NuLaw vs. PracticePanther

For a solo practice, this platform is great. It allows me to spend more time with my clients instead of handling administrative tasks. It is very easy to use and has low processing fees. I have used it for over a year and I am very happy with how this works for my solo practice.

Incentivized

• Workflows and task management.
• User interface and clarity of features.
• Customer service is expedient and helpful.

Incentivized

• It's difficult to sync with other applications like Gmail.
• Invoices can be a bit tricky.

Incentivized

Very easy to use and intuitive. This does not require complex data entry or toggling between multiple screens.

Incentivized

I love the Support team. Available through chat on any screen on your practice panther. They say they respond within 24 hours but it's usually at most 3 hours and they direct you a solution or that confirm no available solution. The team at PP is always helpful and know how to follow up with issues in a timely manner.

Incentivized

I used Clio and Clio Grow. What Practice Panther is missing is the side that Clio grows offers. A more robust way on the intake/marketing side. You can use mail chip with Practice Panther but that integration is limited. However, there is a much better software called Lawmatics that integrates directly with PracticePanther. For PracticePanther and Clio direct head to head, the workflows of task, billing and user interface have better ease of use. To do the same thing, PracticePanther requires fewer clicks to get it done. When you have to do the same tasks over and over, the less clicking the better.

Incentivized

• It has allowed me to keep up with my time and billing.
• It has allowed me to keep client information all in one place.
• It has allowed me to keep up with money that I am owed.

Incentivized