Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) vs. Snyk

MobSF is good for checking for vulnerabilities in your app. It will also give suggestions on how to address them. Another thing is can do is find code that may be incorrect. It is not, however, a substitute for a system that actually checks your code for proper use. It really is concentrated on security.

Incentivized

1) SAST Code Scan 2) Infra Code Scan 3) Docker Image Scan 4) SAS solution and provides good integration with various SCMS

Incentivized

• Scan for vulnerabilities
• Scan for bad coding
• Give suggestions on fixes for security issues

Incentivized

• Integration in CI/CD pipeline.
• Periodic reporting is also an option.
• Clear separation of issues/categories.
• Insightful reasoning for issue and suggested solutions.

• The UI is not that user friendly
• The documentation could be easier to understand
• An easier method of deploying MobSF would be appreciated

Incentivized

• Setting up is complex and when not do no properly provides too many false positives.
• We use another tool in parallel because it does not cover all of our languages especially for older code that is in mixed languages.
• Integrating it with bitbucket was not straight forward.

Incentivized

Developer-Centric Design - Snyk integrates directly into IDEs (like VS Code and IntelliJ), CI/CD pipelines, GitHub/GitLab, and container registries. Clear, Actionable Vulnerability report issues are categorized by severity.


Reports include fix recommendations, pull request suggestions, and links to remediation advice.

Incentivized

In my opinion, MobSF is not as comprehensive as SonarQube. Both, however, do a very good job in scanning your code for vulnerabilities. Both do roughly the same things. The reports of SonarQube are more detailed though. The advantage that MobSF has over SonarQube is the price. One is free while the other is a paid solution (with several tiers). However, we use them together to get a more comprehensive scan.

Incentivized

Developer-Centric Design


Snyk integrates seamlessly into the dev workflow (IDEs, Git, CI/CD).


Tools like Veracode/Fortify are security team-centric, with less developer engagement.


Unlike WhiteSource or Sonatype, Snyk has a faster learning curve and actionable fixes.

Incentivized

• It has allowed our apps to pass a security vetting requirement of a third party to deploy our app
• We can see where we can improve on the development of our app
• The deployment can take a while, especially with teams not familiar with the software

Incentivized

• The API is extensive enough for many integration options.
• API keys are rotated on a non-preferred time schedule. There's no way to configure this.
• We had a great experience with the support team and success managers while setting up the product and onboarding projects into the tool

Incentivized