TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR vs. TEHTRIS XDR Platform

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR

    Score8.4 out of 10
    N/ACortex XDR (formerly Traps) replaces traditional antivirus with multi-method prevention, a proprietary combination of malware and exploit prevention methods that protect users and endpoints from known and unknown threats.N/A

    TEHTRIS XDR Platform

    Score7 out of 10
    N/ATEHTRIS, headquartered in Pessac, offers their eponymous XDR platform, providing the XDR infrastructure to bring together several security solutions within a single platform, capable of detecting and responding to security incidents.N/A
    Pricing
    Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDRTEHTRIS XDR Platform
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDRTEHTRIS XDR Platform
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDRTEHTRIS XDR Platform
    Considered Both Products
    Palo Alto Networks
    No answer on this topic
    TEHTRIS
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    89%
    Would buy again
    8 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    88%
    Delivers good value for the price
    7 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    89%
    Happy with the feature set
    8 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    86%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    6 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    88%
    Implementation went as expected
    7 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Best Alternatives
    Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDRTEHTRIS XDR Platform
    Small Businesses
    Sophos Intercept X for Server
    Score7.3 out of 10
    Sophos Intercept X for Server
    Score7.3 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    InsightIDR
    Score9.5 out of 10
    InsightIDR
    Score9.5 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Kaspersky EDR Optimum
    Score9.2 out of 10
    Kaspersky EDR Optimum
    Score9.2 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDRTEHTRIS XDR Platform
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (13 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    7.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    10.0
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDRTEHTRIS XDR Platform
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Palo Alto Networks
    Malware that doesn’t leave files behind has become widely available. Anyone who can afford to reverse this trend should purchase technology. Application whitelisting isn’t for everyone, and Palo Alto Networks Traps can help. Enterprises looking for a low-affected, next-generation solution with high protection should consider it. PAN Traps is a great product at a reasonable price, and I highly recommend it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TEHTRIS
    The primary reason for looking for this program was the accessibility that we had to find all the support functions. In later updates, I think that the UI UX was de-implemented making the search more difficult. I think it is necessary that the teams that use the product are well trained so that the UI UX is not a bother. 7.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Palo Alto Networks
    • Direct Access to devices via Live Terminal which provides operations with scripting, triage, and preservation of artifacts.
    • Behavioral Indicators of Compromise which provides alerts on events regarding groups of hosts and their signatures.
    • Querying complex data sets involving a variety of devices for network connections, hashes, DNS, etc.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TEHTRIS
    No answers on this topic
    Cons
    Palo Alto Networks
    • Traps doesn't seem to function as a traditional A/V very well, so it's better as another layer to your endpoint protection
    • Traps can cause issues with some legacy or custom programs, so exceptions may have to be made
    • Traps falsely identifies things as malicious at times, this is not often though
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TEHTRIS
    • CET business hours are the only time that the SOC is open to the public.
    • A few difficulties in distributing data.
    • Intuitive UX Dashboard.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Palo Alto Networks
    Cortex XDR does a very good job of blocking suspicious and threatening items. However, as with all software of this nature, it will sometimes block known-good items. The difficulty is in manually whitelisting these known-good items. The interface to whitelist is confusing even for a seasoned IT professional and has been the single most frustrating experience of using Cortex XDR
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TEHTRIS
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Palo Alto Networks
    The support we receive from Palo Alto is one of the best aspects of Traps. It is very easy to recommend their support. It seems much easier to connect directly with someone with a deep understanding of the product rather than other companies where you basically have to make an airtight case that it is some kind of non-standard issue that can't be solved with existing documentation. Palo Alto digs deep and helps with advanced troubleshooting to get things working.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TEHTRIS
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Palo Alto Networks
    Traps is the slickest interface, easy to use and intuitive rule making, and the rest just didn't quite stack up to the performance level of Traps. McAfee and Kaspersky just hog processor and RAM power. I didn't like the interface and functionality of SentinelOne as much as Traps. Palo Alto really put a lot of time into the development of this software, and had some of the founding fathers of IT Security heading the development process. Can't beat that.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TEHTRIS
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Palo Alto Networks
    • After putting Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR on a user's system, users came back with a positive response that there are no performance issues now.
    • We are able to track and control granular suspicious and malicious activities.
    • Web controls are missing, which if they would have been there would have been very helpful.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TEHTRIS
    • Violations resolved in 100% which is incredible.
    • Costs falling in the long run.
    • I think it has increased the unity of the team due to the ease of understanding its tools.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR Screenshots

    Screenshot of a Cortex XDR overviewScreenshot of a view of the Cortex XDR dashboardScreenshot of a view of the Cortex XDR dashboardScreenshot of a view of the Cortex XDR dashboard