Oracle Audit Vault and Database Firewall vs. Trellix Data Center Security Suite

I think it is well suited for big organizations. Even my place of work is pretty big [and] only part of [my organization] is using it, so it doesn't seem important to management in terms of budgeting and other help. It [should] be better when at least 50% of employees return to the office, [but] it [hasn't] happened yet.

Incentivized

It is well suited for McAfee’s monitoring and virtual patching solutions for huge data and there are more features like automated discovery, port scans, and patch status, password integrity, and protections for database-specific risks.

Incentivized

• Audit control
• Flexibility
• Reporting

Incentivized

• McAfee’s monitoring and virtual patching solutions

Incentivized

• Need to confirm IP addresses are setup correctly when installing and tests are run. Best setup by professional.
• As with any software company, their add-ons work best with their own software.

Incentivized

• There is a area of improvement in cloud version

Incentivized

Due to support issues only.

We did not get much expertise in the limited support extended by the Mcafee team.

Whilst Oracle Audit Vault and Database Firewall Systems were more costly than the closest alternative, there was more ample community support, 3rd party support, more capable functionality for our complex infrastructures, and additional features for audit.

Incentivized

The Forecepoint product which we evaluated was better but this was a decision taken by the entire group.

• It meets audit requirements, so it was a must for us. Overall I am satisfied.
• Expensive, but worth it if your budget permits.
• Less internal audit work.

Incentivized

• It has a positive impact on over data security and helps in managing data.

Incentivized