TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    NGINX

    Score9.2 out of 10
    Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
    NGINX, a business unit of F5 Networks, powers over 65% of the world's busiest websites and web applications. NGINX started out as an open source web server and reverse proxy, built to be faster and more efficient than Apache. Over the years, NGINX has built a suite of infrastructure software products o tackle some of the biggest challenges in managing high-transaction applications. NGINX offers a suite of products to form the core of what organizations need to create…N/A

    NGINX Ingress Controller

    Score7.9 out of 10
    N/ANGINX Ingress Controller is a traffic management solution for cloud‑native apps in Kubernetes and containerized environments.N/A
    Pricing
    NGINXNGINX Ingress Controller
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    NGINXNGINX Ingress Controller
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalOptional
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    NGINXNGINX Ingress Controller
    Considered Both Products
    F5
    No answer on this topic
    F5
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    30 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    26 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    30 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    90%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    18 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    96%
    Implementation went as expected
    26 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    NGINXNGINX Ingress Controller
    Application Servers
    Comparison of Application Servers features of NGINX and NGINX Ingress Controller
    Feature
    NGINX
    7.8
    21 Ratings
    2% below category average
    NGINX Ingress Controller
    -
    Ratings
    IDE support7.210 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security management8.018 Ratings00 Ratings
    Administration and management7.018 Ratings00 Ratings
    Application server performance8.018 Ratings00 Ratings
    Installation9.718 Ratings00 Ratings
    Open-source standards compliance7.016 Ratings00 Ratings
    Container Management
    Comparison of Container Management features of NGINX and NGINX Ingress Controller
    Feature
    NGINX
    -
    Ratings
    NGINX Ingress Controller
    7.8
    2 Ratings
    1% above category average
    Security and Isolation00 Ratings7.52 Ratings
    Resource Allocation and Optimization00 Ratings7.52 Ratings
    Discovery Tools00 Ratings8.21 Ratings
    Update Rollouts and Rollbacks00 Ratings7.52 Ratings
    Self-Healing and Recovery00 Ratings7.92 Ratings
    Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging00 Ratings7.92 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    NGINXNGINX Ingress Controller
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    Mirantis Kubernetes Engine
    Score9.4 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Oracle WebLogic Server
    Score7.5 out of 10
    Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Red Hat JBoss EAP
    Score7.3 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service
    Score7.4 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    NGINXNGINX Ingress Controller
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.8
    (48 ratings)
    7.9
    (2 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.1
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    NGINXNGINX Ingress Controller
    Likelihood to Recommend
    F5
    [NGINX] is very well suited for high performance. I have seen it used on servers with 1k current connections with no issues. Despite seeing it used in many environments I've never seen software developers use it over apache, express, IIS in local dev environments so it may be more difficult to setup. I've also seen it used to load balance again without issues.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    F5
    Best suited if we have to manage external traffic inside your Kubernetes cluster and want to use granular control to your applications.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    F5
    • Very low memory usage. Can handle many more connections than alternatives (like Apache HTTPD) due to low overhead. (event-based architecture).
    • Great at serving static content.
    • Scales very well. Easy to host multiple Nginx servers to promote high availability.
    • Open-Source (no cost)!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    F5
    • Provide access to containers
    • Manage traffic
    • Route traffic
    • Lightweight
    • Near to zero downtime
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    F5
    • Customer support can be strangely condescending, perhaps it's a language issue?
    • I find it a little weird how the release versions used for Nginx+ aren't the same as for open source version. It can be very confusing to determine the cross-compatibility of modules, etc., because of this.
    • It seems like some (most?) modules on their own site are ancient and no longer supported, so their documentation in this area needs work.
    • It's difficult to navigate between nginx.com commercial site and customer support. They need to be integrated together.
    • I'd love to see more work done on nginx+ monitoring without requiring logging every request. I understand that many statistics can only be derived from logs, but plenty should work without that. Logging is not an option in many environments.
    Read full review
    F5
    • Its not related to Ingress functionality but certificate management with cloud vendor would be a feature i would like to see.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    F5
    Great value for the product
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    F5
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    F5
    Front end proxy and reverse proxy of Nginx is always useful. I always prefer to Nginx in overall usability when you have application server and database or multiple application servers and single database i.e. clustered application. Nginx provides really good features and flexibility which helps the system administrator in case of troubleshooting and also from the administration perspective. Also, Nginx doesn't delay any request because of internal performance issues.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    F5
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    F5
    Community support is great, and they've also had a presence at conferences. Overall, there is no shortage of documentation and community support. We're currently using it to serve up some WordPress sites, and configuring NGINX for this purpose is well documented.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    F5
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    F5
    We have used Traffic, Apache, Google Cloud Load Balancing and other managed cloud-based load balancers. When it comes to scale and customization nothing beats Nginx. We selected Nginx over the others because
    • we have a large number of services and we can manage a single Nginx instance for all of them
    • we have high impact services and Nginx never breaks a sweat under load
    • individual services have special considerations and Nginx lets us configure each one uniquely
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    F5
    We are already using NGINX which is so reliable, it definitely lends weight to our decision to select NGINX Ingress Controller. Also, even though it is a little more complex to manage, NGINX Ingress Controller definitely have a richer feature set, better performance, caching, traffic management among other features which was why it was chosen.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    F5
    • Nginx has decreased the burden of web server administration and maintenance, and we are spending less time on server issues than when we were using Apache.
    • Nginx has allowed more people in our company to get involved with configuring things on the web server, so there's no longer a single point of failure ("the Apache guy").
    • Nginx has given us the ability to handle a larger number of requests without scaling up in hardware quite so quickly.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    F5
    • Security is one of the best objective which we achieve with NGINX Ingress
    • Cost optimization is one of the business objective
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    NGINX Screenshots

    Screenshot of Overview of the NGINX Application PlatformScreenshot of NGINX Controller - MonitoringScreenshot of NGINX Controller - Configuration