TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

IBM FileNet Content Manager vs. OpenText Content Suite Platform

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    IBM FileNet Content Manager

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AIBM FileNet Content Manager is a cloud-native content services solution to manage, share and collaborate on content to save employees’ time and improve customer experiences. This ECM solution includes functionality for document management, business process management, case management, content analytics, imaging, records management, and information governance. The IBM FileNet Content Manager content management solution provides the foundation for IBM Cloud Pak® for Business Automation. It uses AI…N/A

    OpenText Content Suite Platform

    Score7.1 out of 10
    N/AThe OpenText Content Suite Platform oversees the lifecycle management of information across the enterprise from capture through archiving and disposition. With agile information governance to address the latest data governance and data privacy best practices, the vendor states their Content Suite reduces risk and empowers organizations to focus on using information to drive strategic growth and productivity.N/A
    Pricing
    IBM FileNet Content ManagerOpenText Content Suite Platform
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    IBM FileNet Content ManagerOpenText Content Suite Platform
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    IBM FileNet Content ManagerOpenText Content Suite Platform
    Considered Both Products
    IBM
    Chose IBM FileNet Content Manager
    FileNet v ApplicationXtender
    FileNet - much more robust.
    ApplicationXtender - far more lightweight, easier to deploy and configure. Much more limited in scope.
    Incentivized
    OpenText
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    89%
    Would buy again
    17 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    5 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    95%
    Delivers good value for the price
    18 Answers
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    5 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    19 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    5 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    82%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    9 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    94%
    Implementation went as expected
    15 Answers
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    5 Answers
    Features
    IBM FileNet Content ManagerOpenText Content Suite Platform
    Enterprise Content Management
    Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of IBM FileNet Content Manager and OpenText Content Suite Platform
    Feature
    IBM FileNet Content Manager
    7.9
    23 Ratings
    1% below category average
    OpenText Content Suite Platform
    7.6
    6 Ratings
    5% below category average
    Content capture & imaging8.419 Ratings9.36 Ratings
    File sync, storage & archiving8.621 Ratings8.96 Ratings
    Document management8.423 Ratings9.06 Ratings
    Records management7.321 Ratings8.95 Ratings
    Content search & retrieval8.221 Ratings9.06 Ratings
    Enterprise content collaboration8.023 Ratings8.86 Ratings
    Content publishing & creation8.720 Ratings4.25 Ratings
    Security, risk management & information governance7.822 Ratings6.45 Ratings
    Contract lifecycle management7.918 Ratings9.76 Ratings
    Automated workflows6.619 Ratings7.15 Ratings
    Artificial intelligence8.116 Ratings4.24 Ratings
    Mobile support6.715 Ratings4.94 Ratings
    Integration8.421 Ratings9.05 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    IBM FileNet Content ManagerOpenText Content Suite Platform
    Small Businesses
    Dashpivot - By Sitemate
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Dashpivot - By Sitemate
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Epicor ECM
    Score5.6 out of 10
    Epicor ECM
    Score5.6 out of 10
    Enterprises
    OpenText Content Suite Platform
    Score7.1 out of 10
    Dashpivot - By Sitemate
    Score9.1 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    IBM FileNet Content ManagerOpenText Content Suite Platform
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.2
    (23 ratings)
    10.0
    (8 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    5.2
    (17 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    IBM FileNet Content ManagerOpenText Content Suite Platform
    Likelihood to Recommend
    IBM
    Well Suited Scenarios: Regulatory Compliance: IBM FileNet Content Manager is ideal for industries with strict regulatory requirements, such as healthcare and finance. It helps organizations securely manage and retain documents, ensuring compliance with data retention policies. Enterprise Document Management: Large organizations that deal with extensive document volumes benefit from FileNet's document capture, indexing, and search capabilities. It simplifies document management across departments. Less Appropriate Scenarios: Small Businesses: For small businesses with limited document management needs, FileNet may be overly complex and expensive. Simpler, more cost-effective solutions may be a better fit.Simple Document Storage: Organizations primarily seeking basic cloud-based document storage without extensive workflow automation or compliance requirements might find FileNet's capabilities excessive for their needs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    Great for content management and records even for organizations whose staff are not much experienced in the technical backgrounds as it's easy to use and no previous knowledge on HTML is required. It is great for storing invoices and payment proofs and for organizations dealing with global clients for general use documents.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    IBM
    • Detailed Audit trials for all document interactions.
    • As our organization grows, so does our data volume, IBM FileNet Content Manager seamlessly scales to accommodate this growth.
    • The search capabilities are powerful and we can quickly find information just by typing a name.
    • The version control feature ensures that every change, edit, or contribution is tracked and documented.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • Document Management is being done well since it allows you to put in a corporate folder structure that applies to the business unit you currently work in.
    • Records Management works well in this organisation as it allows you to classify the document according to the file plan, as well as manage it according to the retention schedule for tat file plan.
    • The ability to collaborate on files works really well. You can share with users within your group, as well as allow other users access to the files for either read access to read/write access.
    • Access control of the folder and even individual files allows you to ensure only necessary people can have the right type of access. This is especially welcome in the government environment where document management is of utmost importance.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    IBM
    • IBM FileNet Content Manager's interface is complex and difficult to navigate for some users. IBM should consider improving the user interface to make it more easier and intuitive.
    • IBM FileNet Content Manager may be difficult to integrate with other applications and systems. IBM should consider improving its integration capabilities to ease connectivity with other systems.
    • The wide range of customization make it challenging for users to configure the software to find find their specific needs. IBM should simplify the customization process to make it easier for users.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • The user interface and configurability of that interface lack a lot of flexibility and modern tools.
    • There needs to be stronger and more powerful integration to electronic forms and workflow capabilities which are core to modern ECM.
    • Management of audit and content history needs to be modernized and made more dynamic and sustainable.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    OpenText
    The staff is comfortable with it and I doubt they'd change at this point.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    OpenText
    Strong for Core Content and Records Management
    Effective for Non-Technical Users (with the right configuration)
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    OpenText
    I never had any issues with access internally or via VPN. But, the response via VPN, was a bit slow.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    OpenText
    • I used OpenText nearly every day and I never had any performance issues that I can recall. That said, it's not terribly fast either.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    IBM
    It's a great tool for our legacy system however the implementation, management time and lack of a niche provided by IBM makes it a difficult tool to recommend in a fast-paced market.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    OpenText has an outstanding support and knowledge base. All problems which couldn't be solved by us (high complexity cases) were promptly resolved and the resolution also shared with us.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    OpenText
    No, it's pretty easy to implement and use.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    IBM
    IBM FileNet Content Manager is a much superior product compared to anything in the market, IBM AI is really great and the ability to automate is really awesome. We also use other IBM products such as RPA and it integrates seamlessly. Compliance is really the USP of IBM FileNet Content Manager
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    Having used OpenText Content Suite for a long time, I can say it stands the competition. It offers many versions which is unlike many products in its category. Also, while it is not affordable, I believe the cost is justified considering what a business can achieve with this software.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    IBM
    • It really streamline the business processes and reduced the overall approval time across the department.
    • Search for Document is really accurate and easy to search the specific documents.
    • Manage the content is easy
    • Also allow to add non documents related objects
    • API,s are well structured and documented
    • Content Navigator is simple to use
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • With OpenText Content Suite, we can easily keep documents safe
    • Document collaboration is easy with OpenText
    • We can easily handle invoicing and automation thanks to features such as content capture and imaging.
    • With OpenText Content Suite, there is better file sync and archiving
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    IBM FileNet Content Manager Screenshots

    Screenshot of Editing in Microsoft Word - Collaboration in real time using Microsoft Office for the web.Screenshot of External file sharing - Securely share with external users.Screenshot of Annotation and redaction - Features an advanced viewer used to create annotations and apply redactions to content.