Voltage by OpenText vs. Proton Mail

Larger corporations that require identity-based encryption would benefit from the product. Smaller corporations that want a more feature-rich product with a better user experience would not benefit as much

Incentivized

Good if you like privacy and not having your data mined for advertizing and AI training.

• Encryption
• Format Preserving Encryption
• Scalable
• Simple licensing models

Incentivized

• Secure encrypted email hosting
• Connection with Outlook works well
• Works well on all platforms: web, Windows, MacOS, Android, iOS
• Low monthly cost for email plus all the associated apps

• Its web-portal is pretty bare bones, unlike some competitors that are more feature-rich
• Its documentation is also voluminous, making it hard to find something since it is spread across multiple manuals for particular features.
• It doesn't support IMAP connections, unlike some of its competitors.

Incentivized

• Exporting email (which I like to do for archiving) is awkward and slow.
• Proton Mail Bridge (which allows access from other email readers like Outlook) sometimes has synchronization issues. Lately these just resolve themselves.

Mostly intuitive and easy to use. A bit harder if you stick with two passwords (one for the account and one for the encryption).

FPE, which was one of the reasons for the technology and capability across large organisations made it a very easy decision. Reference customers throughout the world across FinTec's. The new cloud service models are really interesting. the amount of value in their R & D teams.

Incentivized

Proton had a wider offering of products like vpn and drive. I ended up paying for a yearly subscription, I liked it so much.

Incentivized

• Decided not to use the product after looking at competitors.

Incentivized

• Easy to link with my business domain and email.