Optimizely Feature Experimentation

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Optimizely Feature Experimentation
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Optimizely Feature Experimentation unites feature flagging, A/B testing, and built-in collaboration—so marketers can release, experiment, and optimize with confidence in one platform.N/A
Pricing
Optimizely Feature Experimentation
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Optimizely Feature Experimentation
Free Trial
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Entry-level Setup FeeRequired
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Optimizely Feature Experimentation
Best Alternatives
Optimizely Feature Experimentation
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Optimizely Feature Experimentation
Likelihood to Recommend
8.9
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
4.5
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.3
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
5.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Optimizely Feature Experimentation
Likelihood to Recommend
Based on my experience with Optimizely Feature Experimentation, I can highlight several scenarios where it excels and a few where it may be less suitable. Well-suited scenarios: - Multi-Channel product launches - Complex A/B testing and feature flag management - Gradual rollout and risk mitigation Less suited scenarios: - Simple A/B tests (their Web Experimentation product is probably better for that) - Non-technical team usage -
Read full review
Pros
  • Splitting traffic between variants and enabling you to scale up or down the amount of traffic in each one
  • Giving a standardised report that you can share with a huge number of users
  • Showing a large variety of results/metrics you can then dive into
Read full review
Cons
  • Difficult integration if your data is not front end
  • Costly MAU model needs to be based on experiments not on site visits
  • It's not easy to understand how to build an Experiment
  • Onboarding team is more focused on punching through their slides and not focused on your needs or understanding.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Competitive landscape
Read full review
Usability
Easy to navigate the UI. Once you know how to use it, it is very easy to run experiments. And when the experiment is setup, the SDK code variables are generated and available for developers to use immediately so they can quickly build the experiment code
Read full review
Support Rating
Support was there but it was pretty slow at most times. Only after escalation was support really given to our teams
Read full review
Implementation Rating
It’s straightforward. Docs are well written and I believe there must be a support. But we haven’t used it
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
In previous companies I've used Monetate which is a similar A/B testing kind of feature experimentation engine that is very similar from my memory, but again, back to the point of these new features of the analytics engine and Opal, it kind of cuts it above Monetate from my experience. Obviously Monetate may have improved since when I lost use it, but from what I can see, yeah.
Read full review
Scalability
had troubles with performance for SSR and the React SDK
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • We have a huge, noteworthy ROI case study of how we did a SaaS onboarding revamp early this year. Our A/B test on a guided setup flow improved activation rates by 20 percent, which translated to over $1.2m in retained ARR.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Optimizely Feature Experimentation Screenshots

Screenshot of Feature Flag Setup. Here users can run flexible A/B and multi-armed bandit tests, as well as:

- Set up a single feature flag to test multiple variations and experiment types
- Enable targeted deliveries and rollouts for more precise experimentation
- Roll back changes quickly when needed to ensure experiment accuracy and reduce risks
- Increase testing flexibility with control over experiment types and delivery methodsScreenshot of Audience Setup. This is used to target specific user segments for personalized experiments, and:

- Create and customize audiences based on user attributes
- Refine audience segments to ensure the right users are included in tests
- Enhance experiment relevance by setting specific conditions for user groupsScreenshot of Experiment Results, supporting the analysis and optimization of experimentation outcomes. Viewers can also:

- examine detailed experiment results, including key metrics like conversion rates and statistical significance
- Compare variations side-by-side to identify winning treatments
- Use advanced filters to segment and drill down into specific audience or test dataScreenshot of a Program Overview. These offer insights into any experimentation program’s performance. It also offers:

- A comprehensive view of the entire experimentation program’s status and progress
- Monitoring for key performance metrics like test velocity, success rates, and overall impact
- Evaluation of the impact of experiments with easy-to-read visualizations and reporting tools
- Performance tracking of experiments over time to guide decision-making and optimize strategiesScreenshot of AI Variable Suggestions. These enhance experimentation with AI-driven insights, and can also help with:

- Generating multiple content variations with AI to speed up experiment design
- Improving test quality with content suggestions
- Increasing experimentation velocity and achieving better outcomes with AI-powered optimizationScreenshot of Schedule Changes, to streamline experimentation. Users can also:

- Set specific times to toggle flags or rules on/off, ensuring precise control
- Schedule traffic allocation percentages for smooth experiment rollouts
- Increase test velocity and confidence by automating progressive changes