Okta Workflows vs. WorkOS

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Okta Workflows
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Azuqua was a tool that helped users integrate their SaaS applications and build custom automations. It was acquired by Okta in late 2019, and is now part of Okta Workflows. Okta Workflows leverages Azuqua’s workflow orchestration engine and application integrations to automate complex identity-centric processes such as user onboarding and offboarding. The product is available as part of the Okta Lifecycle Management…N/A
WorkOS
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
WorkOS, headquartered in San Francisco, provides APIs to make an app enterprise-ready, with pre-built features and integrations required by IT admins such as single sign-on (SSO), directory sync, and audit logs.
$49
per month per connection
Pricing
Okta WorkflowsWorkOS
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Single sing-on
$49
per month per connection
Directory Sync
$49
per month per connection
Custom Branding
$499
one-time fee Admin portal
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Okta WorkflowsWorkOS
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Okta WorkflowsWorkOS
Best Alternatives
Okta WorkflowsWorkOS
Small Businesses
CMW Platform
CMW Platform
Score 8.9 out of 10
Syncfusion® Essential Studio®
Syncfusion® Essential Studio®
Score 6.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.9 out of 10
React
React
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises
CMW Platform
CMW Platform
Score 8.9 out of 10
React
React
Score 9.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Okta WorkflowsWorkOS
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Okta WorkflowsWorkOS
Likelihood to Recommend
The integration I used Azuqua for was based on Salesforce, Wrike and Office 365. I found the integration of Salesforce reasonably straightforward, Wrike was limited in the "cards" capability but functional (there are bugs but there are also workarounds but they required assistance from the Azuqua support team) and Office 365 was quite immature (primarily around Excel bugs but also email was limited).
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • The best part about Azuqua is that you do not need to write code. You do however need to have an understanding of logic and how the software works. This happens to fit me perfectly as someone with basic programming experience.
  • Their Support is second to none. Not only are they extremely quick and responsive, but their answers are never canned responses and always provide valuable content.
  • They seem to take feedback seriously and will continue to evolve and make a better product.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • I think it requires an easy way to migrate flows created from one user to then move the ownership to another user. It happened to us that one of our engineers left the company and he had the Azuqua account and flows. It required quite some time, cases and telephone calls to do the migration to my account.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
The system is working as it should, keeping our programs safe from outside hackers. Helping us keep our passwords safe, convenient and already ready to get us logged into the program securely and quickly. Verification that only authorized users are able to access our company's programs. Okta Workflows (Azuqua) is a very good system that has helped our company greatly.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
I evaluated Zapier and Microsoft Flow before coming across Azuqua. Zapier was too simplistic and didn't allow for transfer of enough variables. The price point also didn't work for the value it could provide. Microsoft Flow couldn't make the connection with Smartsheet, and I was unable to get Microsoft support or Smartsheet support to assist me with the issue.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Increased time savings. We could not function as a matter of daily business if we did not have a tool to automate project folders (and complementary workflow management profiles) for the thousands of projects that flow through daily.
  • Opens up a greater understanding of all the silos and divisions within the company infrastructure and tests secure means to link those groups safely and share information.
  • Opens up the chance to communicate with other API information sources if our company is doing a partnership with another organization. Granted everything is square with IT security.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots

WorkOS Screenshots

Screenshot of WorkOS