Oracle Java SE vs. Supernova

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Oracle Java SE
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Oracle Java SE is a programming language and gives customers enterprise features that minimize the costs of deployment and maintenance of their Java-based IT environment.N/A
Supernova
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
N/A
$35
per month
Pricing
Oracle Java SESupernova
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Basic
$35
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Oracle Java SESupernova
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Oracle Java SESupernova
Best Alternatives
Oracle Java SESupernova
Small Businesses
GraalVM
GraalVM
Score 9.1 out of 10
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GraalVM
GraalVM
Score 9.1 out of 10
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
GraalVM
GraalVM
Score 9.1 out of 10
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Oracle Java SESupernova
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(32 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.4
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(19 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Oracle Java SESupernova
Likelihood to Recommend
Oracle
Oracle Java SE is well suited to long-running applications (e.g. servers). Java Swing (UI toolkit) is now rather outdated, lacking support for modern UI features. JavaFX, the potential replacement for Swing, has now been separated out of Java core. Ideally, there would be a path to migrate a large application incrementally from Swing to JavaFX, but due to different threading models and other aspects, it is difficult. At this point, it is probably better to use an embedded web browser (e.g. JxBrowser) to provide a modern UI in HTML/Javascript and keep just the business logic in Java.
Read full review
Supernova.io
Supernova is the best documentation platform on the market, having tested numerous alternatives, including the more popular zeroheight, Knapsack, etc. It's ideal for low-code solutions for brand guidelines and detailed component documentation. Their automated exporter pipelines are the icing on the cake, enabling them to pull what you see in Figma and push it directly into your codebase.
Read full review
Pros
Oracle
  • Plenty support built into the tool and IDE like Maven, Ant, Eclipse, IntelliJ.
  • Strong object-orientation language and clear project structure.
  • Wrapper underlines hardware and memory management so the developers can focus on business and implementation.
  • It offers a huge library and framework support from third-parties and the community.
Read full review
Supernova.io
  • Customer service.
  • Automation
  • Organization
Read full review
Cons
Oracle
  • Commercial Licensing in 2019. Oracle will charge commercial organizations using Java SE for upgrading to the latest bug fixes and updates. Organizations will now need to either limit their implementation of Java SE or may need to drop it altogether.
  • Slow Performance. Due to the all of the abstraction of the JVM, Java SE programs take much more resources to compile and run compared to Python.
  • Poor UI appearance on all of the major GUI libraries (Swing, SWT, etc.). Through Android Studio, it is easy to get a native look/feel for Java apps, but when it comes to desktops, the UI is far from acceptable (does not mimic the native OS's look/feel at all).
Read full review
Supernova.io
  • Difficult to sync large files (more of a Figma problem).
  • Restrictive paid tiers.
  • Redundant features.
Read full review
Usability
Oracle
The language is fluent and has good support from a number of open source and commercial IDEs. Language features are added every 6 months, although long-term service releases are only available every 3 years. It would be nice if some of the older APIs were depreciated with more pressure to move to the new replacement APIs (e.g. File vs. Path), but transitions to new features are generally well implemented.
Read full review
Supernova.io
It is occasionally buggy, but nowhere near as buggy as zeroheight.
Read full review
Support Rating
Oracle
Java is such a mature product at this point that there is little support from the vendor that is needed. Various sources on the internet, and especially StackOverflow, provide a wealth of knowledge and advice. Areas that may benefit from support is when dealing with complex multithreading issues and security libraries.
Read full review
Supernova.io
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Oracle
Chose to go with Java instead of Python or C++ due to the expertise on the ground with the technology, for its ease of integration with our heterogeneous setup of production servers, and for the third party library support which we've found was able to address some challenging aspects of our business problem.
Read full review
Supernova.io
Supernova has best-in-class customer service. Our Figma library is a huge file and was unable to automatically sync with most platforms (including Supernova) - of all three platforms we tried, Supernova was the only one that actively assigned engineers to our case and offered a solution within a couple of days. They've been great partners.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Oracle
  • The different versions make it harder to work with other companies where some use newer versions while some use older versions, costing time to make them compatible.
  • Licenses are getting to be costly, forcing us to consider OpenJDK as an alternative.
  • New features take time to learn. When someone starts using them, everyone has to take time to learn.
Read full review
Supernova.io
  • We've seen a massive increase in organizational design system adoption since launching our Supernova site.
Read full review
ScreenShots