OpenText AccuRev vs. Plastic SCM

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OpenText AccuRev
Score 4.0 out of 10
N/A
AccuRev, a software configuration management offering, is now owned and supported by Micro Focus since the December 2013 acquisition, and now by OpenText.N/A
Plastic SCM
Score 8.2 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Plastic SCM is a full stack version control system that aims to make software configuration easy. It focuses on enabling dev teams get work done by facilitating branching, diffing and merging. The vendor says that for those purposes it provides cross-platform apps and GUIs with: Branch explorer Diffing and merging tools (both syntactic and semantic) On-premises and cloud repo management Code review mergebots (last mile…
$6.95
per user
Pricing
OpenText AccuRevPlastic SCM
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Cloud Edition
$6.95
per user
Team Edition (on prem)
$9.95
per user
Enterprise Edition
$23.25
per user
Enterprise Edition (perpetual)
$595.00
per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OpenText AccuRevPlastic SCM
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalOptional
Additional Details* Educational institutions receive a substantial discount on Plastic SCM licensing fees * Corporate/volume pricing is available * For more information, please contact sales at sales@codicesoftware.com
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OpenText AccuRevPlastic SCM
Best Alternatives
OpenText AccuRevPlastic SCM
Small Businesses
Salt
Salt
Score 6.2 out of 10
Salt
Salt
Score 6.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Salt
Salt
Score 6.2 out of 10
Salt
Salt
Score 6.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 7.6 out of 10
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 7.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OpenText AccuRevPlastic SCM
Likelihood to Recommend
1.0
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
6.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
OpenText AccuRevPlastic SCM
Likelihood to Recommend
This is one of the best version control tools I have used.
Read full review
Plastic SCM is well suited for the distributed development environment, where branching and merging can easily be handled. Its a good tool for version controlling, especially for a big team which is contributing to a big project simultaneously. Situation where Plastic SCM is not at all well suited are : If the project is smaller one and need to be handled by couple of people. So in that case setting up Plastic SCM and educating people to work on it is not at all efficient
Read full review
Pros
  • Creation of streams & workspaces are easy.
  • Easy integration with other bug tracking or tasking tools like JIRA.
  • File comparison and history is possible.
  • Project creation and setup is easy.
Read full review
  • Version Control
  • Organizing Workflow
  • Transparency
Read full review
Cons
  • The tool allows duplicate file name, if both are present in different directories. This creates confusion if multiple people are working on the same file. It should at least produce a warning.
Read full review
  • Interface
  • Documentation
  • Learning curve
  • Unity integration
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
I give it this rating because I found an alternate application that is much more cost effective and quicker
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
In my view, accurev ranks very low compared to other tools I have used. Microsoft TFS is the best in the industry as of today as it's a complete ALM solution. It does code version, bug tracking, user story documentation, and has easy integration with other external tools supporting many languages. So I would definitely recommend TFS to anyone.
Read full review
Plastic has best integration with unity - zero issues, native, straightforward. GitHub feels more stable but for smaller and or indie teams plastic s version control feels much more under control - you click, you feel safe. moreover, there is no need for extra tools such as gitkraken, gitlab, Sourcetree, fork, etc. it is really easy to develop games this way.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Quick merging.
  • Easy to roll back changes.
  • Good tree view.
Read full review
  • Easy to use
  • Cheap
  • Better than git for us
  • Artists love it
Read full review
ScreenShots

Plastic SCM Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of