TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus vs. Symantec DeepSight

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AAutoFocus™ contextual threat intelligence service, from Palo Alto Networks, accelerates analysis, correlation and prevention workflows. Targeted attacks are automatically prioritized with full context, allowing security teams to respond to critical attacks faster, without additional IT security resources.N/A

    Symantec DeepSight

    Score8.9 out of 10
    N/ASymantec DeepSight Intelligence is provides timely, actionable threat intelligence enabling trams to assess risk and implement proactive controls.N/A
    Pricing
    Palo Alto Networks AutoFocusSymantec DeepSight
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Palo Alto Networks AutoFocusSymantec DeepSight
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    User Ratings
    Palo Alto Networks AutoFocusSymantec DeepSight
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (4 ratings)
    7.5
    (2 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Palo Alto Networks AutoFocusSymantec DeepSight
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Palo Alto Networks
    Analytics, Threat Hunting and detailed investigations for the security incidents are the main use cases. Automation on the cloud based on the feeds through the minemeld is another use case. When you deploy PAN on perimeter, Autofocus gives you a temendaous value. If you have non PAN firewall/products running Auto focus doe not make sense.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Broadcom
    It is good to monitor viruses and threat detection in our systems and it does provide detailed information on the detected threat. Email and phone alerts can be configured to keep us updated. It does get updated frequently. Pricing is high only top-level license has every feature. Customer support can be improved.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Palo Alto Networks
    • Threat intelligence
    • Emerging Threats
    • Intelligence feeds
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Broadcom
    • User Friendly console
    • Malware , Threat prevention
    • Email and phone alerts are very useful
    • Deepsight feeds provide more information to analyze threats.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Palo Alto Networks
    • third party product integration
    • simplicity of the managment console
    • integration to cortex agents directly
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Broadcom
    • Prices seems to be very high , Only top tier plans have all features.
    • Customer support needs to be improved, They do take a long time to reply back to queries.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Palo Alto Networks
    If you have Palo Alto, autofocus is the selected choice. If you have Checkpoint than the threat cloud. Price of autofocus is much cheaper. Unit42 is the real differentiator. Minemeld is unique to PAN and working perfectly. Search outputs and are detailed and gives lots of data. Integration with SOAR is much easier with autofocus. Indicator list is huge. Tagging works magnificent.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Broadcom
    We do come across multiple security tools but we get more information and security on Symantec deep sight.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Palo Alto Networks
    • Cheap for us
    • Easy integration
    • Easy management
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Broadcom
    • It does provide good security to our systems
    • We do get proper service for what we pay.
    • Symantec mitigates security threat to our network
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots