OpenText MBPM vs. RPA Suite

RPA Suite

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
OpenText MBPM	Score 7.2 out of 10	N/A	OpenText acquired BPM solution Metastorm in 2011, and has rebranded the product as OpenText MBPM. It is an alternative BPM solution to OpenText's primary BPM offering called OpenText Cordys Business Process Management.	N/A
RPA Suite	Score 0.0 out of 10	Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)	Rigel Technologies headquartered in Madrid offers their RPA Suite, a customized RPA solution solution designed for enterprises to support interoperability and compatibility with existing corporate applications. It can be programmed in C #, Java, .Net, Visual Studio, Visual Basic, C ++, Delphi, is optionally cloud-hosted by the vendor, and it can be used to add to the existing capabilities of Visual Studio.	$0 2 bots, 90 days, 20 process hours/month

Pricing

OpenText MBPM

RPA Suite

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Free trial: $0
2 bots, 90 days, 20 process hours/month
Pay per use: $3,360
(yearly) 10 bots, 1 RPA Center seat, 280 process hours/month
Start Up: $3,500
(yearly) 2 bots, 1 RPA Center, unlimited process hours
SME: $6,500
(yearly) 5 bots, 1 RPA Center, unlimited process hours
Business: $15,500
(yearly) 10 bots, 2 RPA Center seats + 1 supervisor seat + 16 h support, 2 RPA Developer seats + 2 development bots, certification for 2 developers + 2 analysts, unlimited process hours

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
OpenText MBPM	RPA Suite
Free Trial
No	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No	Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Optional

Additional Details

—

All RPA-Suite licensing modes are floating. Only active robots consume licensing time, so idle robots do not count for timed options. A company may have more installed robots than those currently running a function.

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	OpenText MBPM	RPA Suite

Features

OpenText MBPM

RPA Suite

Reporting & Analytics

Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
	OpenText MBPM 7.0 Ratings 16% below category average	RPA Suite - Ratings
Dashboards	7.90 Ratings	00 Ratings
Standard reports	9.00 Ratings	00 Ratings
Custom reports	4.00 Ratings	00 Ratings

Process Engine

Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
	OpenText MBPM 7.3 Ratings 14% below category average	RPA Suite - Ratings
Process designer	8.10 Ratings	00 Ratings
Process simulation	7.10 Ratings	00 Ratings
Business rules engine	9.00 Ratings	00 Ratings
SOA support	6.00 Ratings	00 Ratings
Process player	7.00 Ratings	00 Ratings
Support for modeling languages	8.00 Ratings	00 Ratings
Form builder	6.90 Ratings	00 Ratings
Model execution	6.10 Ratings	00 Ratings

Collaboration

Comparison of Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
	OpenText MBPM 7.6 Ratings 10% below category average	RPA Suite - Ratings
Social collaboration tools	7.60 Ratings	00 Ratings

Content Management Capabilties

Comparison of Content Management Capabilties features of Product A and Product B
	OpenText MBPM 6.0 Ratings 31% below category average	RPA Suite - Ratings
Content management	6.00 Ratings	00 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	OpenText MBPM	RPA Suite
Small Businesses	Square 9 Softworks Score 9.5 out of 10	airSlate WorkFlow Score 7.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Square 9 Softworks Score 9.5 out of 10	airSlate SignNow Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises	CMW Platform Score 8.9 out of 10	SAP Build Score 8.4 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	OpenText MBPM	RPA Suite
Likelihood to Recommend	7.1 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	8.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Usability	9.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Support Rating	10.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Implementation Rating	10.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	OpenText MBPM	RPA Suite
Likelihood to Recommend	OpenText MBPM is well suited for rapid application development where process workflows are well designed in a detailed environment. A servicing organization could benefit from being able to manage and design complex case management processes and applications. It is not suited for the automotive industry where complex custom engineering processes exist within product engineering (vehicle) and manufacturing plants. Incentivized Harish Rajput Business Excellence Manager - Lean Projects & Process Methodologies Read full review	No answers on this topic
Pros	Complex routing of tasks based on calculated criteria Linking between tasks and accessing relevant information Organising, scheduling and prioritising Different views for different people Incentivized Peter Green Director of Technology Read full review	No answers on this topic
Cons	The Metastorm process engine is based on an older version of .NET. Updating to a newer version would resolve several known issues with .NET email functionality. Metastorm builds web pages at run time. While the UI presented to the end user is fine, the Document Object Model is convoluted and subject to change with new releases. Providing a more simplified DOM or at very least a custom function to replace document.getElementById() would make client-side scripting a much more powerful tool. One function that I've seen Metastorm competitors do well, is email wizards. Having a WYSIWYG email editor would be really nice. Eden Mack Senior BPM Developer Read full review	No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew	There are other products that seem to be a better fit for future initiatives. Incentivized Matt Temple Application Integration Analyst Read full review	No answers on this topic
Usability	Although it is intuitive to use it does require training Incentivized Harish Rajput Business Excellence Manager - Lean Projects & Process Methodologies Read full review	No answers on this topic
Support Rating	Great customer service for an API support related query Incentivized Harish Rajput Business Excellence Manager - Lean Projects & Process Methodologies Read full review	No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	We found that OpenText MBPM held its own quite well against IBM BPM. We ended up choosing OpenText MBPM due to the analytics, complex routing, and the ease of SOA service integration. Furthermore, the ability to quickly develop simple User interfaces make this tool a daily component of our most-used toolbox components. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Return on Investment	Easy and convenient access to client configuration information It provides numerous built-in controls which are quite useful during rapid development cycles It also provides a tremendously rich .NET framework which can be used to tweak the experience to the needs of each individual customer Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
ScreenShots		RPA Suite Screenshots