OpenText Content Suite Platform vs. zeroheight

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OpenText Content Suite Platform
Score 7.1 out of 10
N/A
The OpenText Content Suite Platform oversees the lifecycle management of information across the enterprise from capture through archiving and disposition. With agile information governance to address the latest data governance and data privacy best practices, the vendor states their Content Suite reduces risk and empowers organizations to focus on using information to drive strategic growth and productivity.N/A
zeroheight
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
zeroheight helps teams create, manage and maintain their design systems. Using zeroheight, designers, engineers, and product teams can collaborate and build design systems that can be easily shared across teams.
$49
month
Pricing
OpenText Content Suite Platformzeroheight
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Starter
$49
month
Enterprise
Custom Pricing
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OpenText Content Suite Platformzeroheight
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OpenText Content Suite Platformzeroheight
Features
OpenText Content Suite Platformzeroheight
Enterprise Content Management
Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Content Suite Platform
7.6
Ratings
5% below category average
zeroheight
-
Ratings
Content capture & imaging9.30 Ratings00 Ratings
File sync, storage & archiving8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Document management9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Records management8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Content search & retrieval9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Enterprise content collaboration8.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Content publishing & creation4.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Security, risk management & information governance6.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract lifecycle management9.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated workflows7.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Artificial intelligence4.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile support4.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
OpenText Content Suite Platformzeroheight
Small Businesses
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.5 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.1 out of 10
MSB Docs
MSB Docs
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.1 out of 10
M‑Files
M‑Files
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OpenText Content Suite Platformzeroheight
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
OpenText Content Suite Platformzeroheight
Likelihood to Recommend
Your organisation has to support the type of document and records management needed for this to work. In an organisation that only needs to store documents and maybe share with many different parties, this might not be the best-suited software. In a large organisation with stringent document and records management policies, this suite is well suited. It makes management of documents across business units easy to manage and control.
Read full review
For creating and maintaining a component library, it is a fantastic tool that creates an interface between Developers, UX Engineers and Designers. It is easy to get both general information about a component, but also incredibly detailed information when looking at the component on a pixel-level, where information on paddings, margins, colors, fonts etc. can be easily accessed.
Read full review
Pros
  • ECM OpenText version is secure and easy to use
  • The different versions makes it easy to accomplish different tasks . We have more than three versions deployed in our company
  • The software is highly scalable
  • There are many customization options
  • The software is relatively affordable
Read full review
  • showcasing components and other topics
  • ease of seeing detailed information on components (colors, paddings, sizes etc.)
  • ease of finding information
  • possibility of going to previous versions of the design guideline
Read full review
Cons
  • The user interface and configurability of that interface lack a lot of flexibility and modern tools.
  • There needs to be stronger and more powerful integration to electronic forms and workflow capabilities which are core to modern ECM.
  • Management of audit and content history needs to be modernized and made more dynamic and sustainable.
Read full review
  • when opening a component image (which opens a new page where the detailed information like paddings and colors are shown), the zoom can only be done by buttons, I'd prefer to be able to use my mouse scroll and for vertical / horizontal scrolling to do ctrl+scroll or ctrl+shift+scroll or something like that
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
The staff is comfortable with it and I doubt they'd change at this point.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Strong for Core Content and Records Management
Effective for Non-Technical Users (with the right configuration)
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
I never had any issues with access internally or via VPN. But, the response via VPN, was a bit slow.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
  • I used OpenText nearly every day and I never had any performance issues that I can recall. That said, it's not terribly fast either.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
OpenText has an outstanding support and knowledge base. All problems which couldn't be solved by us (high complexity cases) were promptly resolved and the resolution also shared with us.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
No, it's pretty easy to implement and use.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
OpenText comes in different versions and you are able to choose depending on your departmental or organizational needs. In terms of functionality and capabilities, it was able to offer more value as it checked all the boxes in terms of long-time retentions, reporting capabilities, physical objects, and searches are great.
Read full review
I have used and still use Sketch and Zeplin too, but they serve other purposes for us. Sketch is used to design the components themselves and they are then exported to Zeroheight where they are showcased and enriched with textual information. Zeplin is used to design application pages, and again the components are exported to Zeplin from Sketch. But Zeroheight is mainly used for the development of the components themselves as well as a documentation for our design guideline in general. It is also used by us for design tokens and patterns, as well as other information on the design guideline, so if someone wants to understand the "why" of a design decision, the explanation can be usually found in Zeroheight too.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • With OpenText Content Suite, we save time thanks to its features such as imaging
  • Mobile support is amazing and this makes working anywhere easy
  • Since it is very secure, we do not have to worry about content
  • The collaboration features make it even better by improving the user experience.
Read full review
  • increased quality, as less misunderstandings or communication problems occur
  • increased speed of development, as it is a single source of truth for us. The developer can rely on the information in Zeroheight being correct so that he doesn't have to iterate his code again and again.
Read full review
ScreenShots