    Feature
    N-able N-central
    7.4
    6 Ratings
    0% below category average
    Panda Systems Management
    9.1
    3 Ratings
    20% above category average
    Remote monitoring9.76 Ratings10.03 Ratings
    Network device monitoring8.36 Ratings10.03 Ratings
    Activity Monitoring00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Management Tasks
    Comparison of Management Tasks features of N-able N-central and Panda Systems Management
    Feature
    N-able N-central
    9.0
    7 Ratings
    19% above category average
    Panda Systems Management
    9.4
    3 Ratings
    23% above category average
    Patch Management9.07 Ratings10.03 Ratings
    Policy-based automation00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
    Application Performance Management
    Comparison of Application Performance Management features of N-able N-central and Panda Systems Management
    Feature
    N-able N-central
    -
    Ratings
    Panda Systems Management
    9.0
    1 Ratings
    20% above category average
    Virtualization monitoring00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    IT Asset Discovery00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Remote Access
    Comparison of Remote Access features of N-able N-central and Panda Systems Management
    Feature
    N-able N-central
    -
    Ratings
    Panda Systems Management
    9.4
    1 Ratings
    32% above category average
    Attended device access00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Unattended device access00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Mobile device access00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Virtual device access00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Multiple concurrent sessions00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    N-able N-centralPanda Systems Management
    Small Businesses
    Panda Systems Management
    Score9.8 out of 10
    NinjaOne
    Score9 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    N-able N-sight RMM
    Score8.7 out of 10
    N-able N-sight RMM
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    N-able N-centralPanda Systems Management
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.7
    (25 ratings)
    10.0
    (3 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    7.3
    (7 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    1.0
    (8 ratings)
    7.0
    (2 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    8.4
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    N-able N-centralPanda Systems Management
    Likelihood to Recommend
    N-able
    N-Able is perfect for an MSP environment. It gives all the standard functionality an IT professional needs out of the box and can be configured to show almost anything required. For example, we have configured a dashboard to show when our backups need attention for each customer. This is achieved by running a small script on repeat via N-Central everyday/evening, and the result gives us information on the dashboard to help us identify exactly what is working and what needs looking into.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    WatchGuard Technologies
    Panda Systems Management is well suited for small to medium sized organizations looking for a tool to centralize asset management not only physical but also assist with rapid deployment of patches, applications, etc. It proves also to be very beneficial as permits (to and extent) to do troubleshooting without interfering or interrupting end users.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    N-able
    • Remote tasks - entry-level techs can run basic tasks without physically touching a piece of equipment.
    • Remote support - remote controlling user devices is easy and saves a lot of time with having to initiate a remote session.
    • Management of devices, particularly patch management and anti-virus management - you can automatically approve and deploy patches and schedule automatic AV scans.
    Read full review
    WatchGuard Technologies
    • Remote access. It's as good as any other on the market. It also allows for RDP connections which is a nice feature.
    • Inventory management. We get some great insight from the reports we can run.
    • Quick Jobs. If there's an app or service you use, there may be a quick job to install and update it remotely.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    N-able
    • Customer support just points to online guides and I feel they aren't helpful.
    • During the trial they turn on a lot of features. In my experience, if you play around with the features, they charge you for them. Keep this in mind if you move forward with N-Able - they will charge for "trialed" services.
    • In my experience, some services that you're being charged for can't be disabled or monitored by you or your team. You only see them on the monthly invoice.
    • In my opinion, the "Scripting Automation" doesn't provide value. You're either going to be writing your own batch or Powershell to make scripting work.
    • In my opinion, monitoring software deployments is painful.
    • The default monitoring template can't be duplicated, edited, or referenced. You'll find that the default monitors in an unusual way and will throw needless recurring alerts into your ticketing system. To avoid this, you need to create a template from scratch which takes many hours to set up.
    • In my opinion, they're more concerned about a quick buck than customer service. "Buyer beware" company.
    Read full review
    WatchGuard Technologies
    • Licensing. With the possibility of monthly splitting
    • Integration with firewalls even outside the corporate network
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    N-able
    Overall we have liked our solar winds experience, however, as our company has grown to support larger enterprises, this product does not have the functionality that our teams need in order to fully support them. The lack of granularity with backups and lack of ability to support nutanix environments is slowly drawing us into the use of other tools.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    WatchGuard Technologies
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    N-able
    The user interface is fairly straight forward, with logic groupings for objects. I did not deploy this software, but am one of the daily administrators. Once you get the correct agent package (Which can be a challenge) the integration into AD is not bad. The UI could be more customized, but that may have been a design choice.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    WatchGuard Technologies
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    N-able
    Every time we have reached out to SolarWinds they are quick to respond, even offering support chat 24/7. Their support team is great and works with you to find solutions to issues. They have taken items we had issues with before and used those to create updates so that the issue is handled better in the future.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    WatchGuard Technologies
    We rate and recommend Panda Systems Management not only because it is a very effective and very cost effective solution that pays itself for us (ROI) extremely fast, but also due to all reason described previously and possibly a few more I'm sure we missed here. I do have to says tech support for this solution sometimes leave a bit to be desired.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    N-able
    Make sure if you your using a vm you follow the instructions for provisioning to the letter or it will be starting from square one
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    WatchGuard Technologies
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    N-able
    Our version of SolarWinds was old and running on old hardware, but it was way easier to setup and do things with. It did not do everything N-able does such as patch management, or at least we didn't have a module to do so if one existed. However it definitely seemed easier to use and possibly more stable.
    Read full review
    WatchGuard Technologies
    Panda is a bit of a greatest hits between some of these other things. I feel like GoToAssist has a stronger remote support option, but Panda is more convenient. Kaseya has a ton of features, but from an ease of use standpoint, Panda seems stronger. Spiceworks has a fine inventory system but it lacks features. I added Azure as well since we are a 365 shop and Azure supplies a lot of the same visibility that Panda does. However it is a completely different animal, and it's way easier to hop into Panda and get what you need than get waaay more data than necessary from Azure/Azure AD/ATP.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    N-able
    • We have lost hundreds of hours on the phone/emailing support with no resolution for any of our issues
    • We had to move all of our services away which was very painful
    • Staff satisfaction was low having to deal with this company
    Read full review
    WatchGuard Technologies
    • It has facilitated us in the management of controls on the various clients, reducing the cost of human resources
    • Thanks to the alerts, in case of intrusion, it is possible to intervene promptly
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    N-able N-central Screenshots

    Screenshot of N-able N-central DashboardScreenshot of Remote desktop access with Take Control