Imperva Application Firewall vs. NGINX Plus

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Imperva Application Firewall
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) stops attacks with near-zero false positives and a global SOC to ensure organizations are protected from the latest attacks minutes after they are discovered in the wild.N/A
NGINX Plus
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
NGINX Plus is presented as a cloud‑native, easy-to-use reverse proxy, load balancer, and API gateway, from F5.
$849
per month billed annually
Pricing
Imperva Application FirewallNGINX Plus
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Team
$849
per month billed annually
Advanced
$2,099
per month billed annually
Enterprise
Tiered Pricing
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Imperva Application FirewallNGINX Plus
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Features
Imperva Application FirewallNGINX Plus
Application Servers
Comparison of Application Servers features of Product A and Product B
Imperva Application Firewall
-
Ratings
NGINX Plus
7.1
Ratings
11% below category average
IDE support00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Security management00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Administration and management00 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Application server performance00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Installation00 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Open-source standards compliance00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
User Ratings
Imperva Application FirewallNGINX Plus
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Imperva Application FirewallNGINX Plus
Likelihood to Recommend
Incapsula as a Web Application Firewall is fantastic and very well priced compared to other products in the market. Load balancing supports management of multiple development and live environments, rewrite rules and behaviour rules to migrate traffic between sites and allow switching between different endpoints. The reporting features allow you too see the level of traffic instantly
Read full review
I think that NGINX Plus could be used in place of a hardware load balancer and it would be light weight and easier to configure than a hardware based load balancer but in terms of usability a GUI for said load balancer would definitely help in setting up
Read full review
Pros
  • Security
  • Reporting
  • Oversight
  • Redirections
  • Rules
Read full review
  • Load balancing
  • Caching
  • App security
  • Boost App performance
Read full review
Cons
  • The portal has recently been redesigned, finding previous sections will take time to familarise
Read full review
  • An AI bot would be cool to help build config files
  • More webinars for advanced NGINX Plus would be great
  • GUI tool... might already be one available
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
No reason not to renew it, we are happy with it.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
The UI is not there.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
We had an issue after upgrading from RHEL 7 to 8, and there were some issues that the security team imposed upon the platform with a scanning tool. We also had a VXLAN environment that was not properly sending a gratuitous arp to the network. NGINX support was instrumental to speedily resolving our issue.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
When going out to market we reviewed several products to compare. What we discovered was that Incapsula offered the best value and everything that we needed for a business of our size. We are able to "bolt on" bandwidth and functionality as the requirement grows, or scale down if no longer required.
Read full review
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • We are planning by using NGINX it can greatly reduce our OPEX by 50% "just our own running APIGW" the cascading effects in the long run will be much more.
Read full review
ScreenShots