OpenText MBPM vs. ServiceNow Now Platform

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OpenText MBPM
Score 7.2 out of 10
N/A
OpenText acquired BPM solution Metastorm in 2011, and has rebranded the product as OpenText MBPM. It is an alternative BPM solution to OpenText's primary BPM offering called OpenText Cordys Business Process Management.N/A
ServiceNow Now Platform
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
The ServiceNow Now Platform is a digital workflow building and extension tool for ServiceNow featuring a number of low-code / no code tools.N/A
Pricing
OpenText MBPMServiceNow Now Platform
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OpenText MBPMServiceNow Now Platform
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OpenText MBPMServiceNow Now Platform
Features
OpenText MBPMServiceNow Now Platform
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
OpenText MBPM
7.0
Ratings
16% below category average
ServiceNow Now Platform
-
Ratings
Dashboards7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports4.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
OpenText MBPM
7.3
Ratings
14% below category average
ServiceNow Now Platform
-
Ratings
Process designer8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Process simulation7.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Business rules engine9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
SOA support6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Process player7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for modeling languages8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Form builder6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Model execution6.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Collaboration
Comparison of Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
OpenText MBPM
7.6
Ratings
10% below category average
ServiceNow Now Platform
-
Ratings
Social collaboration tools7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Content Management Capabilties
Comparison of Content Management Capabilties features of Product A and Product B
OpenText MBPM
6.0
Ratings
31% below category average
ServiceNow Now Platform
-
Ratings
Content management6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
OpenText MBPMServiceNow Now Platform
Small Businesses
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.5 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.5 out of 10
CMW Platform
CMW Platform
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
CMW Platform
CMW Platform
Score 8.9 out of 10
CMW Platform
CMW Platform
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OpenText MBPMServiceNow Now Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
7.1
(0 ratings)
9.4
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.0
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.2
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
7.7
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
OpenText MBPMServiceNow Now Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
OpenText MBPM is well suited for rapid application development where process workflows are well designed in a detailed environment. A servicing organization could benefit from being able to manage and design complex case management processes and applications. It is not suited for the automotive industry where complex custom engineering processes exist within product engineering (vehicle) and manufacturing plants.
Read full review
Using it in the application support team is worth it as it is capable of carrying a lot of information. But using it for a Service Desk operation might not be of much use as it won't be used up to its full potential and will be costly as compared to other alternatives available in the market.
Read full review
Pros
  • Complex routing of tasks based on calculated criteria
  • Linking between tasks and accessing relevant information
  • Organising, scheduling and prioritising
  • Different views for different people
Read full review
  • It helps put manage the request really well. It is easier to create a request, track the request and manage the request. It doesn't get lost into a pile of requests.
  • We've already pre-setted some settings into our ServiceNow. So it automatically assigns the level of urgency and mentions on the ticke if its a high or low priority request.
  • I really like the ServiceNow dashboards. They ate setup in a really nice way. The dashboards show the real time data aswell as old data incase if we need to see if there is a pattetn in the request or to fix any recurring issue.
Read full review
Cons
  • The Metastorm process engine is based on an older version of .NET. Updating to a newer version would resolve several known issues with .NET email functionality.
  • Metastorm builds web pages at run time. While the UI presented to the end user is fine, the Document Object Model is convoluted and subject to change with new releases. Providing a more simplified DOM or at very least a custom function to replace document.getElementById() would make client-side scripting a much more powerful tool.
  • One function that I've seen Metastorm competitors do well, is email wizards. Having a WYSIWYG email editor would be really nice.
Read full review
  • Providing admins/devs with easier mechanisms for providing businss stakeholders with self-service admin capabilities across the platform
  • Tutorials on how to be the best at reporting in servicenow
  • Guided tour functionaltiy is a bit rigid and could use more workflow capabilities
  • Making it easier to push form variables to the user so there is more context when providing an approval. The out of box approval UI/form is terrible in my opinion.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
There are other products that seem to be a better fit for future initiatives.
Read full review
While we are very likely to renew, we are also assessing if we should renew all of what we currently subscribe to as we try to reduce costs. Some parts of the business feel there may be a better tool out there to fit their process requirements. We are currently working with them to identify what those requirements are to see if it makes sense while also pointing out a reduced cost of tooling is not always the best fit if we have an increased cost of customization and maintenance between tools.
Read full review
Usability
Although it is intuitive to use it does require training
Read full review
ServiceNow is a web platform that does not require any installation on a customer's computer. It is very easy to use and it is user-friendly. The customer started to open incidents very fast without investing time and money in training. Customer loves the dashboard at the startup where they can see all their open incidents or look at KB articles for any issue.
Read full review
Support Rating
Great customer service for an API support related query
Read full review
The platform is provided as a SaaS solution and support from the vendor has been good. There are regular software releases with bug fixes, new features and enhancements, and furthermore we are given the opportunity to fully test these before rolling these new releases out into the production environment to minimise the risk of business disruption
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
We went through a re-implementation last year with a partner and were very pleased with the outcome. We looked at several partners and chose one that was able to provide an entire scope and cost upfront of what would be required to complete our requirements. We worked very closely with the dedicated team assigned to our project throughout the process and they fully delivered on all of our requirements that we presented in the initial scope.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We found that OpenText MBPM held its own quite well against IBM BPM. We ended up choosing OpenText MBPM due to the analytics, complex routing, and the ease of SOA service integration. Furthermore, the ability to quickly develop simple User interfaces make this tool a daily component of our most-used toolbox components.
Read full review
ServiceNow was chosen as replacement for Microsoft Project , due to better licensing model, more flexible configuration of the project stages and components, better API with Azure DevOps. Also ServiceNow is best in the area of Incident and Service management systems and the proof of concept with Jira and incident.io were not successful and we kept relying on ServiceNow. ServiceNow is much more scalable than MS Project for constantly growing enterprise companies for both employee and external contractor type personas.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Easy and convenient access to client configuration information
  • It provides numerous built-in controls which are quite useful during rapid development cycles
  • It also provides a tremendously rich .NET framework which can be used to tweak the experience to the needs of each individual customer
Read full review
  • The biggest positive impact ServiceNow has made to our organization is reduced IT support cost. When we didn't use ServiceNow, we needed a bigger support team. Now we don't need as many support employees.
  • The other positive impact that I've noticed is faster solutions to any problems. ServiceNow makes very easy to resolve IT issues, in a efficient way. The tickets are organized in a way that the higher priority tickets get worked on quicker.
  • The dashboard has also made the job easy to find a recurring problem from its core and fixing it forever so that we don't repeatedly get the same issues again and again
Read full review
ScreenShots