Opinnate Network Security Policy Manager vs. Skybox Security

Generating audit reports were taking days just before using Opinnate NSPM, now it takes a few minutes.

For any customer that has a complex network environment spanning globally, skybox helps manage firewall policy compliance for many vendors quite easy. It has a variety of security and network vendors that it is compatible with in its database.

• Change tracking
• Configuration compliance
• Network map

Incentivized

• Revision Compare Results could be exported in pdf

• It doesn't support and integrate with Microsoft Azure
• The pricing is quite high compared to others
• There are a lot of bugs in the solution
• The implementation is not that easy and takes a long time, it needs to be more automated.

It is user friendly and quite easy to use. It centralizes all info in one portal and generates good reports to help you visualize and assess your change management decision

The support team needs to be improved especially in their response and awareness about recent bugs in their solution. For example, sometimes they are not aware about how to integrate specific vendors like Microsoft Azure and they still don't have answers to it until now.

Skybox performs better than Tufin and RedSeal and while AlgoSec performs as well, it requires far more manual configuration and customization than Skybox

Incentivized

• Reduces cost in terms of time and money to spend in remediation activity.
• Improve the network topology and then it's possibile to reduce cost of network/security appliances where they're not necessary.
• The cost of the solution is not trivial when the number of network appliances is big.

Incentivized