OneStream vs. Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
OneStream is an enterprise finance platform that unifies financial and operational data, embeds AI for better decisions and productivity, and can extend to meet the evolving needs of businesses without adding technical debt. Presented as an operating system for modern Finance, it unifies core financial functions and empowering the CFO to become a critical driver of business strategy, innovation, and growth. It is a cloud-based platform that modernizes the Office of the CFO. The…
$0
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Tagetik is a corporate performance management solution that unifies budgeting, financial planning, consolidation and management reporting. Tagetik is offered as SaaS, on a private cloud, or on-premise, and can migrate between deployments as needed.N/A
Pricing
OneStreamWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Editions & Modules
Free
$0
Basic
$12
per month billed annually
Basic
$15
per month
Standard
$32
per month billed annually
Professional
$39
per month billed annually
Standard
$39
per month
Professional
$49
per month
Enterprise
$83
per month billed annually
Enterprise
$99
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OneStreamWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeRequiredNo setup fee
Additional DetailsThe solution is only for Enterprises. Pricing for software is based on number of total users and one user gets all software functionality. Implementation would be based on what business problem or problems the solution will be used to solve, such as financial consolidation and reporting or planning or account reconciliations, etc.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OneStreamWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Features
OneStreamWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
OneStream
8.2
Ratings
7% above category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.1
Ratings
6% above category average
Pixel Perfect reports7.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Customizable dashboards8.70 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates8.90 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
OneStream
6.4
Ratings
24% below category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
6.8
Ratings
18% below category average
Drill-down analysis5.60 Ratings6.30 Ratings
Formatting capabilities6.60 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration7.00 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
OneStream
8.3
Ratings
1% above category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.3
Ratings
1% above category average
Publish to Web8.90 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Publish to PDF9.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Report Versioning7.70 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling7.70 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
OneStream
6.9
Ratings
10% below category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.5
Ratings
11% above category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)7.10 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization7.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Predictive Analytics6.70 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
OneStream
8.6
Ratings
1% below category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
9.1
Ratings
4% above category average
Multi-User Support (named login)9.20 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model9.00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)8.50 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control8.60 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)7.80 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
OneStream
6.1
Ratings
25% below category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
6.1
Ratings
25% below category average
Responsive Design for Web Access6.60 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile5.60 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
OneStream
7.7
Ratings
7% below category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.4
Ratings
2% above category average
Long-term financial planning7.70 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Financial budgeting7.50 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Forecasting7.50 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Scenario modeling6.90 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Management reporting9.00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
OneStream
8.4
Ratings
5% above category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.8
Ratings
10% above category average
Financial data consolidation9.20 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Journal entries and reports7.60 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Multi-currency management7.40 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations8.70 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Minority Ownership7.70 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting9.00 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails8.80 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
OneStream
8.2
Ratings
1% above category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.7
Ratings
7% above category average
Financial Statement Reporting9.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Management Reporting8.50 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting6.30 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting7.80 Ratings8.70 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing9.10 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
OneStream
8.2
Ratings
2% above category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.2
Ratings
2% above category average
Personalized dashboards9.00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards8.30 Ratings8.00 Ratings
KPIs8.40 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis8.30 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting8.10 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data7.30 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
OneStream
8.7
Ratings
4% above category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
9.4
Ratings
12% above category average
Flat file integration9.50 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Excel data integration8.70 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources7.80 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Best Alternatives
OneStreamWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
Prophix
Prophix
Score 8.3 out of 10
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OneStreamWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Likelihood to Recommend
9.2
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.3
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.5
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
Online Training
6.4
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
OneStreamWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Likelihood to Recommend
OneStream is best suited for medium to large companies that find themselves doing a wide variety of manual processes during their financial close cycle will get the most benefit. That does mean a lot of change so there has to be very intentional communication around change management in order to get the buy in that is necessary for success.
Read full review
Well suited for large multi-entity international, multi-currency, multi GAAP groups with excellent report writing features, customizations, and validation traps with minimal IT support. The ability to customize dimensions and dimension structures is a key strength. The intuitive user interface enables easy adoption by new users and training times are short. Upload features via embedded customisable ETL and standardised Excel templates are very efficient. Error checking is intuitive and helpful. Less appropriate for small single entity businesses.
Read full review
Pros
  • Consolidation engine is powerful, we have around 500 entities translating from multiple source currencies into a common currency at good speed.
  • We leverage the Flash and Quarterly forecast providing users with pre seeded data so they only need to make tweaks rather then filling in a lot of manual forms.
  • We use Transaction matching for processing a lot of intercompany matching invoices from the ERP systems which helps end users a lot. Data is fed in from source ERPS and TXM generates the auto matches based on criteria provided.
  • We have a custom Tax module which we use to pull in tax entries from the consolidation side and this gives the Tax teams starting position for their tax calculations and enables them to also do a quarterly forecast estimate.
  • OneStream has great dashboarding capabilities for a whole range of use cases from charts and graphs, to drill-back data to running even steps that users can execute without having access to the source code/rules in the background!
Read full review
  • Processes are clearly described in CCH Tagetik ; users can easily find where they are and which action they have to make
  • Interaction with Excel is really fluid ; the Excel add-in is easy to deploy and to updgrade, in the hand of users. It is reliable provided the internet connection is fast.
  • Managing hierachies is obvious in CCH Tagetik. Hierarchies are fundamental for a good reporting ; CCH Tagetik has obviously a deep experience of this feature.
  • SaaS : our experience with CCH Tagetik is of only 1 year, but it technically performs well, the system is reponsive, no shut-down, and updates (every quarter) do not disturb production.
  • AIH seems to be able to manage very large quantity of data, and to provide advanced analysis functionalities. We did not have time to explore them.
Read full review
Cons
  • Provide some more prebuilt dashboards that serve as reference examples for specific topics, to allow users to gain an idea of all that is possible
  • Provide some clear cut explanations to explain some of the standard concepts, to allow companies that start their implementation to gain a quick understanding of how things work
Read full review
  • The steps of setting up the loading of data is slightly painful.
  • The steps and error message while connecting the process workflow has to provide a hint on which area needed to be fixed (because it could be anywhere or anything).
  • The combination of 2 segments for the excel upload on what's needed to eliminate is yet to resolved. Which made the entire list very long.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Currently we are using OneStream with people 80 - 100 to load the PL, BS , Forecast budget and People Planning. OneStream give us more visibility on trend and way forward thinking. Thanks to OneStream for the tool which helps the business in growing way. Thinking of innovation OneStream is right path.
Read full review
Based on our business requirements, its current implementation and way of use (in terms of the efficiceny) it's more than certain that we will renew our contract with CCH Tagetik. CCH Tagetik increased our efficiency regarding reporting and provides more features which made it easier to take decisions. Besides of that, it provided he best solutions for reporting according to the Solvency II standards. Since this is still the case, it is also a reason to stay with CCH Tagetik.
Read full review
Usability
Overall usability as an end-user is very easy. There are more people in the system getting information now than the prior platform used. People are gathering their information quicker as well. From an administrator standpoint, there are fewer glitches and issues than the prior platform. This is very good.
Read full review
On a general level, it is a flexible, streamlined system, that can integrate operational data with accounting data for a better financial overview and budget planning. Reporting wise, the types and the amount of data analysis available or that can be created are close to endless. Having a quicker, more flexible way of analysing data certainly means better, faster reporting and better use of the data itself.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
CCH Tagetik has alwyas been there in case we need help. In almost 20 years of commercial relationship, I have no evidence of times in which they were not available to answer a question or to solve an issue linked to their products, timely and efficiently.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
As you can see, speed depends on the applications but also on the hardware that runs them. As far as CCH Tagetik improved, we saw the benefit of a cloud-based solution which could solve many speed performance issues.
Read full review
Support Rating
OneStream support is focused on the infrastructure. Which means mainly when there issues with accessing to the system, they will be able to help. When the question is to much leaning towards functional it really becomes billable. The other issue is that the response time is not optimal. There is a lot of pingpong of messages and the time between the message can sometimes be long. Sometimes this result into a simple ticket to be taking days before it is closed.
Read full review
I have had the pleasure of attending some courses at the dutch offices of CCH Tagetik. These were very educational with excellent trainers, a very enjoyable accomodation and they helped me a lot with regards to starting to use CCH Tagetik.
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
the training was not bad, but we got more training from working with the consultants. This because it is based on our system
Read full review
Online Training
onestream offers a range of training. I have attended a number of trainings. During the trainings a vast amount of information is discussed. The trainings also include exercises. The speed of the training is pretty high. When reviewing the training material afterwards, I found that the material is not complete as reference as it relies also very much on the verbal explanation and elaboration.
Read full review
Online training is the only form of training we could deploy during the pandemic. This service has been nonethless delivered with the same standards and the same results of the traditional training procedures.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
we did it in a coaching model. This allowed us to have 2 key advantages: we got to know the system very well and managed to save on the implementation cost. This worked well, was maybe a bit slower since we had to do this in our spare time. Nevertheless I strongly recommand
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
OneStream is much more robust, has functionality around creating financial statements in Common Currency which other systems we used could not handle. OneStream has a really good structure around it. We believe it's a much better fit for a Global company of our size. We're just scratching a surface of what the system capabilities are.
Read full review
Oracle Essbase is another EPM software that we used but compared to Tagetik, it's not user friendly and the creation of dimensions and describing rules are more technically difficult. Drill down and analysis are not as easy as double clicking on Cch tagetik for immediate information. But as I have not used this software much and tagetik more, this is all I can say
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
A good and performing scalability both on a geographical and a legal entity scale. The link with MS Office suite allows an easy deployment of the application, especially for contributors.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Customers have moved from multiple EPM systems as well as multiple EPM applications to OneStream.
  • Their ROI has been quite high as lesser admins are required, no need to move data back & forth, no need for an additional dashboarding / BI tool, once a user is on OneStream can leverage it for more than 50+ use cases at no additional license cost.
  • Automation, direct integration, scheduling, complex calculation capabilities, all help to further improve ROI and free up the time for the team to do value-adding tasks.
  • Last but not the least is the confidence on the numbers is much higher.
Read full review
  • It has definitely helped to standardize reporting across the company. Teams are able to pull the same reports and everything has the same feel to it.
  • Since there are so many standard reports that we are able to create, it makes the analysts jobs easier since they are not spending so much time re-creating reports.
  • With any system, there is going to be some admin work required. Creating new reports, accounts and entities does take time, but it is fairly simple and doesn't take a ton of time.
Read full review
ScreenShots

OneStream Screenshots

Screenshot of OneStream DashboardScreenshot of Profitability AnalysisScreenshot of Product and Customer ProfitabilityScreenshot of Account ReconciliationsScreenshot of Cash PlanningScreenshot of Financial Signaling

Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik Screenshots

Screenshot of Homepage