OpenText Vertica vs. SAP Business Warehouse

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OpenText Vertica
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
The Vertica Analytics Platform supplies enterprise data warehouses with big data analytics capabilities and modernization. Vertica is owned and supported by OpenText.N/A
SAP BW
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
SAP Business Warehouse, or SAP BW (formerly SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse) is SAP's legacy data warehouse solution, now superseded by SAP BW/4HANA, and the SAP Data Warehouse Cloud which was launched in 2019. SAP BW versions up to 7.4 have reached end of maintenance. SAP BW 7.5 support is extended to align with SAP Business Suite with NetWeaver components. For existing customers maintenance is scheduled to continue through 2027, with extended support available through 2030.N/A
Pricing
OpenText VerticaSAP Business Warehouse
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OpenText VerticaSAP BW
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OpenText VerticaSAP Business Warehouse
Features
OpenText VerticaSAP Business Warehouse
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Vertica
-
Ratings
SAP Business Warehouse
8.5
Ratings
3% below category average
Multi-User Support (named login)00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Location-Based Data Governance00 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Data Modeling
Comparison of Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Vertica
-
Ratings
SAP Business Warehouse
8.7
Ratings
10% above category average
Data model creation00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Data Exploration
Comparison of Data Exploration features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Vertica
-
Ratings
SAP Business Warehouse
5.4
Ratings
2% above category average
Visualization00 Ratings5.40 Ratings
Data Warehouse
Comparison of Data Warehouse features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Vertica
-
Ratings
SAP Business Warehouse
7.5
Ratings
2% below category average
High-Volume Data Processing00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Data Warehouse Management00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Administrative Automation00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Self-Optimization00 Ratings5.60 Ratings
User Ratings
OpenText VerticaSAP Business Warehouse
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
OpenText VerticaSAP Business Warehouse
Likelihood to Recommend
As someone just starting out with data analytics and warehousing vertica is a great tool for a small scale business. It has amazing performance and can scale upto TBs of data. It works well for any organization which has about 100 - 500 DAUs of the system. The system doesn't require a lot of ops overhead. Scaling for PB data and 1000s of DAU is vertica's weak point. The system is just not designed for large scale usage and still has a long way to go to improve scalability. There are experiments to run Vertica query engine on top of HDFS which seem promising, however - if you have the the Hadoop ecosystem you are better off going the HDFS + Presto/Impala/SparkSQL route. But if you are in the Hadoop ecosystem, you probably are already investing a lot in ops.
Read full review
SAP BW is best for: 1. Large enterprises 2. Enterprises with 3+ legacy systems with entrenched users (politically difficult to merge) 3. Enterprises with employees who can understand both the technical capabilities of SAP BW and the needs of the business users - ability to speak both languages, otherwise the program could be unwieldy and potentially underutilized (it's not particularly inexpensive) SAP BW is less appropriate for: 1. Small enterprises 2. Enterprises who have well established, same location, CRM and UFS - the integration of data analysis will be easier and less expensive with other solutions 3. HANA
Read full review
Pros
  • Column-oriented storage organization, which increases performance of queries.
  • Compression, which reduces storage costs and I/O bandwidth. High compression is possible because columns of homogeneous datatypes are stored together and because updates to the main store are batched.
  • Shared nothing architecture, which reduces system contention for shared resources and allows gradual degradation of performance in the face of hardware failure.
  • Easy to use and maintain through automated data replication, server recovery, query optimization, and storage optimization.
  • Support for standard programming interfaces ODBC, JDBC, ADO.NET, and OLEDB.
  • Integration to Hadoop with the capability to perform analytics on ORC and Parquet files directly.
Read full review
  • ETL, great at taking data from OLTP source, flat file, etc... Easy drag and drop for transformations.
  • Great reporting possibilities, easy to connect with BO, BPC, etc...
  • Great Master Data Management (MDM )for BPC - helps us maintain master data for BPC.
Read full review
Cons
  • One time, one of the nodes wasn't coming up because of some ambiguity with the local data. Vertica wasn't able to fix it by itself and we were trying to remove the node out of the database and we couldn't do it. It would be great if that could be addressed. Luckily when we rebooted the whole server, some of the dead transaction got flushed because of which vertica was able to recover and the node came up.
Read full review
  • Age of software is showing as it struggles with very large data modules, which were not as prevalent in its early years
  • Querying performance at times can be very slow
  • Support and development for BEx has been discontinued or hard to find.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
It needs minimal trainings and can perform tasks of data management and reporting.
Read full review
Support Rating
HP/Micro Focus Vertica support is in par with other bigger vendors. In addition to this, there is enough best practices documentation available for some of the most common ways you will use Vertica that makes it easy to get Vertica up and running.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
MySQL and MS SQL Server are both fantastic RDBMS products. MS SQL Server goes a bit further since it has the builtin analytical functions. But it only scales so far. Once the data goes beyond capacity, getting results out just does not happen anymore. IBM Netezza and Teradata were both appliances that required different expertise than we had in house. Vertica was able to do the same, and in some cases better, on commodity hardware (frankly in our case old servers that were slated for recycling!) and at a small scale. In other words, Vertica we could grow slowly over time. Infobright is a great log processing database but for the functions we were looking to serve it just didn't have some of the features Vertica had that we felt were show stoppers.
Read full review
SAP Business Warehouse scores higher in data warehouse functionalities for integration to SAP ERP and other SAP solutions such as SAP CRM, SAP APO, and SAP SRM. Standard SAP data source extractors which are available in SAP ERP can be used immediately for full or delta replication into SAP Business Warehouse. System governance in SAP Business Warehouse is top-notch with change management support for migration between system landscape from the development system to production system.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Vertica increased our productivity in analyzing the data and validating simple proof of concepts with our data.
  • Results of analytical queries produced from Vertica are used by all departments as well as part of some of our products.
Read full review
  • It has helped cut down on parts shortages with the minimum stock flags.
  • People are able to track down parts easier because they can see where they were last used.
  • Our sales team has better visibility on lead times so they can accurately quote our customers.
Read full review
ScreenShots