OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance vs. Osano

OneTrust is well suited for mid-scale IT industries and mid-size infrastructure. OneTrust is excellent in Data privacy and Cookie compliance. And lLess appropriate for large-scale enterprise risk management. It is SSO and ADFS enabled. OneTrust is having great capabilities to integrate with other APIs and third-party security software.

Osano is great for a full suite of websites to manage. Agencies and companies with many websites to attend to are a good match for Osano's capabilities. Websites that run a lot of cookies and scripts (aka anything WordPress) are good candidates for this service. It is also useful for managing user data, although I do not leverage that feature in my own use.

Incentivized

• Module wise implementation.
• Very reasonable price structure.
• Easy and speedy to implement.
• Product roadmap.

• Improves the product regularly
• Easy to manage the cookies and scripts
• "Blocklist" feature is handy for spamy scripts still lurking on old sites.

Incentivized

• Documentation chasing for assessments is not as automated or hands-off as demos made it seem.
• Getting custom risk matrix set up required professional onboarding.
• Platform is less than intuitive.
• Pricing is module dependent and demos do not highlight which module is included in which workflow.

Incentivized

• Would appreciate greater styling control over certain ui elements than are currently provided
• As an agency having a plan / interface that would allow us to resell easier would be helpful

Incentivized

Missing some customization options.

Incentivized

OneTrust is more focused on providing an assessment platform than a vendor risk monitoring platform. This difference is why we chose OneTrust. For some, this will be a failure of the product. However, if you take the time to define risk for your organization based on the sensitivity of the data and the inherent risks of a vendor based on infrastructure you will create a unique and understandable metric for risk according to your organization. This adaptability is the strongest feature of OneTrust.

Incentivized

I prefer Osano over others for it's easy of configuration and flexibility to adjust language dynamical and legal requirements dynamically based on user device and/or location. Plus easily add team members to help manage the various parts of the software make this a one stop shop solution for our business.

Incentivized

• More uniform vendor assessments.
• Defensible numeric metrics reflecting risk.
• Centralized document repository for audit proofs.

Incentivized

• We were able to consolidate across the organization to a single solution reducing overhead.
• Legal compliance is more easily met without need to constantly review and adjust.
• Easy to manage interface has allowed team with less technical expertise to make simple changes when needed.

Incentivized