TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Palo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WAN vs. SD-WAN Concierge

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Palo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WAN

    Score7.8 out of 10
    N/APrisma SD-WAN (formerly known as CloudGenix but now as Prisma from Palo Alto Networks since being acquired in April 2020) offers an Autonomous SD-WAN solution, designed to provide app-policies aligned to business intent, along with direct access to multi-cloud and dev-ops frameworks to deliver unparalleled productivity gains, and cost-savings compared to first generation SD-WAN alternatives.N/A

    SD-WAN Concierge

    Score1 out of 10
    N/AWindstream offers SD-WAN Concierge, a software-defined WAN solution which includes security policy, proactive monitoring and optimization, centralized management of routing policy, and other application and access management and optimization features.N/A
    Pricing
    Palo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WANSD-WAN Concierge
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Palo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WANSD-WAN Concierge
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    Palo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WANSD-WAN Concierge
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Cisco Meraki SD-WAN
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Cisco Meraki SD-WAN
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN
    Score8.7 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Palo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WANSD-WAN Concierge
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Palo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WANSD-WAN Concierge
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Palo Alto Networks
    CloudGenix would be suited for any company that has an internet connection if you have multiple sites you could use this to help with network traffic and what should take precedence over other applications. If you didn't have various sites, you could go with another type of internet connection.CloudGenix may not be suited for that scenario.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Windstream
    The underlying product (Velocloud) is not the issue, Windstream is. Anything this company touches turns to crap.
    Read full review
    Pros
    Palo Alto Networks
    • Circuit Monitoring
    • QOS of network traffic
    • High Availability
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Windstream
    • Failover is easy, no single point of failure, provided you have the bandwidth.
    Read full review
    Cons
    Palo Alto Networks
    • Some warning messages are hard to pinpoint the actual issue.
    • Support was faster at first, seems to not be as quick as in the beginning.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Windstream
    • While the product may work decently once implemented, Windstream is a constant roadblock.
    • Trouble issues need to be escalated before people will bother to work on them.
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Palo Alto Networks
    The support was super fast in the beginning. Sometimes it seems now that the support does not get back to you as quickly. When we do get in contact with the support, they are usually knowledgeable and can help find the problem. The support has also been easy to work with.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Windstream
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Palo Alto Networks
    We evaluated Silverpeaks and Cisco. We found that CloudGenics' had a pricing model that met our needs. The sales team we worked with went over our existing environment thoroughly to provide the right size solution without compromising or limiting our technology needs. While the overall solutions form each vendor would have worked, we simply believed CloudGenic was the right fit for our company based on price, sales, support, and functionality.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Windstream
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Palo Alto Networks
    • Reduced Down time
    • Improved throughput due to their intelligent data analytics
    • Full utilization of all data circuits
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Windstream
    • One outage on our main site cost over 500K in lost revenue for a day, Windstream was unapologetic for failing to set a QOS policy right during cutover.
    • We needed to get a building re-wired to get the install at one location going. Windstream said, let us quote it... It took them 2 months to get us a quote that was 4x higher than a local provider. Thankfully, this didn't impact the deployment schedule.
    Read full review
    ScreenShots