Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, or Oracle Taleo, is a cloud HCM solution with Talent Management solutions. Its talent management solution includes Recruiting, Onboarding, Learning, Career Development, Opportunity Marketplace, Performance Management, Compensation, Succession Planning, etc.
$4
Per Employee Per Month
Workable
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
Workable is a recruiting software with HR integrations and AI-powered candidate sourcing. It has SEO-optimized job descriptions and one-click advertising across popular job boards. Workable also features communication tracking, real-time syncing, reporting, and mobile accessibility for collaboration.
$360
per month (starting with 1-20 employees)
Pricing
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Workable
Editions & Modules
Help Desk
$4.00
Per Employee Per Month
Talent Management
$10.00
Per Employee Per Month
Global HR
$15.00
Per Employee Per Month
Standard
$360
per month (starting with 1-20 employees)
Premier
$599
per month (billed annually) (starting with 1-20 employees)
Premier
$8148
per year (starting with 1-20 employees)
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Workable
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Required
Optional
Additional Details
Contact Oracle HCM for detailed pricing information at +1.800.392.2999
20% discount for annual pricing on Standard plan. Buyers can also select add-ons for an additional fee.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Workable
Features
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Workable
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
8.7
Ratings
10% above category average
Workable
-
Ratings
Employee demographic data
8.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Employment history
9.10 Ratings
00 Ratings
Job profiles and administration
8.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.
8.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Organizational charting
8.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Organization and location management
8.80 Ratings
00 Ratings
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)
8.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
8.7
Ratings
9% above category average
Workable
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
9.10 Ratings
00 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors
8.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Off-cycle/On-Demand payment
8.30 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
8.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
8.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reimbursement management
8.20 Ratings
00 Ratings
Leave and Attendance Management
Comparison of Leave and Attendance Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
8.9
Ratings
11% above category average
Workable
-
Ratings
Approval workflow
8.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Balance details
8.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Annual carry-forward and encashment
8.80 Ratings
00 Ratings
Employee Self Service
Comparison of Employee Self Service features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
8.8
Ratings
9% above category average
Workable
-
Ratings
View and generate pay and benefit information
8.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Update personal information
8.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
View company policy documentation
8.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Employee recognition
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
View job history
8.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
8.6
Ratings
6% above category average
Workable
-
Ratings
Tracking of all physical assets
8.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
HR Reporting
Comparison of HR Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
8.7
Ratings
15% above category average
Workable
-
Ratings
Report builder
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Pre-built reports
8.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Ability to combine HR data with external data
8.20 Ratings
00 Ratings
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
8.8
Ratings
11% above category average
Workable
-
Ratings
New hire portal
8.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
8.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
8.2
Ratings
4% above category average
Workable
-
Ratings
Corporate goal setting
8.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Individual goal setting
8.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
8.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance tracking
8.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
8.6
Ratings
9% above category average
Workable
-
Ratings
Performance plans
8.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance improvement plans
8.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Review status tracking
8.30 Ratings
00 Ratings
Review reminders
8.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multiple review frequency
8.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
8.5
Ratings
8% above category average
Workable
-
Ratings
Create succession plans/pools
8.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate ranking
8.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate search
8.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate development
8.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
Oracle HCM is very much helpful and well suited in the recruitment and placement process and HR data. It makes it easier for HR in [organizations] to keep track of who is in and out of the [organization]. Improvement can be made by allowing employees to record their own data and update it as and when necessary without having to go through HR first.
Workable is great at creating job posts and posting them to multiple job boards with a single click and also running paid campaigns on social media platforms to reach passive candidates as well. Workable has a friendly UI and has a very gentle learning curve. It is more appropriate for larger organizations where you need to hire thousands of people a year and need to always have a pipeline of great talent.
Workable was extremely user friendly and aesthetically pleasing to use. I had no trouble training or setting up new users, they always caught on quickly.
You are able to quickly review candidates at a glance with all notes, texts or emails sent at the top of their profile. This made jumping into a job order easy for those who may be out of the loop.
Workable's customer support is stellar, they offer free training and very timely responses for any questions or concerns you may have.
Government entities share data readily on applicants and HCM doesn't make it easy to have applications transferred between organizations. If applicants could apply once and send that application to multiple entities that would really make it more appealing to clients. This is a niche that is currently filled with NEOGOV, however Oracle's analytics are far superior to those in NEOGOV
There are no customizations allowed so clients need to work within the configuration standards or create a bolt on. Many times your greatest asset is also one of your biggest weaknesses.
Oracle is a large company and sometimes it can be hard to navigate the support matrix that they have set up. They also have tiers of support so you can pay more to get more, which isn't optimal from a customer point of view.
Candidate timeline history - you could say it's a double-edged sword. I love that I can follow how a candidate has progressed through the process and see all the notes, correspondence, and stage updates on one page, but it's also too much information sometimes. I wish there was a way that I could just filter it to see email history, for example.
Workable going to spam - if you or your client select the option that "hides" your email address in Workable email correspondence, sometimes candidate emails go straight to candidate's spam folders. I try to warn clients and candidates ahead of time about this, but it would be great if it didn't happen at all!
People Search - it's a great tool when it works, but oftentimes it brings up candidate search details that are no longer valid or true (out of date resumes, closed email accounts).
Taleo does what we need it to do and based on the costs from both a time and money perspective, I don't see us changing anytime soon. If anything I think we will look to leverage the capabilities available that we may not already be using.
It's become a part of the fabric of our hiring process and we are growing like crazy! Once we have a working platform in place the cost of the change management typically far out weighs the benefits derived from the change! It's especially hard to change a process with employees who are not key stake holders, they are alway hesitant to invest time in a new product they are only going to use once in a while. With that said if something else came along with benefits far and above workable that we would gain a clear lift in productivity and capabilities we would make the change, we've done it with other parts of our tech stack
After the initial training's, it was quite intuitive to use the application. The application is based upon best practices and the overall flows are quite logical. The train stop approach also ensures that users understand where they are in the process cycle. Also, the number of clicks have been greatly rationalized to ensure that there is more streamlined experience.
One thing, it just works as advertised. AI integration makes the work more easier, and we will be able to process the applications more faster with the help of AI.
It works well. However we recently discovered that it no longer is supported on Internet Explorer so we had to change the default browser for everyone in our organization to MS Edge.
The rating is based upon our current level of support. The overall experience has vastly changed since we moved into product paid support. 'Also, with Oracle going with the model of quarterly patches, it makes sense to have the product company provide support to the overall application thereby eliminating the problems of bugs.
I have never had to rely on Workable's support team so I cannot attest to this. I have never had to rely on Workable's support team so I cannot attest to this. I have never had to rely on Workable's support team so I cannot attest to this.I have never had to rely on Workable's support team so I cannot attest to this. I have never had to rely on Workable's support team so I cannot attest to this.
There is a lot of potential on Fusion. We have reaped about 10% of potential benefits. Especially on Workforce Intelligence, the opportunities are huge. The reason why we do not use the solution at its full potential is not in the product (which is simple and transparent). A roadmap is under construction to bring more of its potential to the end user.
Our prior experience was Evolution Payroll but it didn't meet up our expectations and the kind of excellence we wanted from it. But I would say that Evolution Payroll is another option for those who don’t want to avail multiple tasking and automated employment facilities like the way Oracle HCM Cloud offers.
Workable was an excellent tool for our start-up. It was cost effective but very user-friendly. It wasn't a difficult sell to ensure our hiring managers would utilize the tool, and I particularly liked the inbox feature to stay organized. I rated Workable very highly, though as our company grew exponentially, we did go in a different direction.
We were not good at tracking any numbers around recruiting so now this last year we have been able to set the benchmark that we now can work toward improving.
At any given time, we could not say how many open positions we had. Now we are able to keep track of that.
We do a much better job with communicating with candidates now, especially the ones not selected. This will help us maintain a better reputation and attract the candidates back for other jobs they may be a better fit for in the future.
There is a relatively large improvement in our ROI impact collected in the last few months of using Workable relative to the first few months that the platform was being used to manage the recruitment process.
Such improvement is possibly due to the fact that the results of hiring processes from months ago are being shown directly in the job performance of new employees.