OpenText LoadRunner Professional vs. Testdriver

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
LoadRunner Professional
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
A solution simplifies performance load testing for colocated teams. With project-based capabilities, so teams can quickly identify abnormal application behavior.N/A
Testdriver
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
N/A
$1,495
per year
Pricing
OpenText LoadRunner ProfessionalTestdriver
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Basic
$1,495
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
LoadRunner ProfessionalTestdriver
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OpenText LoadRunner ProfessionalTestdriver
Features
OpenText LoadRunner ProfessionalTestdriver
Load Testing
Comparison of Load Testing features of Product A and Product B
OpenText LoadRunner Professional
8.4
Ratings
0% below category average
Testdriver
-
Ratings
End to end performance management9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrated performance data10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Deployment model flexibility9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Real time monitoring6.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated anomaly detection8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
OpenText LoadRunner ProfessionalTestdriver
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
JMeter
JMeter
Score 9.3 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
JMeter
JMeter
Score 9.3 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OpenText LoadRunner ProfessionalTestdriver
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
3.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
OpenText LoadRunner ProfessionalTestdriver
Likelihood to Recommend
Micro Focus LoadRunner is good for scripting and running a load test, but should be providing better customer service in case of user facing any issues.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • Support of multiple protocols like HTTP, RDP, Citrix, SAP, Oracle Database 12c, AJAX Tru Client, SOAP-based calls and others which is why it is used widely in our organization as we are using various applications in an industry for different usage.
  • Supporting the mobile agents which means it is not only used for web applications but also for mobile applications.
  • Latest version of HP LoadRunner makes the scripting easy by replacing dynamic changes in the script using correlation parameters. This means less coding and we can focus on major issues if needed.
  • Controller enhancements by specifying the cloud provider like Digital Ocean. We can provision our load generators with Amazon EC2, DigitalOcean and others.
  • Analysis provides a nice HTML report on the test executed with all the necessary metrics. We can simply put more analysis if needed and it will be automatically embedded in an HTML report.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • Monitoring tools like SiteScope, AppDynamics should be used apart from HP Performance Center. Would be great if the tool can give good monitoring on app and db servers.
  • As the load goes high, the cost increases. In the open source world, it's not a bad idea to consider the licensing cost.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Customer service is not that great. It's difficult to get hold of someone if an issue is supposed to be addressed on an urgent basis. No online chat service readily available.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Micro Focus LoadRunner fit well into our portfolio of tools with its long track record, ability to test near any application technology we adopt and allow for a single / cohesive toolset to drive our performance testing needs.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • It has a positive impact as we know how PE testing is (performance).
  • It helps with integrating data from various data streams and includes anomaly testing.
  • It does a good job with the accuracy of results. The results are very accurate.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots