Aconex is a cloud collaboration platform for the global construction industry which allows the user to quickly find what is needed with a single source of truth for communications, documents, processes, and models. Aconex was acquired and is now supported by Oracle since 2017.
N/A
Zoho Projects
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Zoho Project is online project management and planning software that provides project teams with a web-based collaborative environment. Zoho Projects can also include a bug tracking module specifically design to support software development project. It is integrated with other Zoho products including Zoho CRM.
$0
Pricing
Oracle Aconex
Zoho Projects
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Free
$0
Premium
$5
per month per user
Enterprise
$10
per month per user
Project Plus
Contact Sales
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Oracle Aconex
Zoho Projects
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Optional
Additional Details
—
Discount offered for annual billing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Oracle Aconex
Zoho Projects
Features
Oracle Aconex
Zoho Projects
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Aconex
8.9
Ratings
15% above category average
Zoho Projects
-
Ratings
Dashboards
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
8.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Aconex
8.6
Ratings
13% above category average
Zoho Projects
-
Ratings
Plan distribution & viewing
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue tracking & punchlists
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Photo documentation
8.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Jobsite reports
9.30 Ratings
00 Ratings
Document sharing
8.80 Ratings
00 Ratings
RFI tools
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
As-built drawings
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle Aconex
-
Ratings
Zoho Projects
6.6
Ratings
15% below category average
Task Management
00 Ratings
7.50 Ratings
Resource Management
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Gantt Charts
00 Ratings
6.50 Ratings
Scheduling
00 Ratings
5.50 Ratings
Workflow Automation
00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Team Collaboration
00 Ratings
7.50 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology
00 Ratings
6.30 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Document Management
00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Email integration
00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Mobile Access
00 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking
00 Ratings
7.50 Ratings
Change request and Case Management
00 Ratings
6.90 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management
00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
When it comes to budgeting and also tracking of budgeting, and project scheduling, I effectively recommend Oracle Aconex on that. Safety management and the compliance management processes are quite effective using this platform as well as the easy project activities reporting.
My work involves projects of 5-15 people with numerous projects running simultaneously. Prior to Zoho, I did not have a central location from which to view all project statuses at once. Zoho looks to provide this and also looks like it will deliver. I am anxious to see how our organization's use of it develops. At this time, I feel I am likely to recommend Zoho Projects because my organization has made great software decisions in the past so I have a level of trust already that the research has been done that Zoho is the best solution for our line of work.
File Sharing - unlimited storage, version control and access control on a neutral host - Aconex is significantly superior to ftp, SharePoint or a contractor hosted platform in that once onboarded, each user organization has equal privileges and can in turn onboard any number of members within the respective organizations.
Process and Workflow Management - while imperfect, Aconex offers the opportunity to customize process control and enforcement. Our team used these processes for RFI preparation and response, submittal tracking and other custom requirements.
Neutrality - while mentioned, the neutral host places all project participants on a equal basis. Typically, non-neutral platforms favor in-house participants to the detriment of the project. Until shared, files are 100% private to the respective organizations.
Mobile interface - good (not perfect) access to unlimited project file information from a mobile device.
Audit trail - no more "I didn't get that document". File sharing and file opening is tracked by user. Transmittals are a matter of record and there's no 'delete' function.
Swiss Army Knife: The suite of Zoho projects can be tailored to fit the needs of any business. It's great to have a bunch of different software offerings that will work together seamlessly.
Task Customization: Zoho allows you to customize your tasks more than other platforms (add start dates, due dates, dependencies, subtasks...)
More flexibility on making the user interface more compact (like Excel or MSP). Current interface is well spaced, but some users may like a more compact view.
More simplified Gantt Charts that help us understand progress and dependencies.
Ability to export projects to Excel for sharing with others we can't/don't want to bring on to Zoho projects
Zoho has been able to fit the needs of our Engineering organization. The employees and management that are using it have not found a 'catastrophic' reason to discontinue use. Although certain features and better support mechanisms would be much better, it has been able to keep with both basic needs and more advanced ones. A majority of the company has enjoyed the basic interface it offers, the apps it has for iPhone and Blackberry, the mobility of updating a project without needing to be connected to any type of server. There are still improvements that can be made in future releases but as the person who originally purchased the solution for our company, I have found it to be an excellently priced solution in the functionality it offers.
Zoho Projects is an easy project management tool to use. It provides all the functionality that we required for handling projects. We can easily create personal forms for projects and tasks, allowing us to add and report on our own desire. Apart from this we can create and edit documents in real time which saves our time. This allows us to share text docs, presentations, tables with the whole team and we can work on them together
Although it might lack intuitiveness, once you get a hang of how Zoho Projects works, you can do a LOT. The impact good project management has on profitability is huge, and it has helped not only improve communication and coordination when working on a project, but more importantly have adequate tracking of time, due dates and potential bottle necks
Oracle Aconex has numerous tracking capabilities, from the licensing, the insurance part, among the budgetary or costs. More so, Oracle Aconex has the offline access, a form of back up, to ensure that all operations are meet on time. The program increases or improves the skills and the knowledge base of the employees.
Zoho Projects provides a more limited set of functionality and customization options than other task/bug trackers on the market, but what it lacks in functionality it makes up for in ease of use. It probably has 80-90% of the features of its competitors but takes about a third of the time to get up and running and realizing value.
Unfortunately, prior to creating Project Task Templates we'd occasionally miss a step and something that was necessary would be overlooked.
The creation of the Project Templates was a team collaborative effort to make sure that everyone had some input as different people was integral to specific projects.
It took a little while to learn some of the more tricked out features like task dependency but even starting out with the most basic of features was very significant.