OpenNMS Meridian vs. SolarWinds Hybrid Cloud Observability

Large network environments with few types of devices. The system is great but getting all of the MIBs loaded and to try and create unique rules /alarm type. Alarm correlation is doable but it takes too much manual work and XML configuration. I do enjoy the dashboard and surveillance categories.

Incentivized

For mid-market and larger, HCO provides a highly available single pane of glass. The user and group management provides a granular ability to deploy to the various areas of the support and engineering teams. Integration to ITSM platforms ensures that information from the platform flows in real time to the right people.

Incentivized

• When we used OpenNMS you could download the base package for free and configure it fairly easily for your own environment. You can't beat that kind of price break.
• OpenNMS had a very nice looking GUI that was easily navigated and fairly straightforward to understand and configure.
• There were a wide variety of add-ons available for download and implementation.

Incentivized

• unlimited APEs included
• all modules under one platform
• overall cost savings when compared to buying multiple APEs and modules, NetFlow NCM, Ipam, etc.

Incentivized

• It takes a fair amount of experimentation to fine tune information collection.
• Configuration can be quite cumbersome with a steep learning curve. It would be nice if more of this could be done via the web dashboard.
• The reliance on Java will put some users off. However, in fairness, it does mean it runs on a wide variety of hardware.

Incentivized

• Please fix the time zones issue. Events are in UTC, Charts in the user's Local Time, Alerts come in through with Main Server timestamp - it's all over the place & it's been like that for so long. We are a large corp, the teams span time zones and trying to work with teams across the globe is made so difficult by this.
• The inability to ingest the tags from AWS Cloud watch and the countless posts / feature requests on thwack complaining about this that just get ignored. It's such a basic feature of Cloud & I don't want to have to own a different product to use such an fundamental part of cloud.
• Maintenance Windows - why can we not set a reoccurring window from the web ui in 2022?
• SAM - Manage applications, why is there no search bar to filter through applications. When you scale out to enterprise size this is so annoying trying to guess which page to land on to find the application / device I'm looking for.
• http://hostname/Orion/APM/Admin/Applications/Default.aspx
• Half baked features being released - Log Analyzer shipped with no resources for the node details page. The Free version from 2016 had more available in it.

Incentivized

- decent ease of use - good training materials - good documentation - acceptable level of expected knowledge

Incentivized

Although Grafana is in no way an alternative to OpenNMS's full functionality, it can be integrated with other solutions (including OpenNMS itself) to offer the graphing and data visualisation aspects of OpenNMS. In this regard, Grafana is more flexible, and some would say prettier, than OpenNMS's graphing. For the best of both worlds, I'd recommend using them both!

Incentivized

Solarwinds has the best overlap of the two others I've mentioned - the other two tools (Datadog and Dynatrace) are great in their own way but Solarwinds is just good at everything; if I had to pick one tool of the above, it would be Solarwinds for the compatibility and ease of use, the other tools are more focused on being great at certain things while Solarwinds is the jack of all trades.

Incentivized

• We've been able to improve our customers' experience.
• Because we're able to respond to issues quicker, we're able to better meet our SLAs.
• We are able to see smaller problems and address them before they become big problems.

Incentivized

• Helps us maintain application availability
• Helps us shorten unplanned downtime
• Provides these benefits at a fair price

Incentivized