Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs. Torq

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Score 7.1 out of 10
N/A
Cortex XSOAR, formerly Demisto and now from Palo Alto Networks since it was acquired in March 2019, provides orchestration to enable security teams to ingest alerts across sources and execute standardized, automatable playbooks for accelerated incident response. Its playbooks are powered by hundreds of integrations and thousands of security actions, striking the right balance between rapid machine execution and nuanced human oversight.N/A
Torq
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Torq's no-code security automation platform (formerly known as StackPulse) helps its users to improve their security posture, responding faster to risks wtih triggered workflows, and with less manual work. It also helps users shift to a proactive security stance by aiming to eliminate risk false positives and replacing reactive work.N/A
Pricing
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOARTorq
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOARTorq
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOARTorq
User Ratings
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOARTorq
Likelihood to Recommend
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOARTorq
Likelihood to Recommend
XSOAR is well suited for phishing detection and response. Phishing alerts are as much of a
problem today as they were decades ago. This is because: ●Attackers Can leverage automation to launch high-quantity phishing attacks with the click
of a button.
●Spear Phishing attacks are sophisticated and sometimes indistinguishable from real
emails, resulting in compromise through human error.
●Security Teams aren’t able to follow set processes while responding to phishing alerts.
They must coordinate across email inboxes, threat intel, NGFW, ticketing, and
other tools. Each tool has different consoles, data conventions, and contexts,
making it difficult for security teams to fill in the gaps while minimizing
errors. XSOAR is less suited for analyzing traffic.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • Automation with immediate security responses.
  • Comprehensive phishing protection and increased email protection.
  • Analysis and reporting feature.
  • Intuitive and easy-to-view panels.
  • Alerts by email and sms of incidents for the administration.
  • Centralized monitoring.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • SAML is not stable, it gives a lot of issues.
  • Pre-defined playbooks need a lot of fine tuning
  • Lacks proper documentation
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew
It has proven to be far to valuable and effective to consider getting rid of it. Until something better comes along, this is staying in our product stack.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
It was much easier than we all anticipated.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
The quantity of integrations with security solutions is highest in Palo Alto Solution. The capacity to identify anomalous events is much better in Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR. The flexibility of increased storage area is better as well. The dashboard is very intuitive about showing the most important incidents and how to resolve them.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Reduces man-hours spent on handling false-positive repetitive alerts, daily 40% of analysts' time saved during a 24 hour period. In the initial stage, it was 75% of analysts' time saved due to the new environment, less maturity, and a lot of un-finetuned alerts.
  • Single pane for notification, collaboration, and action (to some extent) which is a major time saver compared to the conventional method of meeting invites and emails back-and-forth.
  • Secure documentation of business-critical incidents with a need-to-know basis of access according to each role.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots