Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus vs. Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
AutoFocus™ contextual threat intelligence service, from Palo Alto Networks, accelerates analysis, correlation and prevention workflows. Targeted attacks are automatically prioritized with full context, allowing security teams to respond to critical attacks faster, without additional IT security resources.N/A
Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud
Score 9.7 out of 10
N/A
Recorded Future is an intelligence company. Its Intelligence Cloud provides coverage across adversaries, infrastructure, and targets. Combining persistent and pervasive automated data collection and analytics with human analysis, Recorded Future provides visibility into the digital landscape, enabling countries and organizations to take proactive action to disrupt adversaries.N/A
Pricing
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocusRecorded Future Intelligence Cloud
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocusRecorded Future Intelligence Cloud
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocusRecorded Future Intelligence Cloud
Features
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocusRecorded Future Intelligence Cloud
Threat Intelligence
Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Product A and Product B
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
-
Ratings
Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud
6.7
Ratings
11% below category average
Network Analytics00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Threat Recognition00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Vulnerability Classification00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Automated Alerts and Reporting00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Threat Analysis00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Threat Intelligence Reporting00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Automated Threat Identification00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
User Ratings
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocusRecorded Future Intelligence Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
6.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocusRecorded Future Intelligence Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend
Threat intelligence is the best approach for this tool, recommended if you have Palo alto firewalls on your perimeter as well or if you are familiar with Palo alto products, If you are looking for something more actionable and with more integrations options you might want to search for something else.
Read full review
Recorded Future is mainly beneficial to the SOC. As part of the Monitoring team, Recorded Future makes the investigation of the alarms a lot easier for me. It can show the reputation of the IP/domain or even hashes which helps me redirect my focus to potentially malicious network activities.
Read full review
Pros
  • The ability to have quick access to the Palo Alto Networks threat intelligence repository is a big value add
  • Each threat is enriched with a lot of contextual information
  • Guidance on TI use cases
Read full review
  • Searching across multiple sources at the same time
  • Indexing information in real time
  • Dashboards, statistics and heatmaps about a certain topic
Read full review
Cons
  • Views are cumbersome, you should know what to search and use the input
  • It's solely to PaloAlto environment I can't integrate other vendors natively
  • Application integrations is limited, you should have your own SOAR to automaion
  • Concerns related to privacy, I can't hash some values or variables on the cloud
  • Sharing option of the datas with cloud has limited configuration
  • It's aimed for strata, I don't see data coming/analyzed or integration for the prisma cloud side.
Read full review
  • For the Browser extension, since the main purpose is to present information with regards to the IP, I think it's best to give us an idea of where the IP originated/some additional information about the organization it belongs to.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
I've had an issue with their browser-plugin which didn't want to authenticate correctly. RF's support could arrange for a session with me and identify and solve the issue. I was very pleased how serious they took my problems and also how knowledgeable they are.
If I have more general questions they quickly reply and most likely also have a solution at hand.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
If you have Palo Alto, autofocus is the selected choice. If you have Checkpoint than the threat cloud. Price of autofocus is much cheaper. Unit42 is the real differentiator. Minemeld is unique to PAN and working perfectly. Search outputs and are detailed and gives lots of data. Integration with SOAR is much easier with autofocus. Indicator list is huge. Tagging works magnificent.
Read full review
It is the most complete solution of these three, as the others are focused in specific areas and having really detailed analysis about threat actors, APT groups, etc. Recorded Future is not having this level of knowledge in really specific areas but doing a really good work covering thousands of sources and the most relevant forums.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • new attacks mitigation
  • less need to hire personal to analyse data
  • increase security level
Read full review
  • We've been able to identify leaked credentials and close those accounts off.
  • We've also been able to identify malware being distributed or spam being sent out by customers using our infrastructure. Again we could shut off those accounts.
  • Their domain-monitoring allows us to identify typo-squats and issue domain-takedowns for those (or at least add them to our monitoring / detection)
Read full review
ScreenShots