TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

OpenVPN Access Server vs. SoftEther VPN

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    OpenVPN Access Server

    Score7 out of 10
    N/AOpenVPN headquartered in Pleasanton allows users to create secure access to a private network in the cloud or on-premise with Access Server. Access Server is available to deploy directly on various cloud platforms like Amazon AWS, Google GCP, Microsoft Azure, DigitalOcean, and also available as ready-to-deploy virtual appliances for Microsoft HyperV and VMWare ESXi. Alternately, OpenVPN Access Server Virtual Appliance is a full-featured secure network tunneling VPN virtual appliance solution…

    $70

    per month 5 connections (minimum)

    SoftEther VPN

    Score10 out of 10
    N/AN/AN/A
    Pricing
    OpenVPN Access ServerSoftEther VPN
    Editions & Modules
    10 Connections
    $75.00
    per month
    25 Connections
    $150.00
    per month
    50 Connections
    $219.00
    per month
    100 Connections
    $300.00
    per month
    250 Connections
    $575.00
    per month
    500 Connections
    $1,095.00
    per month
    1,000 Connections
    $1,560.00
    per month
    2,000 Connections
    $3,100.00
    per month
    0-2 Connections
    Free
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    OpenVPN Access ServerSoftEther VPN
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsPrice decreases if paid yearly.—
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    OpenVPN Access ServerSoftEther VPN
    Virtual Private Network
    Comparison of Virtual Private Network features of OpenVPN Access Server and SoftEther VPN
    Feature
    OpenVPN Access Server
    -
    Ratings
    SoftEther VPN
    9.9
    1 Ratings
    9% above category average
    AES 256-bit Encryption00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Kill Switch00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Multi-Platform Support00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Split Tunneling00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    IP Address Masking00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    No-Logs Policy00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Multiple Server Locations00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Automatic Wi-Fi Protection00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Simultaneous Connections00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Customer Support Services00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    User Ratings
    OpenVPN Access ServerSoftEther VPN
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    OpenVPN Access ServerSoftEther VPN
    Likelihood to Recommend
    OpenVPN
    We used it to connect our two offices together. It aids in secure file transfer for remote users. Some of the 3rd party software is only allowed to run on specific IP addresses due to the license and this is a way that remote users can utilize that software without being on-site
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SoftEther Project
    SoftEther VPN works easily, and extremely well through Azure, client-to-server, and in Layer 3 bridge mode between offices but it is not so easy to use from mobile devices, although we have had success, albeit with difficulty in the configuration.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    OpenVPN
    • Secure
    • Easy setup
    • 2 free users
    • automatic updates
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SoftEther Project
    • It just works—I have never had a single call from a client or end-user complaining that their VPN wasn't working.
    • It can be configured to be super easy for end-users to use—Nearly transparent to them, in fact.
    • It is very lightweight on devices and works extremely fast. So fast, in fact, that about the only issue I ever have with SoftEther VPN are related to users sometimes forgetting they are working remotely.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    OpenVPN
    • some times error logs are not clear
    • Configuring 3rd party apps can sometimes be problematic
    • Limited functionality for iPhone users, but I believe that is due to an apple issue.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SoftEther Project
    • We have has some issues where their default port won't connect through an AT&T wireless AP, but creating an exception for it on the AP or changing the port always gets it working.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    OpenVPN
    We found OpenVPN to be more cost-effective vs Azure. In addition, it was easier to install, deploy, and manage
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SoftEther Project
    I had experienced several reliability issues soon after Pertino VPN-as-a-Service was acquired by Cradlepoint where the service would go down for a supposed update but would be down for long periods. And that was just one of several issues that caused me grief. I started looking around for a suitable replacement and came across SoftEther VPN, a project by the University of Tsukuba, Japan, quite by accident. I fell in love with its ease of implementation, low device cost, ease of Admin control, and ease of use for end-users, in addition to its near-zero downtime reliability, and the fact that I have total control over its operation and maintenance.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    OpenVPN
    • Only 2 free users, it would be nice if they would expand to 5.
    • Easy way to establish a VPN backbone between two locations
    • Great for work at home or BCP events.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SoftEther Project
    • I went from a Pertino/Cradlepoint VPN-as-a-Service requiring no hardware to a SoftEther VPN Client/Server configuration and that required the purchase of a tiny server to run SEVPN. It could have been a Linux box or Windows and I chose Windows, so there was a minimal cost for the Windows 10 device but it eliminated the monthly service cost and has historically been far more reliable.
    • We went from about $12/user/month on Cradlepoint perimeter81 to $0/user/month after about a $500 investment in hardware, so just one of my clients has been saving $300/month after the initial $500 for the "Server" device.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots